The Critic's Resource on AntiEvolution
|Dossiers | Home | Incidents | Literature | Projects | Public BB | Topics|
|Donate | NCSE | PT | TD | TOA | Public BB Archive | PvM's Blog|
There are currently 0 users and 21 guests online.
As a rule, a scientific explanation should avoid several common fallacies. Evolution News & Views
Consider this analogy. Among scientific disciplines, none is more "successful" than engineering. Michael Egnor
Listen Now. On this episode of ID The Future, Casey Luskin discusses how the recent complete sequencing of the gorilla genome has challenged conventional thinking about human ancestry and explains what neo-Darwinists are doing to try to minimize the...
Listen Now On this episode of ID the Future, Dr. Stephen Meyer is a guest on the Hugh Hewitt show. Meyer and Hewitt discuss Meyer's recent New York Times Bestselling book Darwin's Doubt. Meyer walks listeners through the main...
Click here to listen. On this episode of ID the Future, Stephen Meyer and Michael Medved discuss materialism and how it effects our constitution. Not in the sense of buying more 'stuff' but instead the particular conception of human...
click here to listen. On this episode of ID the Future, Joshua Youngkin interviews Dr. Alastiar Noble, director of the Centre for Intelligent Design, about the debate over ID in the UK. The discussion hones in on Intelligent Design...
New Infographic "The Science of ID: Biochemistry" Beautifully Showcases ID's Use of Scientific Method
This infographic is a visual reworking of an excerpt from the Discovering Intelligent Design curriculum.... Robert Crowther http://www.discovery.org/p/215
If it weren't important, why would cells work so hard to translate it? Evolution News & Views
The articles are divided up into three sections: "Scientia" (asking questions like "can science can explain everything?"), "Fides" (asking whether faith is irrelevant in our modern scientific age), and "Scientia / Fides" (or "Sci/Fi" for short, asking whether science and faith can be reconciled). Casey Luskin http://www.discovery.org/p/188
Nationalized Science Education, Privately Funded and Formulated in Secret: "Next Generation Science Standards" Are Ripe for Criticism
According to the New York Times, the NGSS will "combat widespread scientific ignorance" because they "take a firm stand that children must learn about evolution." Casey Luskin http://www.discovery.org/p/188
Recently at ENV, Casey Luskin contributed a great (and disturbing) article about Ohio State evolutionary biologist Steve Rissing. Michael Egnor
Even the firmest bits of scientific knowledge are socially constructed, incomplete and revisable. Joshua Youngkin http://www.discovery.org/p/501
Darwinism is the biggest junk science incident in history, but who's quibbling? Michael Egnor
It's now evident that, their previous denials notwithstanding, Darwin defenders have been unnerved by Stephen Meyer's book. Casey Luskin http://www.discovery.org/p/188
When mainstream science journals corroborate claims we've made in support of the theory of intelligent design, we like to point it out. Evolution News & Views
Three geologists stand at the foot of Mt. Rushmore. Granville Sewell
Four Darwinian mathematicians and biologists from New York University (one from Puerto Rico) think that RNA molecules played games to invent life. Evolution News & Views
According to the National Center for Science Education, anyone with pro-life views may now be categorized and dismissed as being in denial of "science." Donald McLaughlin http://www.discovery.org/p/611
"Life Explains Life"? My Challenge to Dr. Novella on Evolution and the Second Law of Thermodynamics
Yale University School of Medicine neurologist Dr. Novella has replied to my earlier post. Michael Egnor
Among the scientific papers out there that try to refute Stephen Meyer without naming him, here's one that makes it all so simple. Evolution News & Views
Antievolutionists Say the Darndest Things
Antievolutionists often express outrage over alleged incivility from those who oppose their efforts to evade the establishment clause of the First Amendment. But they have no difficulty in dishing out the abuse themselves. Here is a sample from the Invidious Comparisons thread that documents egregious behavior on the part of the religious antievolution advocates.
Darwinian evolution with its blind watchmaker thesis makes me think of a great battleship on the ocean of reality. Its sides are heavily armored with philosophical barriers to criticism, and its decks are stacked with big rhetorical guns ready to intimidate any would-be attackers. In appearance, it is as impregnable as the Soviet Union seemed to be only a few years ago.