The Critic's Resource on AntiEvolution
|Dossiers | Home | Incidents | Literature | Projects | Public BB | Topics|
|Donate | NCSE | PT | TD | TOA | Public BB Archive | PvM's Blog|
There are currently 0 users and 6 guests online.
Casey Luskin talks about ID research at Biologic Institute, where scientists are testing the cooption model of the evolution of new proteins. Evolution News & Views
We affectionately call this the "Judge Jones Said It, I Believe It, That Settles It" approach to ID. Casey Luskin http://www.discovery.org/p/188
The pro-Darwin media love to print triumphalist articles, declaring on the thinnest of evidence that "creationists" are deathly scared of the latest science. Casey Luskin http://www.discovery.org/p/188
If I were Jindal and a reporter questioned me about my state's "anti-science" education policy, here's what I would say. David Klinghoffer http://www.discovery.org/p/209
Fossil extinction rates are smoothed over tens of millennia, whereas today's extinction rates are spiky. Rob Sheldon
It's worth noting how certain ideas tend to hang together. David Klinghoffer http://www.discovery.org/p/209
I believe that we are in the midst of a broad push, across different sectors of society, to make suicide more palatable and normalized. Wesley J. Smith http://www.nationalreview.com/human-exceptionalism
Following a moving target in near darkness: just one example of natural visual feats performed by the smallest animal brains. Evolution News & Views
Seeking to Vilify Doubters, New York Times Now Opts for "Denier" Over "Skeptic "
It is disturbing to see so highly regarded a newspaper embrace intimidation, calling it "accuracy." David Klinghoffer http://www.discovery.org/p/209
Unlike materialists, who MUST find a naturalistic explanation for everything in nature, intelligent design is without bias. Evolution News & Views
You may have noted that one of the sources of the claim is Paul Ehrlich. Wesley J. Smith http://www.nationalreview.com/human-exceptionalism
I am both pleased and disturbed by the Pope's encyclical. Michael Egnor
Listen Now. On this episode of ID the Future, Casey Luskin interviews Dr. Ann Gauger, co-author of Science & Human Origins and senior research scientist at the Biologic Institute. In recent years, human origins has become an especially hot...
Listen Now. On this episode of ID the Future, the CSC's Rob Crowther speaks with Casey Luskin, co-author of the new book Science & Human Origins. There are frequent and spurious claims made in the media that the genetic...
Click here to listen. On this episode of ID the Future, hear Casey Luskin's interview with Issues, Etc., in which he responds to false claims that intelligent design theory is based on religious belief. Casey discusses how many Darwin...
Click here to listen. On this episode of ID the Future, Casey Luskin addresses the question: Is intelligent design science? While the precise definition of "science" has long been debated, most would agree that there are certain qualities that...
Listen Now. On this episode of ID the Future, Andrew McDiarmid talks with biologist Ann Gauger about the ability of biology to continually surprise us--even when we think the science is settled. Dr. Gauger discusses some scientific "facts" that...
Listen Now. On this episode of ID the Future, Casey Luskin interviews Dr. Jonathan Wells about a recent article that claims that the human genome is full of useless, non-functional DNA. Dr. Wells explains the concept of "junk DNA,"...
Listen Now. On this episode of ID the Future, Casey Luskin interviews microbiologist and immunologist Donald Ewert about his previous work as associate editor for the journal Development and Comparitive Immunology, where he realized that the papers published were...
Listen Now. On this episode of ID the Future Dr. David Snoke continues his conversation with Casey Luskin on his recent paper on systems biology and how it relates to intelligent design. Snoke discusses the assumptions made by systems...
Antievolutionists Say the Darndest Things
Antievolutionists often express outrage over alleged incivility from those who oppose their efforts to evade the establishment clause of the First Amendment. But they have no difficulty in dishing out the abuse themselves. Here is a sample from the Invidious Comparisons thread that documents egregious behavior on the part of the religious antievolution advocates.
IDC advocate Jonathan Wells:
These critics include embryologists, paleontologists, biochemists, molecular biologists, medical doctors, philosophers, and even lawyers. Unfortunately, the North American science-and-religion establishment has largely turned a deaf ear to these critics, preferring instead to abandon classical theology and embrace metaphysical materialism and moral relativism. But I see the situation as analogous to the last years of Soviet communism. A small, powerful elite controls all the official information outlets while the evidence against the official position swells quietly, like a wave building offshore. Someday soon, to the surprise of many people in academia and the media, the wave will break. I predict that the Darwinist establishment will come apart at the seams, just as the Soviet Empire did in 1990.Link