The Critic's Resource on AntiEvolution
|Dossiers | Home | Incidents | Literature | Projects | Public BB | Topics|
|Donate | NCSE | PT | TD | TOA | Public BB Archive | PvM's Blog|
There are currently 0 users and 2 guests online.
ENV asked the Evolutionary Informatics Lab to respond to a critique of the work of William Dembski by geneticist Joe Felsenstein at the University of Washington. Winston Ewert
Have evolutionists in the Netherlands succeeded in explaining parts of a cilium using only natural selection? Evolution News & Views
Click here to listen. On this episode of ID the Future, David Klinghoffer gives advice on how to have constructive conversations with those who are unfriendly towards intelligent design theory....
Click here to listen. On this episode of ID the Future, Anika Smith interviews CSC Senior Fellow Jay Richards about when it's wise to doubt a "scientific consensus." With growing skepticism on issues where the public is told that...
Click here to listen. On this episode of ID The Future, we return to the topic of the anti-science label and how opponents of intelligent design try to stifle the debate by using this unscientific term. Tune in to...
If he doesn't know what he's talking about on those subjects that I know well, why should I trust him on topics that I don't know so well? Jonathan M. http://www.intelligentdesign.org
Friday in Seattle, Plantinga Will Speak on "Why Science Needs Religion: Science's Untold Conflict with Atheism"
Christianity Today has called Alvin Plantinga "arguably the greatest philosopher of the last century." Evolution News & Views
Why is a life-permitting universe "specified" but the birth of A.C. Grayling not so? Jonathan M. http://www.intelligentdesign.org
It looks like a random rockpile at the bottom of a lake, but archaeologists detect intelligent origin. Evolution News & Views
It's cute until you realize you paid for it. David Klinghoffer http://www.discovery.org/p/209
We now live in a "post-Darwinian" world, where evolutionary biologists scramble to propose new materialistic evolutionary models to replace the modern synthesis. Casey Luskin http://www.discovery.org/p/188
"Synthetic biology" is defined as applying engineering principles to biological parts. Evolution News & Views
The two-day event featured notable speakers including John Lennox, Stephen Meyer, Douglas Axe, Paul Nelson, Vern Poythress, John West, Megan Best and Scott Oliphint. Jonathan M. http://www.intelligentdesign.org
Imagine that Darwin had fallen overboard and there was no Origin of Species or anything else from his pen. Michael Flannery http://www.discovery.org/p/471
If something works, and if the research has no need of unguided processes to explain it, then yes: it's de facto intelligent-design research. Evolution News & Views
Non-scientists everywhere learned a valuable lesson about asking questions in public: don't do it. Joshua Youngkin http://www.discovery.org/p/501
And what do you know, in a nice coincidence, Dr. Plantinga will be speaking in Seattle next week. Evolution News & Views
Several years ago, PZ Myers inaugurated what he called "Paul Nelson Day" (April 7), his annual lampooning of me for my failure to articulate the concept of "ontogenetic depth." Paul Nelson http://www.discovery.org/p/45
Click here to listen. On this episode of ID The Future, Casey Luskin discusses a paper by Northern Arizona University philosopher Peter Kosso that challenges the typical definition of theory used by the Darwin lobby. When attacking opponents, Darwin...
If sociology is destiny, that's welcome news for Darwin skeptics. David Klinghoffer http://www.discovery.org/p/209
Antievolutionists Say the Darndest Things
Antievolutionists often express outrage over alleged incivility from those who oppose their efforts to evade the establishment clause of the First Amendment. But they have no difficulty in dishing out the abuse themselves. Here is a sample from the Invidious Comparisons thread that documents egregious behavior on the part of the religious antievolution advocates.
Darwinian evolution with its blind watchmaker thesis makes me think of a great battleship on the ocean of reality. Its sides are heavily armored with philosophical barriers to criticism, and its decks are stacked with big rhetorical guns ready to intimidate any would-be attackers. In appearance, it is as impregnable as the Soviet Union seemed to be only a few years ago.