The Critic's Resource on AntiEvolution
|Dossiers | Home | Incidents | Literature | Projects | Public BB | Topics|
|Donate | NCSE | PT | TD | TOA | Public BB Archive | PvM's Blog|
There are currently 0 users and 15 guests online.
From the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, with my commentary. Michael Egnor
It's surely not a coincidence that this season in science-journal publishing we've seen a variety of attempts to solve the enigma that Stephen Meyer describes in his new book, Darwin's Doubt. Evolution News & Views
Click here to listen. On this episode of ID the Future, Casey Luskin discusses recent incidents that reveal a disturbing trend: Darwin activists are using a "heckler's veto" to intimidate academic institutions into shutting down scientific inquiry over life's...
Click here to listen. On this episode of ID the Future, Casey Luskin shows how the human fossil record contradicts the expectations of neo-Darwinian evolution. Luskin takes a close look at the technical literature surrounding human origins and explains...
Click here to listen. On this episode of ID the Future, Michael Medved, DI Senior Fellow Wesley J. Smith, and CSC Associate Director John West examine the question: Are humans unique, or are we, as many argue, just another...
An otherwise scientifically sound paper might not be cited for reasons that are political, not scientific. In the intelligent-design movement, we've seen this many times. Casey Luskin http://www.discovery.org/p/188
As a journalist who has covered the intelligent design controversy for 12 years, I ended up asking a question repeatedly: What exactly has materialism done for science? Denyse O'Leary
In 2011, Dr. Alvin Plantinga, the foremost living Christian philosopher, released his book Where the Conflict Really Lies. Donald McLaughlin http://www.discovery.org/p/611
Jerry is so blinkered by his materialist metaphysics that he can't admit the obvious. Michael Egnor
After decades of cultural blunders, atheists are increasingly aware of the need to improve public relations. Casey Luskin http://www.discovery.org/p/188
According to Charles Marshall, I argue "that paleontologists are unable to explain the Cambrian explosion, thus opening the door to the possibility of a designer's intervention." Stephen C. Meyer http://www.signatureinthecell.com
Scientism will die a natural death, as any complex organism without a brain inevitably does. Michael Egnor
This just in from ASBMB Today, the official magazine of the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. Michael Behe
It would be hard to think of an American journalist who writes as capably as Booker does about the failures of Darwinism's beguiling fable. David Klinghoffer http://www.discovery.org/p/209
Ah yes, this was a fun one. David Klinghoffer http://www.discovery.org/p/209
Feel pity for letters editor Paul Thornton. He says he will not print letters that are skeptical of the human role in climate change. Bruce Chapman http://www.discovery.org/p/7
More often than not, it's been a safe bet to begin with the assumption: "If it works, it's not happening by accident." Evolution News & Views
Today on the Medved Show's Science & Culture Update, Stephen Meyer and Christopher Booker Will Talk About Science and "Anti-Science"
Climate change and Darwinian evolution seem, at first glance, to have little in common. Evolution News & Views
In Current Biology, the phrase about its being a "highly evolved mechanism" is used as a Darwinian substitute for "well designed system." Evolution News & Views
Antievolutionists Say the Darndest Things
Antievolutionists often express outrage over alleged incivility from those who oppose their efforts to evade the establishment clause of the First Amendment. But they have no difficulty in dishing out the abuse themselves. Here is a sample from the Invidious Comparisons thread that documents egregious behavior on the part of the religious antievolution advocates.
IDC advocate Phillip E. Johnson:
Gould’s uncomfortable situation reminds me of the self-created predicament of Mikhail Gorbachev in the last years of the Soviet Empire. Gorbachev recognized that something had gone wrong with the Communist system, but thought that the system itself could be preserved if it was reformed. His democratic friends warned him that the Marxist fundamentalists would inevitably turn against him, but he was unwilling to endanger his position in the ruling elite by following his own logic to its necessary conclusion. Gould, like Gorbachev, deserves immense credit for bringing glasnost to a closed society of dogmatists. And, like Gorbachev, he lives on as a sad reminder of what happens to those who lack the nerve to make a clean break with a dying theory.Link