The Critic's Resource on AntiEvolution
|Dossiers | Home | Incidents | Literature | Projects | Public BB | Topics|
|Donate | NCSE | PT | TD | TOA | Public BB Archive | PvM's Blog|
There are currently 0 users and 3 guests online.
It is sloppy to use dubious metaphors to describe brains or people. It is egregious to actually believe those metaphors. Michael Egnor
The Evolution Revolution: Physicist Lee Spetner Shows Why Convergence Challenges Neo-Darwinian Evolution
A new book provides some wonderful arguments that challenge common descent and neo-Darwinian explanations of evolution. Casey Luskin http://www.discovery.org/p/188
Science should turn its attention to where the mysteries are, hoping for understanding. ID promotes that spirit. Evolution News & Views
I cannot think of any major person affiliated with the ID movement who has opposed teaching evolution as a scientific theory. Casey Luskin http://www.discovery.org/p/188
Far from encouraging skepticism, the mention of "science" can call forth a perilous gullibility. David Klinghoffer http://www.discovery.org/p/209
I'm a fan of much of McGrath's writings, but when it comes to ID, there are problems. Casey Luskin http://www.discovery.org/p/188
In the end, as at the beginning, there is information. David Klinghoffer http://www.discovery.org/p/209
Dr. Tour of Rice University, regarded as one of America's fifty top scientists, is quoted about his innocent-sounding discussions with fellow scientists. Bruce Chapman http://www.discovery.org/p/7
You want a scholar-athlete? We've got one right here. David Klinghoffer http://www.discovery.org/p/209
Who says humans aren't exceptional? Scientists have renamed the current era "Anthropocene." Wesley J. Smith http://www.nationalreview.com/human-exceptionalism
The reproductive process of these organisms is very strange. Casey Luskin http://www.discovery.org/p/188
This is pretty stereotype-shattering. David Klinghoffer http://www.discovery.org/p/209
Count on the New York Times to publish anti-human exceptionalism pieces in its opinion section or magazine at least twice a month. Wesley J. Smith http://www.nationalreview.com/human-exceptionalism
What if the answers to some scientific questions were correct but defined as outside the bounds of science? Denyse O'Leary
Observation: many flowering plants are polyploid. Illogical conclusion: polyploidy is a creative force in evolution. Evolution News & Views
Scientists and engineers are in an international race to copy nature's designs, and Darwinians want to cash in. Evolution News & Views
Nature Admits Scientists Suppress Criticisms of Neo-Darwinism to Avoid Lending Support to Intelligent Design
If you think that ID isn't making an impact on evolutionary science, think again. Casey Luskin http://www.discovery.org/p/188
You can watch some pretty amazing things emerge in nature by a combination of law and chance. A snowflake, for example. Evolution News & Views
A very thoughtful guy, too, as you can confirm by listening to Casey Luskin's interview with him. David Klinghoffer http://www.discovery.org/p/209
Listen Now. On this episode of ID the Future, Casey Luskin interviews Dr. Ann Gauger, co-author of Science & Human Origins and senior research scientist at the Biologic Institute. In recent years, human origins has become an especially hot...
Antievolutionists Say the Darndest Things
Antievolutionists often express outrage over alleged incivility from those who oppose their efforts to evade the establishment clause of the First Amendment. But they have no difficulty in dishing out the abuse themselves. Here is a sample from the Invidious Comparisons thread that documents egregious behavior on the part of the religious antievolution advocates.
IDC advocate Mark Hartwig:
The intimidation tactics, however, signal something important about Darwinists. That "something" was explained in an insightful little piece by one A.J. Obrdlik. Published in 1942, it was a study of "gallows humor" in Czechoslovakia during the Nazi occupation. In that article, Obrdlik made a very keen observation:
Gallows humor is a reliable index of the morale of the oppressed whereas the reaction to it on the part of the oppressors tells a long story about the actual strength of the dictators: If they can afford to ignore it, they are strong; if they react wildly with anger, striking their victims with severe reprisals and punishment, they are not sure of themselves, no matter how much they display their might on the surface.
With the growing success of the Wedge, I'm sure we're going to see a lot more of this stuff. But Darwinist tactics will become a lot less intimidating as people realize that they signify not strength but panic.Link