Your IP address is 18.104.22.168
View Author detected.
view author posts with search matches:
Retrieve source record and display it.
q: SELECT AUTHOR, MEMBER_NAME, IP_ADDR, POST_DATE, TOPIC_ID, t1.FORUM_ID, POST, POST_ID, FORUM_VIEW_THREADS from ib_forum_posts AS t1 LEFT JOIN (ib_member_profiles AS t2, ib_forum_info AS t3) ON (t1.forum_id = t3.forum_id AND t1.author = t2.member_id) WHERE MEMBER_NAME like 'moioci%' and forum_view_threads LIKE '*' ORDER BY POST_DATE ASC
DB_result: Resource id #4
|Date: 2005/03/28 21:38:53, Link|
the link to the email in your PT post doesn't work. I'm sure it's good for some chuckles...
|Date: 2005/04/04 15:15:54, Link|
|I'm not aware of any tenet of ID that says there can only be ONE designer, although that seems to be the presumption. Thus if several or a million designers were operating throughout history, radically different designs would be possible or even likely. Therefore the absence of common design in no way disproves ID. The presence of features usually accepted as supporting common descent is pretty weak evidence FOR ID. And, as noted, absence of common design doesn't count against ID, unless you argue there can only be one designer, and that comes perilously close to giving the Designer a name...|
|Date: 2005/04/14 01:04:33, Link|
In his latest newsletter, Scott Adams of Dilbert fame gets into the ID debate in a typically offbeat way:
Look under "Strange Thought of the Day"; I don't want to spoil it, but I will say he starts from these premises:
# DNA has a lot of "junk" parts that don't seem to have any function.
# A lot of people think evolution is obviously "designed" by someone.
|Date: 2009/05/23 21:37:50, Link|
Freudian slip, no doubt.