I then thought, "wow even Behe's buddies mock him!"
Yeah I know the Brites is supposed to be funny and all, but this is funny for all the wrong reasons. Galapagos Finch is f**king retarded.
form_srcid: hooligans
form_cmd: view_author
Your IP address is 38.107.191.95
View Author detected.
view author posts:
Retrieve source record and display it.
form_author:
form_srcid: hooligans
q: SELECT AUTHOR, MEMBER_NAME, IP_ADDR, POST_DATE, TOPIC_ID, t1.FORUM_ID, POST, POST_ID, FORUM_VIEW_THREADS from ib_forum_posts AS t1 LEFT JOIN (ib_member_profiles AS t2, ib_forum_info AS t3) ON (t1.forum_id = t3.forum_id AND t1.author = t2.member_id) WHERE MEMBER_NAME like 'hooligans%' and forum_view_threads LIKE '*' ORDER BY POST_DATE ASC
DB_err:
DB_result: Resource id #4
| Date: 2007/01/26 17:06:27, Link 168.99.75.193 |
| Author: hooligans |
| As a longtime troll here and at the PandasThumb, I simply had to register and share in the communal guffaw of Mr. Hunter's argument. This chap has actually used, as his evidence, a picture from a coloring book designed for adolescents!!!! Holy crap!!! I finally get why the word TARD is used so often here. :O |
| Date: 2007/01/26 17:39:37, Link 168.99.75.193 |
| Author: hooligans |
|
At UD they are continuing to rail on how these expensive journals should be freely availible to all taxpayers . . . hmmm . . . . so this means because some of my tax dollars help fund our local libraries I am entitled to my own copy of every book in it!!!! [I]The Conspiracy Revealed Shocking report by undercover DI operatives captures library staffers at universities all over America hiding freely availible science journals. [I] Using secret cameras, a team of undercover, specially trained operatives, infiltrated the Portland State University Branford P. Millar Library. There the schocking truth was revealed . . . An evil Darwinian conspiracy is afoot. Hidden away behind a secret locked door, is an entirely self-contained library wherein stacks of scientific journals are freely avaible to those who have access to the secret password. Here our tax dollars go. Here we fund thier evil conspiracy, while being depreived of equal access. This travesty of justice shall not stand. |
| Date: 2007/02/14 14:31:04, Link 168.99.75.193 |
| Author: hooligans |
|
Holy mackeral! If you look down the recent posts over at UD you begin to see the sketch of what Intelligent Design has to offer our society: 1) Civilization Calls: Nutty neocon rantings compiled in one thread with a bit of bigotry to boot! 2) Global Warming: It’s just a conspiracy!!!!!! Haven’t you read Michael Crichton!!!! It’s all a lie and he’s an authority, just look at the research he did! 3) Two Mass Murders on Darwin Day: Basically Darwin and Evolution are evil and cause people to kill each other. These murders are proof. 4) Judge Jones Farts A Lot: This means his ruling was wrong. 5) Young Earth Creationist Gets PhD: ID has nothing to do with religion. 6) DCA Rocks: This proves that Darwinists are evil. They don’t want to find a cure for cancer. 7) Religious People Shouldn’t Critique Dr. Dr. Dembski: Yeah! Because ID doesn’t have anything to do with religion (see bullet item #5). Also the guy isn’t even a scientist like Dr. Dr. Dembski who has two PhD’s. One in math and one in religious studies!!!! So keep your mouth shut. He’s a genius. 8) More People are Visiting UD Now: Readership has gone up since we starting getting even wackier. DTard has helped bring in all the wackos. Thanks DTard. (Personal Note: I check the site twice a day purely to see what kind of crazy stuff they have up on the site). Gotta love UD! |
| Date: 2007/02/18 11:29:37, Link 209.216.179.103 |
| Author: hooligans |
| hooligans: NEXT TIME YOU REFER TO THE ISAAC NEWTON OF INFORMTION THEORY, YOU HAD BETTER CALL HIM DR. DR. DEMBSKI. SEE YA HOMO-LIGANS -ds |
| Date: 2007/03/06 15:52:28, Link 168.99.75.193 | ||
| Author: hooligans | ||
|
A quick question for Gil- "Dodging the Question” that wasn't posted on UD. . . . You were talking about O’Leary’s comment regarding “…the mathematical probabilities of Darwinism…” You then stated that:
So how does this support ID? To calculate what you consider the improbablity of Darwinism, has no bearing on the validity of ID . . .. Right? Both Denyse and yourself are saying, “gee it couldn’t of happened this way, so lets just make up a story (ID) and say it happened that way.” Has anyone calculated the probability that an intelligent designer could intelligently design not only various species, but the entire universe? I don’t think so. Another idiotic comment that goes uncontested at UD from Gil "Dodging the Question" |
| Date: 2007/03/08 13:47:14, Link 168.99.75.193 | ||
| Author: hooligans | ||
I love how I got booted over at UD for suggesting to Dr. Dr. Dembski that calling an impartial judge a narcissitic putz was innapropriate and unchristian. Now dembski has the gall to pretend that he has values:
BS. Dembski . . . you are a total fraud! |
| Date: 2007/03/24 18:42:38, Link 209.216.175.163 | ||||
| Author: hooligans | ||||
Best Dembski Post Ever!
Then the Reply is priceless:
Yeah, I ment to make that minor slip up, because it was all part of my grandmaster, dragon-scholar plan. I'm always two or three steps ahead of those clowns like PvM. Ha, fooled him again! |
| Date: 2007/03/24 21:44:38, Link 209.216.184.176 | ||
| Author: hooligans | ||
|
Let the betting begin . . . how long before OilBoy's comments dissapear? I'm saying they are gone before 12:00. You must remember no person can speak low, or question, the great double-reverse secret agent, known as Dr. Dr. Dembski. The great one who plays mind games with us peons has shown everyone up. I must admit he had me totally fooled. Now I realize Darwin is evil and ID is the real deal. He is just too smart for any Darwinist.
|
| Date: 2007/04/19 11:09:54, Link 168.99.75.193 |
| Author: hooligans |
|
I teach middle school science in White Salmon, Washington. As a public school teacher you get some pretty interesting responses to teaching the evolutionary paradigm in biology. I have had a few parents invite me to their churches to hear, the now imprisoned, Kent Hovind speak. I declined, but I regret that now. I would have loved to see a true snake oil salesman do his show. As a teacher you continually have to take courses for professional development, this last spring I took a course at a local community college and was dumbfounded to hear my professor talking about the Great Nochian Flood, the speed of light slowing down, human footprints next to dinosaurs, and radiometric dating inconsistencies. He was a wacko YEC’er. I spent much of my time at TalkOrigins prepping for our next class where I crushed his pathetic talking points. From there I found the Pandas Thumb and this site as well. I have found that 8th graders love to learn about the grand picture of life. The love to understand why nature works the way it does. Truly, nothing in nature makes any sense without an understanding of evolutionary theory. Now when students or parents question the wisdom of teaching evolution to their kids, I simply say that this is the best explanation given the observed evidence. I am greatly indebted to the many wise ones here that have shed light of the subject for me. I must also admit that the antics of the folks at UD are such a crack-up. I just love seeing the gang here just totally crush their idiotic rantings. |
| Date: 2007/06/05 16:55:29, Link 168.99.75.193 |
| Author: hooligans |
| First of all Denyse O'leary is completly too dense to notice the pun. Secondly, how could you all miss that the fact that OE hasn't posted in weeks is clearly proof of a Darwinist Conspiracy to keep people from hearing both sides of the debate. |
| Date: 2007/06/08 22:58:11, Link 209.216.191.199 |
| Author: hooligans |
|
I saw this and followed the link to the "Brites" site: I then thought, "wow even Behe's buddies mock him!" Yeah I know the Brites is supposed to be funny and all, but this is funny for all the wrong reasons. Galapagos Finch is f**king retarded. |
| Date: 2007/06/15 16:06:07, Link 168.99.75.193 |
| Author: hooligans |
|
I can just see Dembski getting all steamed up over the likes of Coyne, Judge Jones, all those Behe haters, and . . . well . . . just about anyone who doesn't bow to his Isaac Newton-like DR. DR. status. Hello!?! This guy just screams out "Napoleonic complex". Dembski thinks to himself:  Unlike Dembski, I use reliable sources to back up my points. According to Conservapedia, a napoleonic complex leads to "overly aggressive tendencies by some to compensate for being short or small. It is not endemic of all short people, and is only relevent for a small number for whom lack of physical stature may lead to difficulties in accepting themselves." Clearly conservapedia is describing Dembski. Here the only difference is that rather than lacking in height, Dembski lacks intellect. Otherwise the resemblance is obvious . . . his overt aggressiveness, when in the safety of his heavily moderated blog(not in public forums like court though) is clearly a sign of one who fels a need to compensate for a small something (intellect in this case). Furthermore, he clearly has difficulty accepting himself. Thus the need to be the Isaac Newton of Information Theory, and get so puffed up about his staus as DR. DR. So while Coyne might be likened to Frankenstein, I think an appropriate image for Dembski would be either the Elmer Fudd imaged above, or the Napoleon Dynamite image here  |
| Date: 2007/06/15 21:21:27, Link 209.216.190.251 |
| Author: hooligans |
|
Sorry to cross post this one from a different thread. It is just too good though . . . I think it is obvious Dembski has a napoleonic Complex. BTW why did Dembski boot bdelloid From the Herman Munster thread? |
| Date: 2007/06/16 13:58:54, Link 168.99.75.193 | ||
| Author: hooligans | ||
What's up with Dembski booting bdelloid? I noticed that not only did this dude get booted, but his comments got delected from the thread. He must have actually posted about Coyne's arguments, rather than just mocking him. After all UD isn't interested in defending Behe with actual EVIDENCE!!!! Mocking people like Judge Jones is the best defense (or not showing up to court cases).
|
| Date: 2007/06/16 21:49:17, Link 209.216.174.233 | ||||
| Author: hooligans | ||||
The Brookfield Institute of Transparadigmic Science is in need of finaincial help . . . .
 The following is an example of the ground breaking research they are delving into
Are negative numbers bad or evil or something? I guess I never knew that a negative number was actually BAD!!! |
| Date: 2007/06/17 18:02:08, Link 209.216.191.188 |
| Author: hooligans |
|
I tried to post on UD to ask Dembski why he thinks this nut at iconrids is so cool. Is it the groundbreaking research Brookfield is conducting? Or what? No surprise my post was not allowed through the filter. It is obvious that damage control is now at full throttle. Basically, he wants to get the post off the page as quickly as possible by posting garbage above it. This huge fiasco, started by Dembski, illustartes the vacuity and desperation of ID right now. Dembski, desperate to find anyone who supports ID, simply is tickled pink every time he sees a person bashing darwinism and suporting ID. So much so that he can't stop the rush of PLEASURE to post online his delightful discovery. His pants are probable still wet from his first read of Pleasurian philsophy. |
| Date: 2007/06/21 15:01:09, Link 168.99.75.193 |
| Author: hooligans |
|
I took a few moments to catalogue both the type and quantity of posts made at UD since April 2007. I didn't count posts in multiple catagories, even though that would make sense. For example, all Denyse O'leary posts were classified in their own category because it doesn't matter what they were about, they are all just f**king crazy sh*t. While I could have also counted them in other categories, like Evolution is Evil, I figured this would just take too much thought and time. I think the results speak clearly . . . UD whines a whole lot, bu they don't do sh*t. ID is Persecuted = 33 Atricles Unwittingly Supporting ID = 17 Global Warming Isn't Happening = 15 Reviews of Popular Books about ID (not peer-reviewed) = 15 Stupid Articles by Denyse = 12 Evolution is Wrong, So ID is Right = 12 Articles That Don't Make Any Sense (not by Denyse) = 9 Davescot Pontificating About Something He Doesn't Understand = 8 Street Theatre = 7 Complaints/Putdowns about Dover or Jones = 5 Evolution is Evil = 5 Teach the Controversy = 5 Jeolousy/Hatred of Dawkins = 4 New Research ID is Thinking About Doing Sometime = 2 ID Supporting Pleasurianism = 1 New Research by ID Scientists = 0 |
| Date: 2007/06/22 21:44:31, Link 209.216.186.186 | ||
| Author: hooligans | ||
Taking bets . . . how long till Brandon gets banned at UD?
|
| Date: 2007/06/23 12:48:04, Link 209.216.190.34 | ||
| Author: hooligans | ||
Over at UD, Davescot pontificates about how conservatives are better at creating high qualtity educational programs . . . but does he know the real story . . .NO! I am an educator and actually know a bit about what he is so stupidly stating. He says:
Little does Davesscot know that George Bush appointed a secretary of education that led Texas to being one of the most "successful" school systems in America. But wait, was it really? Or was it just a sham to get George Bush elected? Oh wait, it was a sham! Thats why Rod Paige is the FORMER Secretary of Education. What did Rod "the Snake" Paige do? One: He pressured superintendants and adminstrators to get the troubled, low kids suspended or missing during testing windows so their scores wouldn't be counted. NO SHIT. Paige manipulated data to make the schools dropout rates look like they were getting better when in fact they were just manpulating the data. See the following story done by 60 minutes The Texas Miricle Here is another good story: Scandel in Education "Miracle" Furthermore, it was revealed (i can't find the story but I did read and remember it) that Texas' standardized test was the easiest in the nation. Thus kids were passing it with flying colors. Low standard equals lot sof kids looking successful. |
| Date: 2007/06/23 13:36:50, Link 209.216.190.34 | ||
| Author: hooligans | ||
Took about 12 hours before Brandon got the "silent boot".
|
| Date: 2007/06/24 11:26:39, Link 209.216.174.220 |
| Author: hooligans |
As I've said before Galapogos Finch has serious problems.  As a middle school science teacher, I can tell you that the same kind of humor displayed by Galapogos Finch is what I observe in disturbed adolescent boys. These are the kind of individuals who make, what they think is a joke, and then the entire class falls silent and stares at them like WTF!?! After class, inevitably, a student comes up and says, "little William is kind a creepy." |
| Date: 2007/06/26 15:01:36, Link 168.99.75.193 | ||
| Author: hooligans | ||
Wow Dembski has really hit the jackpot now!! I can't belive it!?! In no less than two weeks he has linked to a holocaust denier and a wacked out PLeasurian philosopher. Found a translation from Right Wing Professor website of this guy who is being persucuted in Germany:
|
| Date: 2007/07/01 22:23:25, Link 209.216.186.214 | ||||
| Author: hooligans | ||||
Just picked up this old post from miniTARD Gil:
Gee Gil-tard, what happened to the concept of falsifibility? You know the whole philosphy of science thingy? You know
source wikipedia According to Gil-tard Darwinists got it all wrong. But gee, according to the philsophy of science those pesky Darwinists must have a powerful theory. It must hurt to be so stupid..... |
| Date: 2007/07/08 10:58:58, Link 209.216.183.143 | ||
| Author: hooligans | ||
WAD questions?
If it is, I have to wonder what all those UDer's do when it is time to investigate the offspring of Pleasurianism? |
| Date: 2007/07/08 11:03:19, Link 209.216.183.143 | ||
| Author: hooligans | ||
Holy Moly!!!! This has got to be such a bit of mud in Dembski's Eye!!!;)
OK I had fun being IrishFather412 for a bit. But now the cover is blown and I am banned for shedding light on one of Dembski's own links. Wow shouldn't they be banning Dembski instead of me? |
| Date: 2007/07/10 10:05:40, Link 168.99.75.193 | ||||
| Author: hooligans | ||||
|
Would you pass Dembski's Final Exam on Rhetoric? I especially like this question:
Here is another great question from his class about Intelligent Design. I'm wondering what counts as a correct answer, seeing that I can't think of a way to answer the question without running away. Oh wait, Dembski did run away from the Dover Trial. He must of not got any good material from his students to use in the trial. Here is the essaay prompt:
|
| Date: 2007/07/11 00:33:55, Link 209.216.183.17 | ||
| Author: hooligans | ||
Dembski's tagline/quote was the first thing I noticed when I vivited his website for his academic courses. I thought, "wow, and this guy is teaching science!?!
|
| Date: 2007/07/11 20:04:22, Link 209.216.190.14 |
| Author: hooligans |
| Has anyone considered opening JAM's eyes to the world of The Banned? He is Now With the BANNED! |
| Date: 2007/07/12 10:11:55, Link 168.99.75.193 |
| Author: hooligans |
|
Seriously, does anyone else see the striking, and I mean striking resemblance Dembski and his minions have with a group of little kids? Evidence: 1. Stupid infantile humor (farty jokes) 2. Refusing to listen (JAM kicked their collectives asses, but they never could hear what he was actually saying) 3. Taking their ball and going home (JAM and Patrick are no longer with us) when they are losing. 4. Taunting (neener, neener JAM sucks) when someone can’t defend themselves 5. Active imaginations (we are smart and know stuff) What is crazy is that these little hits of juvenile behavior are, in themselves, quite revealing, but when you look at the pattern of behavior over time, the comparison of the tards at UD to a pack of idiotic children is striking.  |
| Date: 2007/07/13 13:17:46, Link 209.216.175.61 |
| Author: hooligans |
|
I posted this on PT but thought I'd add it here as well: I can see that the DI and this teacher from Tacoma are trying to shave as close as possible to what is allowed. The key reason I object to this "teach the controversy" concept is because a better approach is to teach what is understood and admit ignorance when you don't know the answer. Virtually all controversy is born from a lack of knowledge about a particular subject. In science, the best method for reducing controversy is to review what is known and then set about filling in the gaps of knowledge through research. What this text, Explore Evolution, attempts to do is use the gaps of knowledge to create controversy where none should exist. Instead, a sound educatinal program would teach what is known and understood and make clear where and what is not known or what is still unclear. This way future biologists can form ideas of how best to apply their research and labrotory skills in college and in life. More important than teachimg any controversy is teaching kids how to actually conduct labrotory investigations and how to use the scienctific method. If you need to teach the controversy to get kids excited about science, your not much of a teacher. |
| Date: 2007/07/13 20:40:37, Link 209.216.183.19 | ||
| Author: hooligans | ||
EE states that:
Ah yes, yet another example of an argument from ignorance. Hmm, too bad for EE progress is being made in understanding this perplexing problem. Check out this article entitled South Pacific Plant May Be Missing Link In Evolution Of Flowering Plants. The problem with EE is that it tries to stimulate controversy where, instead, a teacher should stimulate a thirst to understand what is known and where the gaps in knowledge are. This way students will be able to do research to help find answers. |
| Date: 2007/07/13 22:29:05, Link 209.216.183.19 | ||
| Author: hooligans | ||
More from Dr. Dr. Dembski's syllabi at Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary. This one really made me chuckle:
Week 1: Flash animations and farty jokes Week 2: Strategies for banning people who know too much Week 3: How to avoid public court cases where you have to tell the truth Care to imagine the ret of the semester? |
| Date: 2007/07/14 21:18:41, Link 209.216.191.182 | ||||||
| Author: hooligans | ||||||
Why are they quoting the Science Framework for California Schools from 1990 in EE? I couldn't find anything on the framework from 1990. However I did find this gem on page ix of the 2004 framework :
and
I'm wondering how the 2004 frameworks mesh with what EE is trying to convey. Too me it looks like the California standards are well written and clear. I'm also wondering how the DI can support secret research labs in light of what I read in the 2004 Science Framework for California Schools on page 20:
|
| Date: 2007/07/16 14:42:56, Link 168.99.75.193 |
| Author: hooligans |
|
Can anyone summarize Dembski's Jesus Tomb Math? I'm no mathematician and frankly have no idea what they are trying to prove. How is it related to ID? Also what is this Evolutionary Infomatics lab and how is it related to the Jesus Tomb Math on the website. Help I don't understand! |
| Date: 2007/07/17 18:54:43, Link 209.216.183.150 |
| Author: hooligans |
|
Hey Mr. Paul Nelson, I am a science teacher in the state of Washington and would love a review copy of EE. How can I get one? |
| Date: 2007/07/17 21:42:54, Link 209.216.183.150 |
| Author: hooligans |
| DONT YOU HOMOS KNOW THAT I CAN CURE CANCER WIHT MY WRIST?!!? DCA AND SEMUN WILL DO THE JOB EVRY TIME! |
| Date: 2007/07/22 20:10:02, Link 209.216.186.32 |
| Author: hooligans |
|
I believe that EE will be taught at this school: Feel free to warn the administrators that they are about to get sued. Curtis High School 8425 40th Street W University Place, WA 98466 Phone: (253) 566-5710; Fax: (253)566-5626 Attendance: 566-5715 Athletics: 566-5718 Guidance: 566-5713 David Hammond, Principal Terry Jenks, Asst. Principal &Athletic Dir. Jeff Johnson , Asst. Principal Rosalynn McKenna, Asst. Principal Ron Brock, Coordinator Student Discipline |
| Date: 2007/07/26 10:59:46, Link 209.216.179.22 | ||
| Author: hooligans | ||
I love your sense of humor DR. Dr. D!!! Haha Haha . . . . . At the Dover Trial people from both sides were put on the stands and asked hot questions. I thought you were going to deliver some pure capsiacan? What happened to your vice strategy? I think that the record shows the only people who couldn't handle the heat of pure capsiacan were those on the losing side. I read the trial transcripts, and it played out like Spurs-Cavaliers series. Total domination . . . pure capsiacan. You got ganked. You got pawned. So go ahead, ask tough questions that have nothing to do with science and everything to do with politics. That's all you have after all. |
| Date: 2007/07/26 12:18:18, Link 209.216.179.22 |
| Author: hooligans |
| Check out the questions at UD!! LOL!!! They are so f**king stupid!! |
| Date: 2007/07/27 18:59:34, Link 209.216.191.234 |
| Author: hooligans |
| I've adopted pseudonymes and got my foot in the door by saying outrageous stuff that I knwo they will love. I then slowly step up the satire until I get banned. It's fun. |
| Date: 2007/07/27 21:10:02, Link 209.216.191.234 | ||
| Author: hooligans | ||
Arden asked . . .
Yeah... IrishFather412 made a few stupid remarks and then up'd the tard to the point of edgy satire. Now IrishFather412 can't seem to get a comment through moderation. The last comment which was not posted had something to do with a Dembski post about how you can judge an idea based on what kind of philosophies stem from it. I basically said, "yeah speaking of which has anyone checked out ICON-Rids and Pleasurianism?" This comment didn't make it rhough moderation. |
| Date: 2007/08/08 20:24:55, Link 209.216.183.114 |
| Author: hooligans |
| Quick Paul Nelson is back from Rome and can finally use the internet. Je jas spent his time posting pictures of half naked darwinists. Way to go Paul! You rock. Now, about EE . . . |
| Date: 2007/08/13 15:20:40, Link 209.216.174.89 | ||
| Author: hooligans | ||
Sometimes, I am a bit slow, but this bit from Davetard struck me as unusual.
Haven't black holes been observed? Am I crazy, or am I missing something here? Is Davetard just stupid or did I read his post wrong. |
| Date: 2007/08/15 10:37:19, Link 209.216.169.8 | ||
| Author: hooligans | ||
Mentok and his pals at UD hit the hard stuff: Dude . . . like
Isn't that like far out (cough, cough). That's some chronic sticky Moroccan. |
| Date: 2007/08/16 12:58:42, Link 209.216.187.149 | ||
| Author: hooligans | ||
Okay! Which one of you went undercover to post this nugget?
Is this rich TARD or what? |
| Date: 2007/08/22 15:40:58, Link 209.216.183.103 | ||
| Author: hooligans | ||
Latest Paul Nelson sighting:
are you ready to discuss anything Paul? |
| Date: 2007/08/22 21:37:48, Link 209.216.183.103 | ||
| Author: hooligans | ||
We all know Dembski is a wanker. So let's see if you can pass yet another tough quiz from the Master Wanker. This question comes from his 2006 Christian Apologetics Class he taught at that 2nd rate bible school.
Dembski!?! shouldn't you, like, figure this stuff out and actually apply to your own life? |
| Date: 2007/08/22 21:40:53, Link 209.216.183.103 | ||
| Author: hooligans | ||
Another wonderful question from the same class:
Dembski!?! what happened at Dover man? |
| Date: 2007/08/23 10:55:12, Link 209.216.186.141 | ||
| Author: hooligans | ||
I was just reading an the article in National Geographic when I came across this passage about education in Pakistan:
Ahh yes! Gotta love that fundie education! Having recently finished the Republican War on Science I have no doubt that it wouldn't be hard to create a country of morons very quickly. GW, and his cronies, are frightening. My theory is that all the policies put into place since GW took office are there to privatize education. In the state of Washington, where I am a science teacher, the Evergreen Freedom Foundation recieves a lot of funding from the Walmart family to destroy our unions and privatize public education. Why? Hmmm. . . . Follow the money . . . most of a states budget is spent on education money not going to line the pockets of the Walmart family. What do they want? They want a crack at all that money. The No Child Left Behind Act ensures that all schools will be labeled as failing by the year 2011. This will create the illusion that schools suck and need to be privatized. Once privatized Walmart will open schools using their business model and rake in the cash while giving our children a crappy education. Soon Dembski's dumbass quizzes will be standard test prompts. Soon teh correct answer will be Goddunit. |
| Date: 2007/09/03 16:46:28, Link 209.216.179.56 | ||
| Author: hooligans | ||
Beat me to the unusual observation. I was wondering . . . is there no end to the various posting pseudonymes Dembski uses to create TARD? Must he post under the guise "Galapago Finch" when producing unhumorous TARD? Must he post under teh name "Botnik" when creating spiteful TARD? |
| Date: 2007/09/07 19:11:37, Link 209.216.175.110 | ||
| Author: hooligans | ||
I wrote about the EFF awhile back. I'm a science teacher from Washington. They are funded primarily by the Walton family (Walmart) and, I believe ,are trying to privatize schools not to teach creationism, but rather to profit from opening schools based on their efficient business model. I realize this is just pure speculation. But when you follow the money and you combine the political push and policies implemented by conseravtives. They all point towardds privatizing public education. Why? Most of a states budget is spent on providing education. A free public education. Wouldn't it be nice to privatize it and make crap loads of money? Thats what teh EFF and Walmart wants. I swear it. |
| Date: 2007/09/09 11:02:36, Link 209.216.183.192 | ||
| Author: hooligans | ||
Did anyone else notice the tagline/disclaimer at the bottom of the EvIL Webpage:
So to review . . . the material on "this web site" doesn't represent the views of anyone?!?! :O |
| Date: 2007/09/09 22:30:11, Link 209.216.184.180 |
| Author: hooligans |
| Neal is Dembski releasing all of his pent up anger. Wouldn't you be angry if every time you opened your mouth you made of fool of yourself? |
| Date: 2007/09/13 19:44:20, Link 209.216.175.218 | ||
| Author: hooligans | ||
I have done a quick analysis of O'leary's blog. My conclusion is that Dense doesn't get out much and she never talks to real people.
|
| Date: 2007/09/15 10:26:46, Link 209.216.183.146 |
| Author: hooligans |
| Captain, she can't take anymore tard! UD is down. |
| Date: 2007/09/20 21:50:37, Link 209.216.169.73 |
| Author: hooligans |
| I'm getting impatient!!! Where is the transcript of Dembski at OU? I can't wait to read or hear the event. I want to laugh at him. He is sooooooo stoooooopid. I wish I was there! |
| Date: 2007/09/21 17:30:55, Link 168.99.75.193 | ||
| Author: hooligans | ||
Had to save this gem from Rob before it gets deleted.
|
| Date: 2007/09/21 20:36:23, Link 209.216.186.27 | ||||
| Author: hooligans | ||||
Why isn't Dembski posting links to the letter to teh editor at The Lariet? Could it be that the letters basically say that Dembski is a loser? Why yes:
|
| Date: 2007/09/22 15:11:35, Link 209.216.190.36 | ||
| Author: hooligans | ||
Wait! Wait! I know! Dembski won't answer this question, because the lab didn't actually exist! There was no equipment because you can't test ID. There was no staff, because nobody was interested or had any expertise. The only signs of the lab, are what got created in Dembski's warped mind. Dembski, if you read this, you know I'm right. You know there was no equipment, no space, no staff, there was no thought, no testable hypothesis. You know you won't answer this question because it will reveal that there was nothing get all worked up over at Baylor. This is all just more PR. You are a fool. |
| Date: 2007/09/22 19:44:54, Link 209.216.191.247 |
| Author: hooligans |
|
Hey Ftk , Can youfind out what Dembski's take on his pantsing at OU is? Thanks |
| Date: 2007/10/30 19:52:22, Link 209.216.173.28 | ||
| Author: hooligans | ||
I love visiting Dembki's classroom website. It is a view into the crazy world he lives in as a teacher at SWBTS here is teh midterm study exam:
|
| Date: 2007/11/12 13:36:00, Link 209.216.175.166 |
| Author: hooligans |
| Ans so far his response is all science . . . yeah right! |
| Date: 2007/11/17 19:24:14, Link 209.216.169.179 | ||
| Author: hooligans | ||
Yet Again . . .
|
| Date: 2007/11/18 19:10:30, Link 209.216.174.134 | ||
| Author: hooligans | ||
Will BA77 bite at the selection of gibberish that I posted under a pseudonym?
So far I've got a nibble. Lets see. I think we really ought to do more gibberish posts at UD and see how they respond. So far BA77 is using caution. |
| Date: 2007/12/17 11:17:08, Link 209.216.191.134 |
| Author: hooligans |
|
ERv, Ouchh! Full on backbreaker  |
| Date: 2007/12/19 20:25:03, Link 209.216.169.188 | ||
| Author: hooligans | ||
Dembski seez:
WTF!?! This dude clearly lives in a closet! I was still wondering how long it took to move the lab off of Baylor's campus?  How long could it take to unplug the computer and move it to another broom-closet off campus? |
| Date: 2007/12/23 11:26:32, Link 209.216.182.108 | ||
| Author: hooligans | ||
|
We have a blue-light special on TARD on aisle 7! idnet.com.au
WTF does this have to do with anything. Wow! "I've read Dawkins and the Koran." This sounds like your standard freshman philosophy wannabe spouting off at your local liberal arts college drum circle. "I've also read Dostoevsky. Did you also know I am a vegan-marxist-pacifist. By the way I wrote a book report about Darwin's famous book and got it published online!" |
| Date: 2007/12/28 18:53:14, Link 209.216.191.16 | ||
| Author: hooligans | ||
Is the fossil record complete? Do we have Paul Nelson sightings recorded each time he visits, or is it possible that some of his visits go unrecorded in the fossil record? I don't know . . . ask DaveScot
|
| Date: 2007/12/28 19:01:55, Link 209.216.191.16 |
| Author: hooligans |
|
Paul Nelson, If your able to post becasue your not in Italy where they have no internet could you give us an update about the debate page on the Explore Evolution website. So far there is nothing. How is that public school teacher from Tacoma doing using the new textbook? Could you give us an update? |
| Date: 2008/01/10 17:24:33, Link 168.99.75.193 |
| Author: hooligans |
| You could take an online course from Dr. Dr. D! Wow. Now that would be so cool! |
| Date: 2008/01/15 12:10:16, Link 168.99.75.193 |
| Author: hooligans |
| hi |
| Date: 2008/01/15 13:32:14, Link 168.99.75.193 |
| Author: hooligans |
|
I done did an FtK an done gone an deleted my comment and replaced it with a "hi" so as to protect my secret identity at the tardfest going on at UD Edit: I done gone and used my edit button yehhaaa! |
| Date: 2008/01/17 09:42:17, Link 168.99.75.193 |
| Author: hooligans |
|
Censorship! Censorship! All of Shoghi's insightful comments related to frontloading and the development of predictions in ID have done gone and been dissapeared. I was personally offended that his experiment related to spider propagation in a novel environment was considered beneath those at UD. Holy crap, they will allow comments related to forcefields around DNA!! Please!!! I mean come on, a middle school student who gets censored for expressing ID views at UD. This has got to be brought to the attention of the Expelled Producers. |
| Date: 2008/01/17 11:56:09, Link 168.99.75.193 |
| Author: hooligans |
| I wonder if the great Dr. Dr. was busy at the Jesus Tomb Conference? Time Story on Jesus Tomb Math that uses statistics. |
| Date: 2008/01/21 19:18:26, Link 209.216.175.21 | ||
| Author: hooligans | ||
Crazy, that Shoghi came up with the same idea with his spider experiment. His post got deleted. Now PaV has stolen that middle schoolers ideas and used them for himself.
|
| Date: 2008/01/27 11:01:52, Link 209.216.186.232 | ||
| Author: hooligans | ||
Thought P said:
That's the way most math teachers go about it nowadays. Except at our school we teach these concepts at the 8th grade. |
| Date: 2008/01/28 13:42:06, Link 209.216.187.59 |
| Author: hooligans |
| There has got to be a Dembski meltdown soon. The pressure has been building for awhile. |
| Date: 2008/01/28 17:01:25, Link 209.216.187.59 | ||
| Author: hooligans | ||
I know, that you know, that the reference works on multiple levels. You know how Vanilla Ice stole that riff for his hit song "Ice, Ice Baby" or whatever. Just like Dembski is a mass plagarizer!!!! Ha Ha Ha! You crazy insane1 |
| Date: 2008/02/01 21:15:08, Link 209.216.186.121 |
| Author: hooligans |
|
Paul, How come there is no discussion of EE at the webpage? I thought the whole point was for the book to foster debate. How is that teacher from Tacoma doing using the new text? How come his students are not posting questions and debating on the website? Are any other public schools using the text? Why is the second edition already in the works? |
| Date: 2008/02/14 19:43:42, Link 209.216.169.128 | ||
| Author: hooligans | ||
Curious. I never really understood the inanity of WmaD arguments regarding information until now. Before I just let you all interpret the tard for me. Now I get it straight from master. Wow. I'm buzzing with tard. WmaD seez:
"In consequence . . . . goddidit." How the hell does he get from his first statement of "evolution requires an information source" to "goddidit? I just don't understand. |
| Date: 2008/02/16 17:16:23, Link 209.216.186.57 | ||
| Author: hooligans | ||
|
| Date: 2008/02/29 21:45:19, Link 209.216.181.10 |
| Author: hooligans |
|
Turncoat, Did you actually step foot into the lab? Did you see photos of the equipment? What kind of staff does the lab employ? |
| Date: 2008/03/10 22:04:56, Link 209.216.179.96 | ||
| Author: hooligans | ||
I am impressed with chuckhumpry's ability at sockpuppetry.
Yeah DLH . . . where is the positive evidence that shows how the CSI has been calculated for a known designed object? I want to see that. |
| Date: 2008/03/13 11:21:30, Link 168.99.75.193 | ||||
| Author: hooligans | ||||
|
Mr. Nelson, I was wondering what you have to say about this issue IN EE I posted back in August:
Any thoughts? Edited to fix quotes |
| Date: 2008/03/13 11:48:35, Link 168.99.75.193 | ||
| Author: hooligans | ||
|
Mr. Nelson, Given the quote from EE mentioned above regarding the evolution of flowering plants, how will you incorporate new data rolling in related to this issue?
Thanks edited to add link |
| Date: 2008/03/15 22:53:09, Link 209.216.187.229 | ||
| Author: hooligans | ||
|
Mr. Nelson, Would you mind updating us on the following article from Student News Daily. It stated back in August that:
Hows that little experiment going? |
| Date: 2008/03/15 22:54:06, Link 209.216.187.229 |
| Author: hooligans |
| Are you going to give him a new set of textbooks for free given all the mistakes in the first edition? |
| Date: 2008/03/20 09:39:55, Link 168.99.75.193 |
| Author: hooligans |
|
Paul, What about the evolution of flowering plants? I'm curious to find out what you think of the current state of research in that field. |
| Date: 2008/03/23 12:57:56, Link 209.216.175.72 |
| Author: hooligans |
|
What is the real issue? To me it seems like the issue is as follows: 1: You made a movie wherein those asked to do interviews where asked to do so under false pretenses. You knew they would never agree to a partake in a ID/Creationist piece of propaganda, so you tricked them. 2: Your movie is just plain bad. 3: You are saying that ID has nothing to do with religion, but your actions and connections say otherwise 4: During a free screening PZ was expelled for no apparent reason. Those responsible, lied about why he was expelled. They got caught lying. 5: Your movie tries to conflate Hitler and Genocide with "Darwinism". But it doesn't examine the relationship between Hitler and Religion. Why? I thought you just wanted to look at all the angles? 6: Finally, you are a tool |
| Date: 2008/03/23 13:03:52, Link 209.216.175.72 |
| Author: hooligans |
| Ha Ha. All three of us wondered the same thing. I guess when something is just too obvious it makes sense. |
| Date: 2008/04/03 16:09:58, Link 168.99.75.193 | ||
| Author: hooligans | ||
I second the comment of Mr. Christopher:
Yes Kevin. Please tell us about the evidence that is being supressed. I assume that because you just finished making a movie about people who have had their ideas supressed in academic circles, you can give us a list of the ideas that caused this supression. Please be detailed enough so that we can examine the ideas themselves. |
| Date: 2008/04/05 09:47:26, Link 209.216.187.30 | ||
| Author: hooligans | ||
I think Kevin was trying to make a funny. But, alas, the question goes unanswered. Furthermore, I second, again, oldmanintheskydidit's request to show us what other evidence has been suppressed by academia. Seriously, we should know this. Please inform us. Right now, I am unaware of any data collected that put into doubt evolution's power to explain the diversity of creatures on our planet. |
| Date: 2008/04/17 09:48:35, Link 168.99.75.193 | ||||||||||
| Author: hooligans | ||||||||||
|
Paul, I know your busy, but I have a few questions for you related to EE that have yet to be addressed. Here they are:
AND
AND Mr. Nelson, I was wondering what you have to say about this issue IN EE I posted back in July:
Thanks for looking into these questions. I'm real curios if you talk about the evolution of flowering plants. Apparently quite a bit of work has been accomplished recently that helps answer this tough question. |
| Date: 2008/04/18 16:39:15, Link 168.99.75.193 | ||
| Author: hooligans | ||
Here's another review from FlickFilosopher.com:
Gotta love that review! |
| Date: 2008/04/18 20:08:22, Link 209.216.181.71 |
| Author: hooligans |
|
Thanks Casey! I haven't said much about you, but I sure thought some bad things about you. You are dishonest. Virtually everything that comes from your mouth is a lie. Have a nice day. |
| Date: 2008/04/23 11:42:45, Link 168.99.75.193 |
| Author: hooligans |
|
My questions, Paul, should only take a second to answer. Would you mind? I'm curious. Just look up the board for full questions. To summarize: 1: How is Cowan doing with EE? Are you giving him a new set of texts, given the vast quantity of errors in the 1st edition? 2: Flowering plants. What's up witht the new research that appears to cast doubt on the wording you use in EE regarding their evolution? Will you incorporate some of these ideas? Why or why not? Thanks |
| Date: 2008/04/29 15:19:09, Link 168.99.75.193 |
| Author: hooligans |
|
Mr. Nelson, I am still curious about how well the EE textbook was recieved at Curtis Highschool in Tacoma. Did Doug Cowan give you favorable reviews and feedback for the next edition? He endorsed your book early on, but now that the school year is almost over, and given the huge quantity of errors in the 1st edition, will he be given a new set of texts? Furthermore, I thought the whole point of the debate page on the EE website was to offer a forum to debate the ideas outlined in the text. Why is it that no students are using the forum to debate the topics outlined in the text? I would at least expect some homeschool groups to be using it. Could you also get back to me about hte flowering plants? Thanks, Mike |
| Date: 2008/05/21 12:05:28, Link 168.99.75.193 | ||
| Author: hooligans | ||
Alan Fox said
Could we organize a one-two week period wherein all sock puppets do not particiate at UD. Or even more radically, a complete no-peeky at UD for a one-two week period? I know it would be hard for all you tard addicts, but think of how their traffic would fall!!!! Any other people curious to see this happen? I am |
| Date: 2008/05/30 14:58:58, Link 168.99.75.193 | ||
| Author: hooligans | ||
|
I'm curious if anyone has bothered to check in with some of hte people who endorsed the 1st version of Explore Evolution. One was Doug Cowan from George R. Curtis Senior High School Biology near Tacoma, WA. He said:
His email is dcowan AT upsd DOT wednet DOT edu. The department chair of biology at his school is Peter Heussman. His email is pheussman AT upsd DOT wednet DOT edu I happen to know that they are doing a textbook adoption this year. I wonder, now that the year is over, if Explore Evolution was one of the texts piloted? I wonder what decision was made? I wonder what feedback Doug Cowan or Peter Heussman have for Paul Nelson. Perhaps someone should enquire? I'm rather shy. |
| Date: 2008/06/11 16:38:10, Link 168.99.75.193 | ||
| Author: hooligans | ||
I thought I'd Highlight Davescottttt's dangerous liasons with gravity. This was back when I first commented on UD. I knew virtually nothing about ID. I love it when he say's back in June of 2006 :
|
| Date: 2008/06/13 14:35:35, Link 168.99.75.193 | ||
| Author: hooligans | ||
Perhaps one of the funniest posts I have ever read from Sal:
This guy is so delusional it makes me laugh. He Sal, if you're going to win the youth over, how about starting by getting more than 1 comment per week at Overwhelming Evidence. Another funny picture . . . misinformed youth speaking up in high school and college classes trying to show off how smart they got while watching some crazy preacher in the basement of their local church. Wow! Sal, I'm shaking in my boots already. |
| Date: 2008/06/17 14:28:01, Link 168.99.75.193 |
| Author: hooligans |
| Thanks for the assinine tag. I also checked it off. Don't forget to check of fugly sweater as well!!! LOL |
| Date: 2008/06/30 18:41:08, Link 209.216.186.145 |
| Author: hooligans |
| uhh . . . lcd . . . Dembski pioneered childish tantrums . . . matter o'fact, he is often referred to as the "Dick Buttkiss of childish humor/tantrums". Some call him the Isaac Newton of Infantile Behavior. To further educate yourself on his childish tactics I suggest you read John Kwok's review of the new book. It gives a good overview. Or you can dig into the tard mines here at AtBC and find it all. |
| Date: 2008/07/02 22:08:29, Link 209.216.179.214 |
| Author: hooligans |
| I just need to say that the Amazon page for Dembski's new book makes me chuckle aloud each time I look at it. The tags on it are a crack up. Poor Dembski. He has a pack of scrub jays hounding his every move. I love that. You will fail dembski . . . you are just a grown up version of the kid we tied to the leaky downspout during a torrential downpour. We enjoy picking on you because you're such an easy target. |
| Date: 2009/06/07 22:44:58, Link 209.216.183.254 |
| Author: hooligans |
| Great advertisements on UD . . . I bet all the guys there actually think these women will stay married to them. Women of China |
| Date: 2009/07/05 22:32:50, Link 209.216.169.165 | ||
| Author: hooligans | ||
Thought this was Funny . . .
|
| Date: 2009/07/21 14:24:48, Link 209.216.181.158 | ||
| Author: hooligans | ||
Roasting Gil .. . AGAIN!! LOL!!!
|
| Date: 2009/07/24 12:40:19, Link 209.216.169.31 |
| Author: hooligans |
|
Check out this interesting find. Every once in awhile I'll check out Dembski's syllabi that he puts online at his Design Inference website. he is teaching a new undergraduate course and ID an UNintelligent Evolution. First off, does he think that just because evolution doesn't have the word intelligent in it makes it dumb and that becasue ID does that makes it smart. I think he is dumb. Second, he requires students to create "At least 10 posts defending aspects of the Christian worldview totaling at least 3,000 words on “hostile” websites — 10 percent positive. " No wonder there has been a sharp uptick in tard the last year. |
| Date: 2009/07/24 12:43:49, Link 209.216.169.31 | ||
| Author: hooligans | ||
Oh yeah . . he also deals with some special needs students:
Damn, that must be his whole class!!!! They are already going to Southwest Tardilogical Seminary. |
| Date: 2009/07/24 12:48:29, Link 209.216.169.31 | ||
| Author: hooligans | ||
Dembskis apologetics Final Exam . . .
|
| Date: 2009/07/27 16:33:16, Link 209.216.186.101 | ||||||||
| Author: hooligans | ||||||||
|
Uh oh! The evil materialist forces have mounted against Dr. Hunter . . . How will he respond? I predict he will ban Khan, who has throughly thrashed him on the subject of how evolution is just like religion . . . The last three comments on UD put Dr. Hunter in a difficult place: Khan corners the opponent . .
utidjian lays down the backbreaker
ScottAndrews brings the hurt . . .
90 DegreeAngel sez it like it is . . .
|
| Date: 2009/07/28 15:01:05, Link 71.54.199.83 |
| Author: hooligans |
| Silent ban of 90DegreeAngel was recorded for challenging Corny Hunter regarding religious nature of evolution. |
| Date: 2009/08/10 17:36:00, Link 209.216.179.41 | ||||
| Author: hooligans | ||||
First of all, I just wanted to say that I was the one to point out Dembski's kooky teaching methods. I was waiting to see his response and . . . yes it has arrived! My favorite part:
The Irony !!!! LOL . . Man . .. you cannot make up that kind of delsional wackiness. AWWW poor Dembski got his panties in a bunch becasue his students might get banned for debating ideas!!! HAHAHAHAH you are completly MAD, MAD, MAd Update: 1st post on the thread:
|
=====