I've wondered where all the money that I've been sending out into the internet has been going. Apparently, DaveScot's pocket. We've been had!
form_srcid: bourgeois_rage
form_cmd: view_author
Your IP address is 38.107.191.98
View Author detected.
view author posts:
Retrieve source record and display it.
form_author:
form_srcid: bourgeois_rage
q: SELECT AUTHOR, MEMBER_NAME, IP_ADDR, POST_DATE, TOPIC_ID, t1.FORUM_ID, POST, POST_ID, FORUM_VIEW_THREADS from ib_forum_posts AS t1 LEFT JOIN (ib_member_profiles AS t2, ib_forum_info AS t3) ON (t1.forum_id = t3.forum_id AND t1.author = t2.member_id) WHERE MEMBER_NAME like 'bourgeois_rage%' and forum_view_threads LIKE '*' ORDER BY POST_DATE ASC
DB_err:
DB_result: Resource id #4
| Date: 2006/03/29 10:10:08, Link 207.250.7.194 | ||
| Author: bourgeois_rage | ||
|
Greetings: I have been reading this thread for quite some time now, and I find it quite humorous. Not to derail Arden's current foray at UD, but I saw this quote and knew you guys would appreciate it.
33% right, I'd say. http://www.uncommondescent.com/index.php/archives/967#comment-29307 |
| Date: 2006/03/30 04:58:36, Link 207.250.7.194 | ||||
| Author: bourgeois_rage | ||||
DaveSlot strikes again
First Newman writes nursery rhymes, and is obviously a quack. Dave must have figured that the argument is complete bunk from the get go.
Oh, wait! Did you say that you have a doctorate from a big name school? Well obviously, my first statement was an emotional statement. Now that I have thought it thru, there is clearly some merit to you arguments, Dr. Newman. *cough* Appeal to Authority *cough* Ad Hominem *cough* Excuse me, I don't know what overcame me. Was this too obvious to even point out? |
| Date: 2006/03/30 10:14:02, Link 207.250.7.194 |
| Author: bourgeois_rage |
| The "abject" comment was there at 10:58 this morning, when I posted on this thread. Page 64, 10 posts from the bottom. |
| Date: 2006/04/05 08:16:10, Link 207.250.7.194 |
| Author: bourgeois_rage |
|
I was just about to post that here, Wes. Just more evidence that DaveSLoT doesn't read any more than he wants to read. If he just looked back a few posts on Ed's site he would have answered his questions on his own. I guess he just doesn't get that answering everyone of his idiotic questions that he could have looked up himself isn't intellectually stimulating for the science community, but it is high comedy. |
| Date: 2006/04/05 09:11:40, Link 207.250.7.194 |
| Author: bourgeois_rage |
|
Pardon my ignorance, but since when has tenure been a democratic process? Is there evidence of anyone ever gaining tenure through public petition? |
| Date: 2006/04/05 10:07:55, Link 207.250.7.194 | ||
| Author: bourgeois_rage | ||
Looks like DonaldM is slow on the uptake. http://www.uncommondescent.com/index.php/archives/997 |
| Date: 2006/04/11 02:00:36, Link 207.250.7.194 | ||
| Author: bourgeois_rage | ||
Thanks, I enjoyed googling "DaveScot". I know this isn't news, but I found this comment amusing.
Click to see I find it amusing how less than a year ago, it is the equivalent of sticking your fingers in your ears, but now it is standard policy at Pissant. |
| Date: 2006/04/12 02:07:13, Link 207.250.7.194 |
| Author: bourgeois_rage |
| So we just need to find a case where "Things have not happened" to falsify ID? |
| Date: 2006/04/13 01:51:42, Link 207.250.7.194 |
| Author: bourgeois_rage |
|
How are they making money off of us? Are any of us buying Dembski's books, or clicking on his advertisements? I've wondered where all the money that I've been sending out into the internet has been going. Apparently, DaveScot's pocket. We've been had! |
| Date: 2006/04/13 09:15:53, Link 207.250.7.194 | ||
| Author: bourgeois_rage | ||
Uncommonly Dumb
I'm surprised this hasn't been noted yet. Agnostic? Sounds like he has to keep beating himself over his head to make sure that he is still agnostic. Oh and apparently Adam is the first vertebrate. |
| Date: 2006/04/14 12:48:39, Link 65.29.223.114 | ||||
| Author: bourgeois_rage | ||||
|
Dante: Here's the link to the quote from my post at the top of page 80. Uncommonly Dumb Did any one else notice the the new ads on the site? First one says:
Second:
Third is just a link to another ID blog. But I thought there was no God in ID? Just like there's no crying in baseball. |
| Date: 2006/04/18 07:32:04, Link 207.250.7.194 |
| Author: bourgeois_rage |
|
Nice. You know, if the IDiots joined SETI they would have claimed that they found intelligence long ago. Just turn on a radio and you can hear all the static. It is incredibly complex and must have been designed. They just haven't decoded it yet. |
| Date: 2006/04/18 07:51:37, Link 207.250.7.194 |
| Author: bourgeois_rage |
|
T-Rex didn't breath fire. Clearly you haven't done any research. And now you won't breath anything at all after I puncture your lungs just like I did to PZ. -ds What happened to Barry? The same thing that's going to happen to you! -ds |
| Date: 2006/04/20 02:39:10, Link 207.250.7.194 |
| Author: bourgeois_rage |
|
I am a computer engineer and was brought to this debate by the ID side trying to convince me that biologists were hiding facts. After some very convincing arguments and actually beginning to doubt the biologist's explanation, I started to do some of my own research. What I found was that the ID community was primarily driven not by evidence, but religion. In fact the people who originaly tried to convince me of ID (and claimed that it wasn't religious) were clearly very religious people. ID could very well have some good points, but they try to claim things that they cannot prove. Plus instead of releasing studies, often they only released press releases in response to scientist's studies. Evolution does not make any claims beyond that which they can show within reason. ID activists claim that Evolution wants to make claims about the origins of life, but the evidence for the origins of life is very sparse and the theory of evolution doesn't touch it because it is so sparse. Occasionally someone does some experiements on how life could have intially formed, but as of yet no conclusions have been drawn, and certainly this is outside of the scope of evolution. After doing my own research I found that ID's view of evolution tends to be mostly misconceptions and strawmen. To me, this is not a convincing argument, and if I may be so bold, it should not be a convincing argument to anyone. The people who believe in ID WANT to believe. Scientists should not allow their emotions to become involved with the search for facts. As for myself, I attend church weekly, but remain agnostic. I could probably discuss the Bible and philosophy with the best if I were so inclined, but I find that my perspective tends to only brings out anger with some people so I keep it to myself. I have found that no matter how much arguing I do with someone, I'm never going to change their religious views. People have to want to change their views themselves. I know this is going to lead nowhere. You, afdave, will not change your opinion. In fact, anyone posting on this forum will probably not change their opinion. We have done all the searching that we need to form our opinions, and drawn our conclusions. I think that here are those of us who wish to be told what to think and then there are those of us who wish to draw their own conclusions. Most people on here try to draw their own conclusions (even you afdave). Of those who wish to draw their own conclusions, some try to be objective and weigh all the evidence while some try to do that while also bringing in a belief system, which really isn't proven by any objective means (at this point in history). The latter method isn't good enough for me. |
| Date: 2006/04/20 07:25:28, Link 207.250.7.194 | ||
| Author: bourgeois_rage | ||
Looks like a third grader drew that.
Let me get this straight. The minority controls (I guess through radio waves) the majority's opinion? And if you voice an opinion that is not mainstream, then you are branded not mainstream? You're not mainstream. Oh by the way  -ds |
| Date: 2006/04/20 09:40:34, Link 207.250.7.194 | ||||
| Author: bourgeois_rage | ||||
|
Right you are, Flint. I've never been the best writer in the world, so sometimes my arguments can be somewhat disjointed. I guess my closing line was trying to be somewhat diplomatic.
ID does try to address some of the evidence, but due to their belief system they throw out whatever does not fit in. For instance Carbon dating and radioactive decay seems to be a problem for them. Instead of trying to fit their theory around those tools (which is what scientific theories do), they claim the tools are broken and throw them away. The same can be said of the Second Law of Thermodynamics. The sad/funny part is that for those who actually look into the claims, a lot of times the jumps in their logic/coverups are obvious. With ID proponents, they are actively trying to keep themselves in the dark or are being intentionally disingenuous.
That's probably about as concise as one can be. I endorse this answer to afdave's question. |
| Date: 2006/04/24 01:37:50, Link 207.250.7.194 |
| Author: bourgeois_rage |
|
If Dave's goal was to make Evilutionists looks stupid shouldn't he have left the answers that "didn't follow the directions" up? Then he could have pointed at them and showed how Darwin Ebola boys couldn't follow directions. Oh yeah, that would just help show what a moron that HE IS. DaveScot has to be the most dishonest person I think I've ever come across (on the internet or in real life). |
| Date: 2006/04/24 09:36:21, Link 207.250.7.194 |
| Author: bourgeois_rage |
| Why don't these guys just use some blogging software that doesn't hold comments in queues, or delay posting the information? |
| Date: 2006/04/25 04:36:04, Link 207.250.7.194 |
| Author: bourgeois_rage |
|
Subtle? "If you believe in my God, you'll get to meet Brad Pitt." I guess that's about as rational as "If you believe in my God you'll get to go to heaven, if you don't our loving God will send you to burn in the pit." If you haven't seen Ed's post, check it out. Brad Pitt is clearly made by an intelligent designer. Who else could have designed something that could make the switch between Jennifer Anniston and Angelina Jolie? Perfection! -ds |
| Date: 2006/04/25 07:51:10, Link 207.250.7.194 |
| Author: bourgeois_rage |
|
I don't know. Look, Friends was an IC system. Take the parts out and they don't work anymore. Good point, I believe that may be the Waterloo for the Darwinists -ds |
| Date: 2006/04/26 02:14:17, Link 207.250.7.194 | ||||
| Author: bourgeois_rage | ||||
I can see the bridge and observe the bridge's condition. If I wanted I could look up the previous inspection dates and engineering diagrams. And of course I can go and observe people crossing the bridge and make a judgment for myself on the safety of that bridge. I can also go out and stomp on the surface of the bridge to make sure that it is strong. Perhaps I could take smaples of the steel and concrete to analyse their strength. Show me something like that for God. Obviously we don't do this, but we could if we wanted. Because I drive over a bridge does not mean that I should worship your god. I think a more appropriate analogy would be driving off a cliff expecting to make it to the other side smoothly because the road map (Road Bible?) says that there is a bridge there, even though you cannot clearly see a bridge.
Stop right there. It is the best supported hypothesis around? Then you say that it is supported by faith. I actually think that is the opposite of support. You have faith because there is no support. |
| Date: 2006/04/27 07:27:11, Link 207.250.7.194 | ||
| Author: bourgeois_rage | ||
Yeah, we're all still waiting for that evidence. |
| Date: 2006/04/28 01:40:08, Link 207.250.7.194 |
| Author: bourgeois_rage |
|
dave: How can your hypothesis be falsified? |
| Date: 2006/04/28 05:37:04, Link 207.250.7.194 | ||
| Author: bourgeois_rage | ||
Haha, are they slipping? I can see the next reality show: "Who will be the Next ID PR Guy?" I hear that you can use your cell phone to vote now. |
| Date: 2006/05/01 06:05:22, Link 207.250.7.194 |
| Author: bourgeois_rage |
|
Faid: I nominate that for post of the year! |
| Date: 2006/05/01 08:19:28, Link 207.250.7.194 |
| Author: bourgeois_rage |
|
I've read it, and I have to say that it is a "page turner"; Every chapter ends on a cliffhanger. I wouldn't say that it is bad, but it's not anything really profound like some people would have you believe. The whole book is one big chase scene. Get it from the library, or borrow it from a friend. |
| Date: 2006/05/02 01:58:40, Link 207.250.7.194 | ||
| Author: bourgeois_rage | ||
I'd say a lot better. And his research is more indepth, I think. Focault's Pendulum was a very good book, in my opinion. |
| Date: 2006/05/02 02:03:59, Link 207.250.7.194 | ||
| Author: bourgeois_rage | ||
It was sabotage. If you look at the history you will see that the post script first showed up in an edit by a user named Disko on Feb 16th. |
| Date: 2006/05/03 10:03:32, Link 207.250.7.194 |
| Author: bourgeois_rage |
|
Heck if you had a time machine, maybe you could go and kidnap Hitler, and substitute him for Jesus. Then put Jesus, a jew, in charge of Nazi Germany. things would have been much better there. Of course everyone would be saying praise Hitler because he would have gotten all the credit or Jesus' work. And people will believe whatever they want to believe, so the Chrisitans will still think Jesus/Hitler was God and he died for our sins. It's a win-win situation. Oh and afdave, when are you going to present your evidence? Oh tomorrow? |
| Date: 2006/05/04 02:17:03, Link 207.250.7.194 |
| Author: bourgeois_rage |
|
Is this how science is done? Voting on what topics to delve into? 18 people? Is that arbitrary? Oh, ok. geocentrism.  |
| Date: 2006/05/04 06:11:01, Link 207.250.7.194 |
| Author: bourgeois_rage |
| Glen, clearly God made DNA so that brothers and sisters could not marry. |
| Date: 2006/05/04 06:11:01, Link 207.250.7.194 |
| Author: bourgeois_rage |
| Glen, clearly God made DNA so that brothers and sisters could not marry. |
| Date: 2006/05/05 02:18:42, Link 207.250.7.194 |
| Author: bourgeois_rage |
| Shouldn't the Earth revolve around Paley? Or better yet, Jesus (praise be his name)? |
| Date: 2006/05/16 02:37:17, Link 207.250.7.194 |
| Author: bourgeois_rage |
|
Slate is running a series now, where David Plotz, an ignoramus (his words), is reading the Bible and blogging his thoughts. His first installment is interesting. If you want to read it, click here. |
| Date: 2006/05/17 03:03:16, Link 207.250.7.194 | ||
| Author: bourgeois_rage | ||
|
| Date: 2006/05/18 04:50:56, Link 207.250.7.194 | ||
| Author: bourgeois_rage | ||
|
| Date: 2006/05/19 02:25:02, Link 207.250.7.194 |
| Author: bourgeois_rage |
| Thanks for pointing me at this. Great stuff. I've been a big fan of decentralized algorithms, and stuff like this just blows the mind. Scalability is a fine thing. |
| Date: 2006/05/22 09:03:13, Link 207.250.7.194 | ||
| Author: bourgeois_rage | ||
Wow, he sure fixed this up. I think he's removed all doubt that he is an intelligent person. He sure pulled a quick one over on us, and we're standing here looking like idiots. And this is from the only ID researcher ever!  Former Marine Sergeant David Springer says "You're outta here!! Google that!" -ds |
| Date: 2006/05/22 09:41:33, Link 207.250.7.194 | ||
| Author: bourgeois_rage | ||
Dave's a freakin' genius. The ACLU never takes any positions that are unpopular. Hey Dave, Google that! |
| Date: 2006/05/30 08:28:27, Link 207.250.7.194 | ||
| Author: bourgeois_rage | ||
NCSE transcripts page 39, line 9. This is where Behe says that Astrology is a scientific theory. Hope that's one that you wanted.
|
| Date: 2006/05/31 08:08:41, Link 207.250.7.194 | ||||
| Author: bourgeois_rage | ||||
Does that mean that there are "Arrogant Christians" (those who know Jesus loves them) and "Humble Christians" (those who don't know if Jesus loves them)? |
| Date: 2006/06/01 07:40:07, Link 207.250.7.194 | ||
| Author: bourgeois_rage | ||
I thought breathing showed that the second law of Thermodynamics was flawed. |
| Date: 2006/06/01 08:00:48, Link 207.250.7.194 | ||||
| Author: bourgeois_rage | ||||
But one has to breath in order to type sentences. |
| Date: 2006/06/01 10:22:08, Link 207.250.7.194 | ||||
| Author: bourgeois_rage | ||||
Ah, actually, that fits in with what DaveSLoT wants everyone to believe. Scientists say that SLot cannot be violated. If that is true, then Jesus must not exist. If Jesus does not exist, then Jesus must not love you. If all of the above is True, then scientists are trying to prove that Jesus doesn't love you. It all makes perfect sense. Sorry about derailing this thread. I'll try to get it back on topic.
|
| Date: 2006/06/02 02:38:29, Link 207.250.7.194 | ||||
| Author: bourgeois_rage | ||||
Gah, I hate it when I do that. Makes me feel dirty..., like an intelligent design advocate.
|
| Date: 2006/06/05 06:00:47, Link 207.250.7.194 |
| Author: bourgeois_rage |
|
As a computer engineer I have to agree with much of what is said above. Engineers tend to be confident and arrogant. I'm with Wayward Hammer in that I also took Philosophy in college, just three years ago, as well. My guess is that intelligent design is the product of engineers trying to reconcile their faith with their knowledge. The obvious connection is God's a designer and an engineer. This falls directly in line with their confidence and arrogance. They view themselves on similar terms as God and then the problem just doubles. It's a vicious cycle. |
| Date: 2006/06/07 03:14:49, Link 207.250.7.194 |
| Author: bourgeois_rage |
|
Gin. Nothin' beats gin. The upside to church is that you get wine there. |
| Date: 2006/06/09 02:23:47, Link 207.250.7.194 | ||
| Author: bourgeois_rage | ||
Ba doom ching! Clicky Click |
| Date: 2006/06/09 06:58:47, Link 207.250.7.194 | ||
| Author: bourgeois_rage | ||
Buh? If you can't post comments then comments can't be posted by you. You're outta here. -dt |
| Date: 2006/06/14 09:51:48, Link 207.250.7.194 | ||||
| Author: bourgeois_rage | ||||
Why was the animation even necessary? Couldn't they have just typed the text? Think in way that you have never thought before? Think I'll stick with the ways I'm thinking now. If I started thinking like Mike Gene, every post on here would have to be a separate flash animation. |
| Date: 2006/06/16 05:53:53, Link 207.250.7.194 |
| Author: bourgeois_rage |
| Congrats! As someone who only has a lowly BS, I'm in awe. |
| Date: 2006/06/17 03:18:01, Link 65.29.223.114 |
| Author: bourgeois_rage |
 |
| Date: 2006/06/19 02:54:48, Link 207.250.7.194 | ||
| Author: bourgeois_rage | ||
Thank you. The designer is my co-pilot, but Otto is my autopilot. |
| Date: 2006/06/19 09:54:33, Link 207.250.7.194 | ||
| Author: bourgeois_rage | ||
You must have missed this one. See. It appears that we may start having to "teach the controversy" of whether Arc researchers are idiots, liers, or both.
|
| Date: 2006/06/20 09:31:45, Link 207.250.7.194 | ||
| Author: bourgeois_rage | ||
I've seen this elsewhere, as well. There must be some creationist propaganda somewhere that is saying that even organisms being tested on believe in Jesus and are fighting "the good fight" against RM + NS. |
| Date: 2006/06/21 04:14:53, Link 207.250.7.194 | ||
| Author: bourgeois_rage | ||
So in order to avoid computers, politics and religion he has become a poster on UD? |
| Date: 2006/06/22 08:10:29, Link 207.250.7.194 | ||
| Author: bourgeois_rage | ||
In response to the Record viewings thread. High level debate? Where? |
| Date: 2006/06/22 08:28:51, Link 207.250.7.194 | ||
| Author: bourgeois_rage | ||
No comment needed. |
| Date: 2006/06/23 09:10:14, Link 207.250.7.194 |
| Author: bourgeois_rage |
| Good Lord! I have avoided this thread for the last month or so, and coming back I see that afdave is still going and going... He must be trying to overcome the Uncommonly Dense thread. |
| Date: 2006/06/26 04:54:27, Link 207.250.7.194 | ||
| Author: bourgeois_rage | ||
Ed Brayton has a link to an article in a student paper that has this lovely gem to say about UD:
With advocates like these... You'll need an advocate, but I won't listen to them. Your kind isn't welcome here, I'm sick of responding to your drivel. -dt |
| Date: 2006/06/28 04:52:05, Link 207.250.7.194 |
| Author: bourgeois_rage |
|
I think they've realized that some of their "readers" didn't like all the long blocks of text. Getting their ideas across in the form of cartoons seems like the best method of communication for them. The one thing that is the most (unintentionally) humorous about it is that the message has not changed at all. It's still just making fun of science, as if that proves their argument. |
| Date: 2006/06/29 10:00:19, Link 207.250.7.194 | ||||
| Author: bourgeois_rage | ||||
There is no way that you randomly guessed that Mr. Rhoda was going to say that, it's far too improbable! Anyone who thinks that you just guessed that he was going to say something like that is only lying to themselves. Clearly you were prompted by God to say what you said. Hear, hear! -dt |
| Date: 2006/06/30 01:58:27, Link 207.250.7.194 | ||
| Author: bourgeois_rage | ||
Wow, check out where her hand is in that picture. |
| Date: 2006/07/03 09:32:30, Link 207.250.7.194 | ||
| Author: bourgeois_rage | ||
This thread is great on her blog. Do you think Dave will ever make that "first post"? Maybe he was too busy on the weekend trying to figure out when jury duty is.
|
| Date: 2006/07/03 09:59:56, Link 207.250.7.194 |
| Author: bourgeois_rage |
| Yeah she seems like someone who is open minded. If she really wants to see this fight played out on the scientific field, great! If she wants to stick to the ground rules she has set, she could be finding that she's more inclined to accept the side that she seems to have prematurely ruled-out. That's why I want to see Dave make that first (in more than one sense) positive argument for ID. |
| Date: 2006/07/07 02:59:11, Link 207.250.7.194 |
| Author: bourgeois_rage |
| She's good. She's really pushing the envelope of banter with DaveScot. |
| Date: 2006/07/07 05:36:14, Link 207.250.7.194 | ||
| Author: bourgeois_rage | ||
Odd, maybe, but not out of the realm of possibility. I used to watch a lot of old TV shows when I was a kid. Also, it is not that obscure of a reference. |
| Date: 2006/07/07 09:42:38, Link 207.250.7.194 | ||
| Author: bourgeois_rage | ||
Brilliant. Good thing these people aren't trying to force feed their view of science into the education system. I think the theory that avocationist is looking for is "intelligent molecule holding." It says that some intelligent being is required to hold all the molcules together, or else they will all fly apart. Oh and molecules that fly apart, they are governed by "intelligent molecule pushing." That says the molecules need an intelligent force to push them apart, otherwise they would just stick together. Click |
| Date: 2006/07/11 03:54:51, Link 207.250.7.194 | ||||
| Author: bourgeois_rage | ||||
But again, it's not about religion. Blinders! Ha! |
| Date: 2006/07/12 03:47:18, Link 207.250.7.194 | ||
| Author: bourgeois_rage | ||
|
Dave posts again on JanieBelle's blog. http://udoj.blogspot.com/2006/07/wow-how-appropriate-is-this-post.html And to do some quote mining of my own, he had this to say:
|
| Date: 2006/07/13 05:15:10, Link 207.250.7.194 | ||||
| Author: bourgeois_rage | ||||
We need to make it so that no one can question ID; We need to make it religion. Ah, but it is... |
| Date: 2006/07/18 05:10:38, Link 207.250.7.194 |
| Author: bourgeois_rage |
| Comments are closed? Everyone prepare for a slow couple of days... Hopefully the tard will build up like water behind a dam and come rushing forth when comments are opened up again. |
| Date: 2006/07/18 05:27:31, Link 207.250.7.194 |
| Author: bourgeois_rage |
| Janie responds to her banning. |
| Date: 2006/07/18 07:49:09, Link 207.250.7.194 |
| Author: bourgeois_rage |
| Dave, don't come back until you can post something novel. -wad |
| Date: 2006/07/19 10:11:38, Link 207.250.7.194 | ||
| Author: bourgeois_rage | ||
If JanieBelle really isn't a real person, I have to say that not only has she pulled off a great hoax, but the patience she has shown is astounding. I think the news about the family would be easy to fake, and obviously the lesbian love scenes would be fun to write. But quoteing Shakespeare with Blipey seems to show a bit of research for someone just playing a 17 year old girl. On top of that, sitting through my attempts at describing some evidence for evolution would require some real restraint from someone who knows all about it. Looking at her comments on UD also look like a real person, not someone acting. Had I been acting, the jig would have been up long ago. If she's not real close to who she says that she is, then I'll be the first to admit that I've been had. Edit: Maybe I need to be more skeptical... |
| Date: 2006/07/20 08:48:44, Link 207.250.7.194 | ||
| Author: bourgeois_rage | ||
|
Anyone want to take bets on how long it will take for someone to get banned while staying within the rules posted? Closest without going over. From the time that comments are re-opened I give it 58 hours.
|
| Date: 2006/07/24 03:06:05, Link 207.250.7.194 | ||||
| Author: bourgeois_rage | ||||
I posted this contest. The rules were:
click So Thanks for playing. Maybe if you posted a couple of more times at UD you could have been victorious. |
| Date: 2006/07/24 04:04:35, Link 207.250.7.194 |
| Author: bourgeois_rage |
|
I am an idiot.... Steve you won... I can't understand my own rules. I'll try to find a prize worthy of such idiocy. |
| Date: 2006/07/26 02:55:17, Link 207.250.7.194 | ||
| Author: bourgeois_rage | ||
Steve: How about an Otto Award for Political Theatre.  Yeah, that's quite appropriate. |
| Date: 2006/08/01 08:05:21, Link 207.250.7.194 | ||
| Author: bourgeois_rage | ||
|
| Date: 2006/08/02 01:58:49, Link 207.250.7.194 | ||
| Author: bourgeois_rage | ||
The first friend, "Tom" is the guy who runs mySpace. Everybody gets him as a friend. The other friend appears to be either an advert for a movie or one of the actors in that movie. A movie not about ID, I might add. |
| Date: 2006/08/03 10:54:20, Link 207.250.7.194 | ||
| Author: bourgeois_rage | ||
|
DaveScot leaves some more information as to his identity. Stop me if you guys already know this.
UDoJ Link |
| Date: 2006/08/08 04:36:10, Link 207.250.7.194 |
| Author: bourgeois_rage |
| Jerry! Jerry! Jerry! |
| Date: 2006/08/10 03:28:06, Link 65.29.207.180 | ||||||||
| Author: bourgeois_rage | ||||||||
If there was anything in that thread, Buud didn't seem to catch it. It just shows up there as a blank post. Just a repost so that others can find it easily: Buud |
| Date: 2006/08/17 09:15:11, Link 207.250.7.194 | ||
| Author: bourgeois_rage | ||
|
Blipey's got a great rant at DaveScot over on UDoJ. Check it out if you can.
Bravo, Blipey, Bravo. |
| Date: 2006/08/18 02:08:31, Link 207.250.7.194 |
| Author: bourgeois_rage |
| Louis, is that from a movie or something? It is brilliant! We used to sing rugby songs back in college. |
| Date: 2006/08/21 02:49:29, Link 207.250.7.194 | ||
| Author: bourgeois_rage | ||
|
A few days old, but a great quote from Joel: Click
I think alien abduction is silly, but the fact that Darwinist ignore it proves that they are following their dying religion. Sounds like another waterloo is coming. And this time with lazers and cattle mutilations. |
| Date: 2006/08/23 02:16:12, Link 207.250.7.194 | ||||
| Author: bourgeois_rage | ||||
Don't forget those who only thank Jesus for helping them turn their computer on. They get booted all the time, too. |
| Date: 2006/08/31 03:01:10, Link 207.250.7.194 | ||
| Author: bourgeois_rage | ||
Again in the Mount Rushmore Thread:
Thanks for clearing that up Dave. What's the chance of Mount Rushmore being natural? I don't know, but it must be so small that it is not worth calculating. Of course the Aliens would use CSI to figure it out, but we'd be idiots to even try. Has anyone ever seen anybody give the CSI for anything? I've never looked at Dumbski's books, does he even calculate the CSI for anything? Who else wants to see a double blind for CSI's effectiveness? Double Blinds are for materialists, that's over the top. You're outta here. -dt |
| Date: 2006/09/11 05:49:45, Link 207.250.7.194 |
| Author: bourgeois_rage |
|
Got me good at the get go. Once Steve started to question the blog, I started getting suspicious, but it was played well. I was willing to give the benefit of the doubt. Nice job, overall, Lou. |
| Date: 2006/09/14 09:22:51, Link 207.250.7.194 | ||||
| Author: bourgeois_rage | ||||
Speaking of Harry Potter, I just saw this in a thread where a Christian was trying to explain why he won't let the book in his house.
|
| Date: 2006/09/15 04:46:45, Link 207.250.7.194 | ||
| Author: bourgeois_rage | ||
Yeah, crazy. These kids are so dumb, why try to confuse them with things like, "Jesus is Lord!" and "Goddidit?" |
| Date: 2006/09/20 03:04:38, Link 207.250.7.194 | ||||||
| Author: bourgeois_rage | ||||||
Bwhahahh! Google is now "in on the conspiracy." Karl's replies are obvious (at least, I was going to post them if he hadn't beaten me to it):
|
| Date: 2006/09/20 03:25:46, Link 207.250.7.194 |
| Author: bourgeois_rage |
|
In all likelyhood, they didn't shut out google. Here's their robots.txt: http://www.uncommondescent.com/robots.txt What probably happened was google tired to hit UD and for whatever reason the site did not respond, so it de-indexed them. http://www.searchenginepromotionhelp.com/m....ker.php says that they have an error, but I'm not sure if it enough to stop the googlebot. The idea that DaveScot immediately jumps to the conclusion that someone at google hacked the search engine from the inside is a good commentary on the thinking that goes on over there. Why Google may ban you |
| Date: 2006/09/27 03:28:39, Link 207.250.7.194 | ||
| Author: bourgeois_rage | ||
The have overwhelming forums! |
| Date: 2006/09/29 09:58:14, Link 207.250.7.194 |
| Author: bourgeois_rage |
|
Same here, SS. I have heard the cat/dog thing, but with other animals. Yeah, creationism is a bigger threat than a lot of other idiot theories because it is a larger threat (getting into schools) and because it is fairly widespread. I have argued with people who I know to be perfectly rational being about a variety of these issues and by far, the creationists are the most stubborn. At least with most astrology buffs and moon landing hoaxers, you can get them to admit that it is either just for fun, or they can admit that the possibility exists that they are wrong. Creationists just eventually fall back on, "I ain't no monkey!" How can you argue with that? |
| Date: 2006/10/05 07:10:09, Link 207.250.7.194 |
| Author: bourgeois_rage |
| YouTube is awesome! |
| Date: 2006/10/11 02:12:59, Link 207.250.7.194 |
| Author: bourgeois_rage |
|
TRoutMac? This is what I though of:  I guess that means that this is a team of crack ID researchers:  |
| Date: 2006/10/12 02:19:14, Link 207.250.7.194 | ||
| Author: bourgeois_rage | ||
Link |
| Date: 2006/10/12 06:04:43, Link 207.250.7.194 | ||
| Author: bourgeois_rage | ||
Would that really be a costume? |
| Date: 2006/10/25 03:42:45, Link 207.250.7.194 | ||
| Author: bourgeois_rage | ||
Not all of us computer engineers are this dense. |
| Date: 2006/11/02 02:53:46, Link 207.250.7.194 | ||
| Author: bourgeois_rage | ||
Bring Janie and Kate, Lou. |
| Date: 2006/11/03 02:30:51, Link 207.250.7.194 | ||||||
| Author: bourgeois_rage | ||||||
|
http://www.uncommondescent.com/archives/1758 College ID book now, eh? Lets see what kind of brilliant stuff will be taught at the college level.
So if design is by definition only brought about by intelligence, why do they need to specify intelligent design?
Yeah get as many versions as you guys can out there, so that when the next trial comes around we can again show how some words were changed to mask the fact that your new "theory" is just ID in a cheap tuxedo, which is just Creation Science in a cheap tuxedo. Note: Putting more tuxedos on does not make you look any better.
What!? I didn't come from no |
| Date: 2006/11/03 08:49:05, Link 207.250.7.194 | ||
| Author: bourgeois_rage | ||
|
Looks like Sal's in the clear... http://www.uncommondescent.com/archives/1760
|
| Date: 2006/11/07 08:35:01, Link 207.250.7.194 | ||||||||
| Author: bourgeois_rage | ||||||||
I don't think that means that they had to have legs, maybe they used to be able to fly. Here's some snakes that have gotten around the whole crawling on your belly thing. Weeee! My thought is that cows form chrysalids and then after a short time they open revealing a few hundred snakes. Wow, freaky, That needs to be made into a movie. |
| Date: 2006/11/08 13:31:24, Link 207.250.7.194 |
| Author: bourgeois_rage |
| I got to cast my vote for Schloemer. It felt good. |
| Date: 2006/11/08 14:04:46, Link 207.250.7.194 |
| Author: bourgeois_rage |
|
Lou, I was just reading through old posts on UDoJ, and I came across this gem where DaveScotDell needs help uploading his avatar. Humorously, he's still using that avatar to this day. In a way he still is carrying around a mark of his idiocy. On another note, it is quite weird to read the stuff we wrote under the assumption that you were a 17 year old female. Too funny. |
| Date: 2006/11/10 08:46:31, Link 207.250.7.194 |
| Author: bourgeois_rage |
This is the first picture that comes up on Google Image search for DaveScot:  "Only thing that comes from Texas are steers and queers! You're outta here homo!" -dt |
| Date: 2006/11/22 09:29:52, Link 207.250.7.194 | ||
| Author: bourgeois_rage | ||
Good one Dave. But I'm confused. I thought marines were tough. I guess that also shows that Dembski isn't smart. |
| Date: 2006/12/15 08:09:30, Link 207.250.7.194 |
| Author: bourgeois_rage |
| 300 pages? Nope, but getting close... |
| Date: 2006/12/21 10:38:15, Link 207.250.7.194 | ||
| Author: bourgeois_rage | ||
Fizzling? What are you talking about? That graph clearly shows that Intelligent Design is infinitely more popular now than at the beginning of 2004. That sound you hear is Darwinism's Waterloo. |
| Date: 2006/12/22 10:40:55, Link 207.250.7.194 |
| Author: bourgeois_rage |
| Born in Toledo, OH and now I live in Cincinnati, OH. How boring! |
| Date: 2007/01/05 09:23:38, Link 207.250.7.194 |
| Author: bourgeois_rage |
| As to Robo being a physics student, hold out hope. Engineering students are often also required to take general physics classes. |
| Date: 2007/01/26 13:10:55, Link 207.250.7.194 | ||
| Author: bourgeois_rage | ||
Whoa, I've been gone a while. I didn't realize a picture of Dave had been revealed. Yikes. |
| Date: 2008/03/26 10:18:44, Link 207.250.7.194 |
| Author: bourgeois_rage |
| I've been away far too long. These shops are brilliant. |
| Date: 2008/03/26 12:46:46, Link 207.250.7.194 | ||
| Author: bourgeois_rage | ||
No, that's not sarcasm. :D |
| Date: 2008/11/17 13:45:08, Link 207.250.7.194 |
| Author: bourgeois_rage |
| What a sad day, this is. What will we do without DaveSLoT? |
=====
5 pm
… how different are the DNA between man and woman? Could it be factually argued that the difference is greater between man and woman, than it is between man and chimp?