AE BB DB Explorer


Action:
Author:
Search Terms (separate with commas, no spaces):


form_srcid: Thrinaxodon

form_srcid: Thrinaxodon

form_cmd: view_author

Your IP address is 54.80.132.10

View Author detected.

view author posts with search matches:

Retrieve source record and display it.

form_author:

form_srcid: Thrinaxodon

q: SELECT AUTHOR, MEMBER_NAME, IP_ADDR, POST_DATE, TOPIC_ID, t1.FORUM_ID, POST, POST_ID, FORUM_VIEW_THREADS from ib_forum_posts AS t1 LEFT JOIN (ib_member_profiles AS t2, ib_forum_info AS t3) ON (t1.forum_id = t3.forum_id AND t1.author = t2.member_id) WHERE MEMBER_NAME like 'Thrinaxodon%' and forum_view_threads LIKE '*' ORDER BY POST_DATE ASC

DB_err:

DB_result: Resource id #6

Date: 2013/06/05 02:31:24, Link
Author: Thrinaxodon
TSZ is a place for cowards to beat up open-minded, intelligent people.

Date: 2013/06/05 02:31:49, Link
Author: Thrinaxodon
TSZ is a place for cowards to beat up open-minded, intelligent people.

Date: 2013/06/05 02:34:18, Link
Author: Thrinaxodon
[Graffiti moved to Bathroom Wall. - Lou FCD]

Scientific resources, that show Velikovskianism is true:

1. http://www.varchive.org/....ive.org

2. http://velikovsky.de/....vsky.de

3. http://www.velikovsky.info/....ky.info

4. http://www.velikovsky.org/....sky.org

Date: 2013/06/05 03:30:52, Link
Author: Thrinaxodon
Quote (damitall @ June 05 2013,03:23)
Quote (Thrinaxodon @ June 05 2013,02:31)
TSZ is a place for cowards to beat up open-minded, intelligent people.

Possibly, but the cowards mostly dare not venture outside of the pit at UD, so the open-minded, intelligent folk at TSZ are short of targets.

No, the cowards are at TSZ.

Date: 2013/06/05 05:02:54, Link
Author: Thrinaxodon
[Graffiti moved to Bathroom Wall. - Lou FCD]

Quote (Thrinaxodon @ June 05 2013,02:34)
Scientific resources, that show Velikovskianism is true:

1. http://www.varchive.org/....ive....ive.org

2. http://velikovsky.de/....vsk....vsky.de

3. http://www.velikovsky.info/....ky.....ky.info

4. http://www.velikovsky.org/....sky....sky.org

There's also the Aeon Journal, which continues what Velikovsky put down.

Date: 2013/06/05 05:34:09, Link
Author: Thrinaxodon
Quote (Ptaylor @ June 05 2013,05:30)
Quote (Thrinaxodon @ June 05 2013,19:31)
TSZ is a place for cowards to beat up open-minded, intelligent people.

So why not just go to TSZ and air your grievances there? Tip: you may have people there asking questions you find difficult to answer; that is not getting 'beaten up'.

Because; it smells like rotting eggs.

Date: 2013/06/05 07:59:06, Link
Author: Thrinaxodon
[Graffiti moved to Bathroom Wall. - Lou FCD]

A study that ultimately confirms Velikovskianism, again.

http://aeonjournal.com/article....rn.html

Date: 2013/06/05 09:58:48, Link
Author: Thrinaxodon
Obama has just ordered TSZ to be shutdown, for being an Internet hate site.

Date: 2013/06/05 10:04:43, Link
Author: Thrinaxodon
[Graffiti moved to Bathroom Wall. - Lou FCD]

Quote (OgreMkV @ June 05 2013,08:16)
Quote (Thrinaxodon @ June 05 2013,02:34)
Scientific resources, that show Velikovskianism is true:

1. http://www.varchive.org/....ive....ive.org

2. http://velikovsky.de/....vsk....vsky.de

3. http://www.velikovsky.info/....ky.....ky.info

4. http://www.velikovsky.org/....sky....sky.org

Three of your sources that Velikovskianism (whatever the hell that is) is true are from Velikovsky.

Well, I guess that's that then.  Why is Velikovskianism true, because Velikovsky says so.  That's a hard argument to refute.

Now, what the hell are you talking about?  

Oh and BTW: This thread is for science news... please continue this discussion on whatever this is in the bathroom wall thread.

Thanks

Immanuel Velikovsky is the greatest scientist of all time. He discovered that the OT did happen, but through, "Worlds in Collision".

Date: 2013/06/05 10:53:46, Link
Author: Thrinaxodon
It's called, "Deception by Omission".

Date: 2013/06/05 11:00:58, Link
Author: Thrinaxodon
Quote (Febble @ June 05 2013,10:56)
Quote (Thrinaxodon @ June 05 2013,10:53)
It's called, "Deception by Omission".

I'm still not sure what you mean by "cowardly".  Do you mean that I (or the people who post there) are hiding something they are frightened to show?

Your cowardly by not letting the people from the other side post.

Date: 2013/06/05 11:07:00, Link
Author: Thrinaxodon
[Graffiti moved to Bathroom Wall. - Lou FCD]

Quote (OgreMkV @ June 05 2013,10:18)
Quote (Thrinaxodon @ June 05 2013,10:04)
 
Quote (OgreMkV @ June 05 2013,08:16)
 
Quote (Thrinaxodon @ June 05 2013,02:34)
Scientific resources, that show Velikovskianism is true:

1. http://www.varchive.org/....ive....ive.org

2. http://velikovsky.de/....vsk....vsky.de

3. http://www.velikovsky.info/....ky.....ky.info

4. http://www.velikovsky.org/....sky....sky.org

Three of your sources that Velikovskianism (whatever the hell that is) is true are from Velikovsky.

Well, I guess that's that then.  Why is Velikovskianism true, because Velikovsky says so.  That's a hard argument to refute.

Now, what the hell are you talking about?  

Oh and BTW: This thread is for science news... please continue this discussion on whatever this is in the bathroom wall thread.

Thanks

Immanuel Velikovsky is the greatest scientist of all time. He discovered that the OT did happen, but through, "Worlds in Collision".

Peer review?

eta: Oh, this is the guy who redefined orbital mechanics to support the Old Testament.

Kind of like how Behe redefined science so that ID would be included.

Got it.  Thanks.  I think further discussion should be on the bathroom wall thread.

Velikovsky was a great scientist. Obama actually appointed him to be the scientific adviser.

Date: 2013/06/05 11:51:22, Link
Author: Thrinaxodon
Quote (eigenstate @ June 05 2013,11:30)
Quote (Thrinaxodon @ June 05 2013,11:00)
 
Quote (Febble @ June 05 2013,10:56)
   
Quote (Thrinaxodon @ June 05 2013,10:53)
It's called, "Deception by Omission".

I'm still not sure what you mean by "cowardly".  Do you mean that I (or the people who post there) are hiding something they are frightened to show?

Your cowardly by not letting the people from the other side post.

If any cowardice exists, it's to be found in the ID advocates and admins at Uncommon Descent. ID apologists at UD are both heavily committed to real ideological censorship -- not moderation to control hate speech, spam, verbal abuse, etc, but banning users and deleting content because it is *ideologically* offensive -- and also conspicuously unwilling to venture outside the safe confines of UD where the admins will tolerate their abuses, and protect them from any persistent ideological challenge.

At TSZ, the problem is the reverse. It's difficult to find IDers who are willing to venture out of UD and engage in an open conversation, to participate in a two-way exchange. William J. Murray and a couple of other sporadic posters (Blas?) show that it can be done, and all the better for the discussion at TSZ, but the real take-away from TSZ is that UD's denizens are a group that is only able/comfortable in a setting where they are protected from critique and challenge. TSZ would flourish all the more if the UD crowd had the fortitude to actually engage their critics.

Similarly, UD would flourish in the "it's interesting and educational" sense if it could find the courage to tolerate critics in its discussions. It would be a PR and political disaster for ID, as ID can't hold it's own in a fair fight between ideas. But it would be an interesting spectacle, and has been at times when UD had brief lapses in censorial and bullying responses.

Just look at the "doors". At TSZ, the door is wide open and the welcome mat is out. Even if you get way off topic, or personally nasty, even then you don't get banned, or your posts disappeared; you get those posts quarantined, moved to the side, but still available (which is wise, because it stops short of censorship, and leaves the "incriminating posts" available to be judged by the fair reader).

At UD, as soon as you become a bit difficult to deal with ideologically, you are banned. UD keeps a small cadre of "token" critics around, for appearance's sake, but these are few in number and tolerated because their criticism can be kept to manageable margins. If UD were to open up to all interested parties, they would be overrun with critics, many of them exceedingly polite and civil, but devastating in their critiques of ID and defenses of science against ID's attacks against it.

I'm not sure where you got the impression you did -- perhaps you are only familiar with TSZ and not familiar with Uncommon Descent -- but you have the facts backward. TSZ is as open and tolerant a forum as you are likely to find on the net.

No. This website, doesn't delete any content (other than spam).
http://members3.boardhost.com/john412....john412

Date: 2013/06/05 13:52:01, Link
Author: Thrinaxodon
[Graffiti moved to Bathroom Wall. - Lou FCD]

He secretly survived.

Date: 2013/06/05 20:13:05, Link
Author: Thrinaxodon
[Graffiti moved to Bathroom Wall. - Lou FCD]

Quote (Richardthughes @ June 05 2013,13:56)
Quote (Thrinaxodon @ June 05 2013,13:52)
He secretly survived.

Put some effort in at least.

THIS ISSUE RECENTLY APPEARED IN THE NEW ISSUE OF "Aeon Journal". THIS
POST WILL FEATURE AN EXCERPT, WHICH PRAISES VELIKOVSKY'S WORK.

I have read less than a handful of books that can be said to have
influenced my way of thinking. Immanuel Velikovsky's Worlds in
Collision has not only been one of them, in the end it totally changed
my life.
In this work Velikovsky proposed that, in the distant past, but still
within man's memory, the planet Jupiter ejected from itself a smaller
but sizeable body that careened across the solar system in the form of
a giant comet. Coming into close contact with Earth, but avoiding an
actual collision, this cometary body caused a series of catastrophic
events which mankind remembered and passed on to his descendants in an
oral and written tradition that eventually evolved into the well-known
mythologies of the various nations. Thus the gods and goddesses of
antiquity seem to have really been the deified planets of the solar
system. Their divine actions were merely reflections of errant orbits
in a cosmic drama which man witnessed and immortalized in his
religious rites, his liturgies and, finally, his sacred texts.

THIS IS REAL SCIENCE. THE THUGS AT sci.bio.paleontology, sci.skeptic,
alt.atheism, and talk.origins WILL HAVE TO SEE THIS.
===========================
"False words are not only evil in themselves, but they infect the
soul
with evil." - Socrates
"To the divine providence it has seemed good to prepare in the world
to come for the righteous good things, which the unrighteous shall
not
enjoy; and for the wicked evil things, by which the good shall not be
tormented. But as for the good things of this life, and its ills, God
has willed that these should be common to both; that we might not too
eagerly covet the things which wicked men are seen equally to enjoy,
nor shrink with an unseemly fear from the ills which even good men
often suffer.
There is, too, a very great difference in the purpose served both by
those events which we call adverse and those called prosperous. For
the good man is neither uplifted with the good things of time, nor
broken by its ills; but the wicked man, because he is corrupted by
this world’s happiness, feels himself punished by its unhappiness." -
St. Augustine of Hippo
"I have loved righteousness and hated iniquity, and therefore I die
in
exile." - St. Gregory VII, His Last Words.
===========================
THRINAXODON UPDATED HIS PROFILE PICTURE.
http://thrinaxodon.wordpress.com/2013....ile-...
===================================
THRINAXODON IS NOW ON TWITTER.

Date: 2013/06/06 08:08:49, Link
Author: Thrinaxodon
[Graffiti moved to Bathroom Wall. - Lou FCD]

Quote (OgreMkV @ June 05 2013,11:21)
Quote (Thrinaxodon @ June 05 2013,11:07)
 
Quote (OgreMkV @ June 05 2013,10:18)
 
Quote (Thrinaxodon @ June 05 2013,10:04)
   
Quote (OgreMkV @ June 05 2013,08:16)
     
Quote (Thrinaxodon @ June 05 2013,02:34)
Scientific resources, that show Velikovskianism is true:

1. http://www.varchive.org/....ive....ive.org

2. http://velikovsky.de/....vsk....vsky.de

3. http://www.velikovsky.info/....ky.....ky.info

4. http://www.velikovsky.org/....sky....sky.org

Three of your sources that Velikovskianism (whatever the hell that is) is true are from Velikovsky.

Well, I guess that's that then.  Why is Velikovskianism true, because Velikovsky says so.  That's a hard argument to refute.

Now, what the hell are you talking about?  

Oh and BTW: This thread is for science news... please continue this discussion on whatever this is in the bathroom wall thread.

Thanks

Immanuel Velikovsky is the greatest scientist of all time. He discovered that the OT did happen, but through, "Worlds in Collision".

Peer review?

eta: Oh, this is the guy who redefined orbital mechanics to support the Old Testament.

Kind of like how Behe redefined science so that ID would be included.

Got it.  Thanks.  I think further discussion should be on the bathroom wall thread.

Velikovsky was a great scientist. Obama actually appointed him to be the scientific adviser.

He very well may be a 'great scientist'.

That doesn't mean he is correct about everything he says.

Again, I'm asking you to move this discussion to the BW.

Thanks

eta: Just out of curiosity, how did Obama appoint him to be a scientific advisor since he died in 1979?

Have you ever read, "Aeon Journal?"

Date: 2013/06/06 09:43:16, Link
Author: Thrinaxodon
Quote (OgreMkV @ June 06 2013,09:03)
No.  I haven't.  There are a million journals that actually publish science with a proper peer-review.  I don't have time for all of them, much less journals that don't have a peer-review process, that is edited by one guy with (seemingly) no credentials in mythology or physics.

Do you have specific evidence that shows how all of modern physics is wrong?

The evidence is in the journal.

Date: 2013/06/06 10:43:11, Link
Author: Thrinaxodon
Quote (OgreMkV @ June 06 2013,09:57)
Quote (Thrinaxodon @ June 06 2013,09:43)
Quote (OgreMkV @ June 06 2013,09:03)
No.  I haven't.  There are a million journals that actually publish science with a proper peer-review.  I don't have time for all of them, much less journals that don't have a peer-review process, that is edited by one guy with (seemingly) no credentials in mythology or physics.

Do you have specific evidence that shows how all of modern physics is wrong?

The evidence is in the journal.

So you can't point or copy/paste any evidence that shows that orbital mechanics is wrong.

Fair enough.  Thanks for playing.

Here's the evidence:

COSMOS WITHOUT GRAVITATION:  

THE FUNDAMENTAL theory of this paper is: Gravitation is an electromagnetic phenomenon. There is no primary motion inherent in planets and satellites. Electric attraction, repulsion, and electromagnetic circumduction(1)govern their movements. The moon does not “fall,” attracted to the earth from an assumed inertial motion along a straight line, nor is the phenomenon of objects falling in the terrestrial atmosphere comparable with the “falling effect” in the movement of the moon, a conjecture which is the basic element of the Newtonian theory of gravitation.

Aside from several important facts discovered in the study of cosmic upheavals, which are not illuminated here and only enumerated at the end of this paper, and which are discussed at length in a work of research entitled Worlds In Collisionnow being prepared for publication, the following facts are incompatible with the theory of gravitation:




   
   The ingredients of the air—oxygen, nitrogen, argon and other gases—though not in a compound but in a mixture, are found in equal proportions at various levels of the atmosphere despite great differences in specific weights. The explanation accepted in science is this: “Swift winds keep the gases thoroughly mixed, so that except for water-vapor the composition of the atmosphere is the same throughout the troposphere to a high degree of approximation.” (2) This explanation cannot be true. If it were true, then the moment the wind subsides, the nitrogen should stream upward, and the oxygen should drop, preceded by the argon. If winds are caused by a difference in weight between warm and cold air, the difference in weight between heavy gases high in the atmosphere and light gases at the lower levels should create storms, which would subside only after they had carried each gas to its natural place in accordance with its gravity or specific weight. But nothing of the kind happens.

   

   When some aviators expressed the belief that “pockets of noxious gas” are in the air, the scientists replied:

   “There are no ‘pockets of noxious gas.’ No single gas, and no other likely mixture of gases, has, at ordinary temperatures and pressures, the same density as atmospheric air. Therefore, a pocket of foreign gas in that atmosphere would almost certainly either bob up like a balloon, or sink like a stone in water.” (3)

   Why, then, do not the atmospheric gases separate and stay apart in accordance with the specific gravities?

   

   
   Ozone, though heavier than oxygen, is absent in the lower layers of the atmosphere, is present in the upper layers, and is not subject to the “mixing effect of the wind.” The presence of ozone high in the atmosphere suggests that oxygen must be still higher: “As oxygen is less dense than ozone, it will tend to rise to even greater heights.” (4) Nowhere is it asked why ozone does not descend of its own weight or at least why it is not mixed by the wind with other gases.

   

   

   
   Water, though eight hundred times heavier than air, is held in droplets, by the millions of tons, miles above the ground. Clouds and mist are composed of droplets which defy gravitation.

   

   

   
   Even if perfect elasticity is a quality of the molecules of all gases, the motion of the molecules, if effected by a mechanical cause, must subside because of the gravitational attraction between the particles and also because of the gravitational pull of the earth. There should also be a loss of momentum as the result of the transformation of a part of the energy of motion into vibration of molecules hit in the collisions.(5) But since the molecules of a gas at a constant temperature (or in a perfect insulator) do not stop moving, it is obvious that a force generated in collisions drives them. The molecules of gases try to escape one another. Repulsion between the particles of gases and vapors counteracts the attraction.

   

   

   
   The weight of the atmosphere is constantly changing as the changing barometric pressure indicates. Low pressure areas are not necessarily encircled by high pressure belts. The semidiurnal changes in barometric pressure are not explainable by the mechanistic principles of gravitation and the heat effect of solar radiation. The cause of these variations is unknown.

   “It has been known now for two and a half centuries, that there are more or less daily variations in the height of the barometer, culminating in two maxima and two minima during the course of 24 hours. Since Dr. Beal’s discovery (1664-65), the same observation has been made and puzzled over at every station at which pressure records were kept and studied, but without success in finding for it the complete physical explanation. In speaking of the diurnal and semidiurnal variations of the barometer, Lord Rayleigh says: ‘The relative magnitude of the latter [semidiurnal variations], as observed at most parts of the earth’s surface, is still a mystery, all the attempted explanations being illusory.’” (6)

   One maximum is at 10 a.m., the other at 10 p.m.; the two minima are at 4 a.m. and 4 p.m. The heating effect of the sun can explain neither the time when the maxima appear nor the time of the minima of these semidiurnal variations. If the pressure becomes lower without the air becoming lighter through a lateral expansion due to heat, this must mean that the same mass of air gravitates with changing force at different hours.

   The lowest pressure is near the equator, in the belt of the doldrums. Yet the troposphere is highest at the equator, being on the average about 18 km. high there; it is lower in the moderate latitudes, and only 6 km. high above the ground at the poles.

   

   
   Laplace, pondering the shape of the atmospheric envelope of the earth, came to the conclusion that the atmosphere, which rotates with the same angular velocity as the earth and which behaves like a fluid, must be lenticular in form; its polar and equatorial axes must be about 35,000 and 52,000 miles respectively; at the equator the atmosphere must extend more than 21,000 miles above the ground. At these distances from the ground the gravitational force of the earth is just equal to the centrifugal force due to rotation.

   

   From the measurement of the pressure of the earth’s atmosphere, measurement based also on the principles of gravitation, it has been deduced that the atmosphere is but 17 (not 21,000) miles high.

   Observations of the flight of meteorites and of the polar auroras lead to the conjecture that the atmosphere reaches to a height of 130 miles (meteorites) or over 400 miles (polar auroras). Radio measurements yield about 200 miles for the upper layer recognizable through this method of investigation.

   Two computations, both based on the principle of gravitation, differ in the proportion of 17 and 21,000. Direct observations do not justify either of the computed figures.

   

   
   Cyclones, characterized by low pressure and by winds blowing toward their centers, move counterclockwise in the northern hemisphere and clockwise in the southern hemisphere. This movement of air currents in cyclonic vortices is generally explained as the effect of the earth’s rotation.

   

   Anticyclones, characterized by high pressure and by winds blowing from their centers move clockwise in the northern hemisphere and counterclockwise in the southern hemisphere. The movement of anticyclones has not been explained and is regarded as enigmatic.

   Cyclones and anticyclones are considered a problem of fluidal motion with highest or lowest pressure in the center. As the movement of anticyclones cannot be explained by the mechanistic principles of gravitation and rotation, it must be concluded that the rotation of cyclones is also unexplained.

   

   
   The area of land in the northern hemisphere of the earth is to the area of land in the southern hemisphere as three is to one. The mean weight of the land is two and three-quarter times heavier than that of water; assuming the depth of the seas in both hemispheres to be equal, the northern hemisphere up to sea level is heavier than the southern hemisphere, if judged by sea and land distribution; the earth masses above sea level are additional heavy loads. But this unequal distribution of masses does not affect the position of the earth, as it does not place the northern hemisphere with its face to the sun. A “dead force” like gravitation could not keep the unequally loaded earth in equilibrium. Also, the seasonal distribution of ice and snow, shifting in a distillation process from one hemisphere to the other, should interfere with the equilibrium of the earth, but fails to do so.

   

   

   
   Mountainous masses do not exert the gravitational pull expected by the theory of gravitation. The influence of the largest mass on the earth, the Himalaya, was carefully investigated with plumb line on the Indian side. The plumb line is not deflected as calculated in advance.(7) “The attraction of the mountain-ground thus computed on the theory of gravitation, is considerably greater than is necessary to explain the anomalies observed. This singular conclusion, I confess, at first surprised me very much.” (G. B. Airy.(8)) Out of this embarrassment grew the idea of isostasy. This hypothesis explains the lack of gravitational pull by the mountains in the following way. The interior of the globe is supposed to be fluid, and the crust is supposed to float on it. The inner fluid or magma is heavier or denser, the crust is lighter. Where there is a mountainous elevation, there must also be a protuberance beneath the mountains, this immersed protuberance being of lesser mass than the magma of equal volume. The way seismic waves travel, and computations of the elasticity of the interior of the earth, force the conclusion that the earth must be as rigid as steel; but if the earth is solid for only 2000 miles from the surface, the crust must be more rigid than steel. These conclusions are not reconcilable with the principle of isostasy, which presupposes a fluid magma less than 60 miles below the surface of the earth. There remains “a contradiction between isostasy and geophysical data.” (9)

   

   

   
   Over the oceans, the gravitational pull is greater than over the continents, though according to the theory of gravitation the reverse should be true; the hypothesis of isostasy also is unable to explain this phenomenon.(10)The gravitational pull drops at the coast line of the continents. Furthermore, the distribution of gravitation in the sea often has the peculiarity of being stronger where the water is deeper. “In the whole Gulf and Caribbean region the generalization seems to hold that the deeper the water, the more strongly positive the anomalies.” (11)

   

   As far as observations could establish, the sea tides do not influence the plumb line, which is contrary to what is expected. Observations on reservoirs of water, where the mass of water could be increased and decreased, gave none of the results anticipated on the basis of the theory of gravitation.(12)

   

   
   The atmospheric pressure of the sun, instead of being 27.47 times greater than the atmospheric pressure of the earth (as expected because of the gravitational pull of the large solar mass), is much smaller: the pressure there varies according to the layers of the atmosphere from one-tenth to one-thousandth of the barometric pressure on the earth;(13) at the base of the reversing layer the pressure is 0.005 of the atmospheric pressure at sea level on the earth;(14) in the sunspots, the pressure drops to one ten-thousandth of the pressure on the earth.

   

   The pressure of light is sometimes referred to as to explain the low atmospheric pressure on the sun. At the surface of the sun, the pressure of light must be 2.75 milligrams per square centimeter; a cubic centimeter of one gram weight at the surface of the earth would weigh 27.47 grams at the surface of the sun. Thus the attraction by the solar mass is 10,000 times greater than the repulsion of the solar light. Recourse is taken to the supposition that if the pull and the pressure are calculated for very small masses, the pressure exceeds the pull, one acting in proportion to the surface, the other in proportion to the volume.(15) But if this is so, why is the lowest pressure of the solar atmosphere observed over the sunspots where the light pressure is least?

   

   
   Because of its swift rotation, the gaseous sun should have the latitudinal axis greater than the longitudinal, but it does not have it. The sun is one million times larger than the earth, and its day is but twenty-six times longer than the terrestrial day; the swiftness of its rotation at its equator is over 125 km. per minute; at the poles, the velocity approaches zero. Yet the solar disk is not oval but round: the majority of observers even find a small excess in the longitudinal axis of the sun.(16) The planets act in the same manner as the rotation of the sun, imposing a latitudinal pull on the luminary.

   

   Gravitation that acts in all directions equally leaves unexplained the spherical shape of the sun. As we saw in the preceding section, the gases of the solar atmosphere are not under a strong pressure, but under a very weak one. Therefore, the computation, according to which the ellipsoidity of the sun, that is lacking, should be slight, is not correct either. Since the gases are under a very low gravitational pressure, the centrifugal force of rotation must have formed quite a flat sun.

   Near the polar regions of the sun, streamers of the corona are observed, which prolong still more the axial length of the sun.

   

   
   If planets and satellites were once molten masses, as cosmological theories assume, they would not have been able to obtain a spherical form, especially those which do not rotate, as Mercury or the moon (with respect to its primary).

   

   

   
   The Harmonic Law of Kepler views the movements of the planets as depending only on their distance from the sun. According to Newton, the masses of the sun and the planets must also enter the formulas. The Newtonian orbits differ from the Keplerian, found empirically. The Newtonian formula has a sum of masses (instead of a product of masses), and in view of the largeness of the sun, the Newtonian orbits are supposed to not deviate substantially from the Keplerian.(17)

   

   

   
   Perturbations of planets due to their reciprocal action are pronounced in repulsion as well as attraction. A perturbation displacing a planet or a satellite by a few seconds of arc must direct it from its orbit. It is assumed that the orbits of all planets and satellites did not change because of perturbations. A regulating force emanating from the primary appears to act. In the gravitational system there is no place left for such regulating forces.

   

   

   
   The perturbating activity appears unstable in the major planets, Jupiter and Saturn: Between the minimum of the year 1898-99 and the maximum of the 1916-17 there was found an 18 percent difference.(18) As these planets did not increase in mass in the meantime, this change is not understandable from the point of view of the theory of gravitation, which includes the principle of the immutable gravitational constant.

   

   

   
   The pressure of light emanating from the sun should slowly change the orbits of the satellites, pushing them more than the primaries, and acting constantly, this pressure should have the effect of acceleration: the pressure of light per unit of mass is greater in relation to the satellites than in relation to their primaries. But this change fails to materialize; a regulating force seems to overcome this unequal light pressure on primaries and secondaries.

   

   

   
   The sun moves in space at a velocity of about twenty kilometers a second (in relation to the nearby stars). This motion, according to Lodge, must change the eccentricities of some of the planetary orbits to an extent which far exceeds the observed values.(19)

   

   

   
   The motion of the perihelia of Mercury and Mars and of the nodes of Venus differ from what is computed with the help of the Newtonian law of gravitation. Einstein showed how his theory can account for the anomaly of Mercury; however, the smaller irregularities in the movements of Venus and Mars cannot be accounted for by Einstein’s formulas.

   

   

   
   Unaccounted for fluctuations in the lunar mean motion were calculated from the records of lunar eclipses of many centuries and from modern observations. These fluctuations were studied by S. Newcomb, who wrote: “I regard these fluctuations as the most enigmatic phenomenon presented by the celestial motions, being so difficult to account for by the action of any known causes, that we cannot but suspect them to arise from some action in nature hitherto unknown.” (20) They are not explainable by the forces of gravitation which emanate from the sun and the planets.

   

   

   
   It was found that “the strength of radio reception was nearly doubled with the passing of the moon from overhead to underneath the observer … It does not appear reasonable that the relatively small gravitational tide in the earth’s atmosphere, which changes the barometric pressure by less than half of one percent, could account for a sufficient change in altitude of the ionized layer to produce such marked changes in the intensity of reception.” (21)

   

   The lifting of the ionosphere generally results in better radio reception, and the small tidal action by the moon when overhead should improve reception a little, not impair it; in any event, the moon cannot have a marked effect on the ionosphere without being itself a charged body. But if the moon is charged, it cannot behave in its motion as though the gravitational force alone acts between it and the earth.

   

   
   The tails of the comets do not obey the principle of gravitation and are repelled by the sun. “There is beyond question some profound secret and mystery of nature concerned in the phenomenon of their tails” ; enormous sweep which it (the tail) makes round the sun in perihelion, in the manner of a straight and rigid rod, is in defiance of the law of gravitation, nay, even of the recorded laws of motion” (J. Herschel).(22)

   “What has puzzled astronomers since the time of Newton, is the fact that while all other bodies in the sidereal universe, as far as we are aware, obey the law of gravitation, comets’ tails are clearly subject to some strong repulsive force, which drives the matter composing them away from the sun with enormously high velocities” (W.H. Pickering)

   

   
   The change in the angular velocity of comets (especially of the comet Encke) is not in accord with the theoretical computations based on the theory of gravitation.(23)

   

   

   
   Meteors, after entering the terrestrial atmosphere at about 200 km. above the ground, are violently displaced toward the east. These displacements of the meteors are usually ascribed to winds blowing in the upper atmosphere.(24) The atmospheric pressure at a height of 45 km. is supposed to be but “a small fraction of one millimeter of mercury.” (25) On the other hand, the velocity with which the meteors approach the earth is between 15 and 75 km. per second, on the average about 40 km. per second or over 140,000 km. per hour. If winds of 150 km. per hour velocity were permanently blowing at the height where the meteors become visible, it would not be possible for such winds of rarefied atmosphere to visibly deflect stones falling at the rate of 140,000 km. per hour.

   

   Approaching the earth, the meteorites suddenly slow down and turn aside, and some are even repelled into space. “A few meteors give the appearance of penetrating into our atmosphere and then leaving it, ricocheting as it were.” (26)

   

   
   The earth is a huge magnet; it has electric currents in the ground and is enveloped by a number of layers of electrified ionosphere. The sun possesses an electric charge and magnetic poles; also the sunspots are found to be powerful magnets. The ionosphere is permanently charged by particles arriving from the sun; sunspots actively influence terrestrial magnetism, ground currents, the ionosphere’s charge, and auroras. As the principle of gravitation leaves no room for the participation of other forces in the ordinary movements of the celestial mechanism, these obvious and permanent influences of the electromagnetic state of the sun on the magnetic field of the earth, the ionosphere, the auroras, and the earth currents are not allowed to have more than zero effect on the astronomical position of the earth, and this for the sake of maintaining the integrity of the gravitational principle.

   

   Sun and moon, comets, planets, satellites, and meteorites – all the heavenly host – air and water, mountain massifs and sea tides, each and all of them(27) disobey the “law of laws” which is supposed to know no exception.

* * *



To the empirical evidences of the fallacy of the law of gravitation four well known difficulties of the gravitational theory can be added:




   
   Gravitation acts in no time. Laplace calculated that, in order to keep the solar system together, the gravitational pull must propagate with a velocity at least fifty million times greater than the velocity of light. A physical agent requires time to cover distance. Gravitation defies time.

   

   

   
   Matter acts where it is not, or in abstentia, through no physical agent. This is a defiance of space. Newton was aware of this difficulty when he wrote in a letter to Bentley: “That gravity should be innate, inherent, and essential to matter, so that one body can act upon another at a distance through a vacuum without the mediation of anything else, by and through which their action and force may be conveyed from one to another, is to me so great an absurdity that I believe no man, who has in philosophical matters a competent faculty of thinking, can ever fall into it.” Leibnitz opposed the theory of gravitation for this very reason.

   

   

   
   Gravitational force is unchangeable by any and all agents or by any medium through which it passes, always propagating as the inverse square of the distances. “Gravitation is entirely independent of everything that influences other natural phenomena” (De Sitter(28)). This is a defiance of the principles governing other energies.

   

   

   
   Every particle in the universe must be under a tendency to be pulled apart because of the infinite mass in the universe: it is pulled to all sides by all the matter in space.

   

A few additional remarks about the motion of bodies in the universe which bear upon the theory of gravitation are added here:




   
   The notion of the tangential escape or inertia of the primary motion of the planets and satellites, being adopted by all cosmogonical theories of post-Newtonian days, led all of them into insurmountable difficulties. The retrograde motion of some satellites is one of these difficulties.

   

   

   
   The principle of gravitation demands an ultimate balling of all matter in the cosmos. This is not in harmony with spectral observations, which suggest even an “expanding universe”

   

   

   
   “An atom differs from the solar system by the fact that it is not gravitation that makes the electrons go round the nucleus, but electricity.” (B. Russell). Different principles are supposed to govern the motion of the planetary bodies in the macrocosm and microcosm.(29)

   

* * *

Newton explained the principle underlying the motion of the planets and the satellites by the example of a stone thrown horizontally from a mountain with such force that gravitation bends its flight so that it revolves around the earth, coming back to exactly the same place, once again to repeat the course of its flight. But he admits “It is not to be conceived that mere mechanical causes could give birth to so many regular motions,” and invokes an act of Providence in providing each satellite with a tangential push of a strength which, together with the pull of the primary, creates an orbit. (General Scholium to Book III of thePrincipia) The inertia of the tangential (instantaneous) push has not exhausted itself in all the eons despite the tidal friction between a satellite and its primary, or the sun pulling the satellite away from the primary, or the resistance of matter (meteorites) in space, though all these forces act permanently and therefore with acceleration.

* * *

Newton’s gravitational theory is regarded as proved by the action of the tides. But studying the tides, Newton came to the conclusion that the moon has a mass equal to one fortieth of the earth. Modern calculations, based on the theory of gravitation (but not on the action of the tides), ascribe to the moon a mass equal to 1/81 of the earth’s mass.(30)

The greatest triumph of the theory of gravitation was the discovery of the planet Neptune, the position of which was calculated simultaneously by Adams and Leverrier from the perturbations experienced by Uranus. But in the controversy which ensued concerning the priority in announcing the existence of Neptune, it was stressed that neither of the two scholars was the real discoverer, as both of them calculated very erroneously the distance of Neptune from the orbit of Uranus.(31) Yet, even if the computations were correct, there would be no proof that gravitation and not another energy acts between Uranus and Neptune. The gravitational pull decreases as the square of the distance. Electricity and magnetism act in the same way. Newton was mistaken when he ascribed to magnetism a decrease that follows the cube of the distance.(32)

Building his System of the World, Newton put before his readers “Rules of Reasoning in Philosophy.” The First Rule is: “We are to admit no more causes of natural things than such as are both true and sufficient to explain their appearances.” Rule II is : “Therefore, to the same natural effects we must, as far as possible, assign the same causes.”

Date: 2013/06/06 13:47:05, Link
Author: Thrinaxodon
Quote (sparc @ June 06 2013,11:21)
Seems that the even UDiots rather start a new thread than continuing the original one which has been spamed with BA77 comments.

It wasn't spammed by BornAgain77. It was simply a discussion that got over-ran.

Date: 2013/06/06 13:48:49, Link
Author: Thrinaxodon
AGW is a myth. For example, some if the glaciers are getting larger.

Date: 2013/06/06 15:19:31, Link
Author: Thrinaxodon
Quote (OgreMkV @ June 06 2013,14:34)
Quote (Thrinaxodon @ June 06 2013,13:48)
AGW is a myth. For example, some if the glaciers are getting larger.

Name one glacier that is larger today than it was 10 years ago.

There's been glaciers growing in Alaska, Norway, etc.

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008....g-again

Date: 2013/06/07 08:41:00, Link
Author: Thrinaxodon
Quote (fnxtr @ June 06 2013,19:57)
[Graffiti moved to Bathroom Wall. - Lou FCD]<br/><br/>Okay, that's Markuzian.

No, I'm not Markuze. Murkuze would have a Montreal IP. I have multiple (i.e. proxy).

Date: 2013/06/07 08:50:30, Link
Author: Thrinaxodon
Quote (KevinB @ June 07 2013,08:44)
Quote (Thrinaxodon @ June 07 2013,08:41)
 
Quote (fnxtr @ June 06 2013,19:57)
[Graffiti moved to Bathroom Wall. - Lou FCD]<br/><br/>Okay, that's Markuzian.

No, I'm not Markuze. Murkuze would have a Montreal IP. I have multiple (i.e. proxy).


Markuzihausen-by-proxy?

Do you think Markuze has access to UseNet? Does he know what proxies are? Does he know how to create a website?

Date: 2013/06/07 09:30:33, Link
Author: Thrinaxodon
THRINAXODON PRESENTS THE EVIDENCE THAT HUMANS LIVED IN THE DEVONIAN.
IN A DEVONIAN FOSSIL BED, THRINAXODON FOUND CHAR. A SUBSTANCE THAT IS
EVIDENCE OF ASH. HE WAS AMAZED. IT IS THE OLDEST EVIDENCE OF HUMAN
FIRE. EVEN MORE DISTANT THAN 1 Ma.
======================================
Thrinaxodon scaring this guy, to DEATH.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v....in6PIo8

======================================
Thrinaxodon, in the form of prion, infecting this person's temporal
lobe, and causing DEATH SLOWLY!!!!
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped....gios...

PROOF OF LIFE AFTER DEATH
http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_....z5q.jpg

=================================
THRINAXODON KILLS A RABBIT WITH A COUPLE OTHER PEOPLE
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped....uret...
=================================
THRINAXODON IS NOW ON TWITTER.

Date: 2013/06/07 10:37:39, Link
Author: Thrinaxodon
Quote (Occam's Toothbrush @ June 07 2013,10:24)
Quote (Thrinaxodon @ June 07 2013,10:30)
THRINAXODON PRESENTS THE EVIDENCE THAT HUMANS LIVED IN THE DEVONIAN.
IN A DEVONIAN FOSSIL BED, THRINAXODON FOUND CHAR. A SUBSTANCE THAT IS
EVIDENCE OF ASH. HE WAS AMAZED. IT IS THE OLDEST EVIDENCE OF HUMAN
FIRE. EVEN MORE DISTANT THAN 1 Ma.
======================================
Thrinaxodon scaring this guy, to DEATH.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v....in6PIo8

======================================
Thrinaxodon, in the form of prion, infecting this person's temporal
lobe, and causing DEATH SLOWLY!!!!
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped....gios...

PROOF OF LIFE AFTER DEATH
http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_....z5q.jpg

=================================
THRINAXODON KILLS A RABBIT WITH A COUPLE OTHER PEOPLE
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped....uret...
=================================
THRINAXODON IS NOW ON TWITTER.

ASH IS EVIDENCE OF HUMAN ACTIVITY BECAUSE NOTHING EVER CAUGHT ON FIRE UNTIL HUMANS INVENTED THE BIC LIGHTER 300 MILLION YEARS AGO N0STRADAMUS PREDICTED THIS WHEN HE WROTE THE BIBLE THEREFORE JESUS

(insert link to some youtube crap here)

Here's an explanation for your denial. They used flint.

Date: 2013/06/07 10:54:20, Link
Author: Thrinaxodon
Quote (OgreMkV @ June 07 2013,10:05)
Really?

Yes. I have even found a human femur, in the Devonian strata.

Date: 2013/06/07 11:33:17, Link
Author: Thrinaxodon
Quote (OgreMkV @ June 07 2013,11:19)
Quote (Thrinaxodon @ June 07 2013,10:54)
Quote (OgreMkV @ June 07 2013,10:05)
Really?

Yes. I have even found a human femur, in the Devonian strata.

Oh, of course.  Well, I guess that settles that, because you are a world renown archeologist and we'll just assume that you know what you are doing, are completely trustworthy, and sane.

/end snark

I have evidence, but the Leakey Foundation took it away.

Date: 2013/06/07 12:34:05, Link
Author: Thrinaxodon
Quote (OgreMkV @ June 07 2013,12:04)
Quote (Thrinaxodon @ June 07 2013,11:33)
Quote (OgreMkV @ June 07 2013,11:19)
 
Quote (Thrinaxodon @ June 07 2013,10:54)
 
Quote (OgreMkV @ June 07 2013,10:05)
Really?

Yes. I have even found a human femur, in the Devonian strata.

Oh, of course.  Well, I guess that settles that, because you are a world renown archeologist and we'll just assume that you know what you are doing, are completely trustworthy, and sane.

/end snark

I have evidence, but the Leakey Foundation took it away.

I feel your pain.  I am actually the only heir to the King of Siam.  But my father's ruthless adversaries have blocked my past so well, that even I can barely remember.  

I am the rightful King.

Bullshit! I'm telling the truth!! You're white, not East Asian.

Date: 2013/06/07 12:37:23, Link
Author: Thrinaxodon
And, I stand to the evidence.

Date: 2013/06/07 13:18:17, Link
Author: Thrinaxodon
THRINAXODON WAS SCOURING ANOTHER DEVONIAN FOSSIL BED, AND FOUND A
HUMAN SKULL, AND A HUMAN FEMUR. HE ANALYSED THE FINDS, AND SAW THAT
THEY WERE NOT NORMAL ROCKS. THESE WERE FOSSILIZED BONES. THEY EVEN HAD
TOOTH MARKS ON THEM. SO, THRINAXODON BROUGHT THEM TO THE LEAKEY
FOUNDATION, THEY UTTERLY DISMISSED IT, AND SAID, "We want to keep
people thinking that humans evolved 2 Ma." THRINAXODON BROUGHT HIS
SWORD, AND SAID, "SCIENCE CORRECTS ITSELF." RICHARD LEAKEY SAID, "That
is a myth, for people to believe in science."  THRINAXODON PLANS TO
BRING DOOM TO SCIENCE, ITSELF. EMAIL  TO FIND OUT
HOW.
=======================================
"False words are not only evil in themselves, but they infect the
soul
with evil." - Socrates
"To the divine providence it has seemed good to prepare in the world
to come for the righteous good things, which the unrighteous shall
not
enjoy; and for the wicked evil things, by which the good shall not be
tormented. But as for the good things of this life, and its ills, God
has willed that these should be common to both; that we might not too
eagerly covet the things which wicked men are seen equally to enjoy,
nor shrink with an unseemly fear from the ills which even good men
often suffer.
There is, too, a very great difference in the purpose served both by
those events which we call adverse and those called prosperous. For
the good man is neither uplifted with the good things of time, nor
broken by its ills; but the wicked man, because he is corrupted by
this world’s happiness, feels himself punished by its unhappiness." -
St. Augustine of Hippo
"I have loved righteousness and hated iniquity, and therefore I die
in
exile." - St. Gregory VII, His Last Words.
===================================
THRINAXODON UPDATED HIS PROFILE PICTURE.
http://thrinaxodon.wordpress.com/2013....ile-...
===================================
THRINAXODON IS NOW ON TWITTER. UseNettroll215@gmail.com

Date: 2013/06/07 14:52:32, Link
Author: Thrinaxodon
Quote (OgreMkV @ June 07 2013,14:47)
Just out of curiosity, you ever find the name of a glacier that's larger today than it was 10 years ago?

I told you, "a number of glaciers in Norway and Alaska are growing larger."

Date: 2013/06/07 15:48:39, Link
Author: Thrinaxodon
Quote (midwifetoad @ June 07 2013,14:55)
Quote (OgreMkV @ June 07 2013,14:47)
Just out of curiosity, you ever find the name of a glacier that's larger today than it was 10 years ago?

Apparently there are a few.

http://www.skepticalscience.com/himalay....ing.htm

Skeptical Science is a propaganda website. There's a blog, that carefully debunks the nonsense propagated by S.S. and others.

The blog

Date: 2013/06/07 16:24:31, Link
Author: Thrinaxodon
Quote (OgreMkV @ June 07 2013,16:17)
Yes, the whole point was that the goof ball can't actually name a glacier that's growing.  Alaska or Norway... Largest state in the US... maybe a little more specificity.

I've already done the research.

For example here: http://www.skepticalscience.com/himalay....ate.htm

From 1946-2005 228 glaciers world wide have been monitored.  Of those, the vast majority are shrinking (77% in 2002 and 94% in 2003).

Indeed, if you look at the link, it actually names the glaciers that are increasing in size. Shockingly, none of them are in Alaska.

So, our current troll is both lazy and ignorant.  Which was my entire point in asking the question.

The source is right here:

JamulBlog

Date: 2013/06/07 16:56:32, Link
Author: Thrinaxodon
Quote (blipey @ June 07 2013,16:37)
Quote (Thrinaxodon @ June 07 2013,16:24)
Quote (OgreMkV @ June 07 2013,16:17)
Yes, the whole point was that the goof ball can't actually name a glacier that's growing.  Alaska or Norway... Largest state in the US... maybe a little more specificity.

I've already done the research.

For example here: http://www.skepticalscience.com/himalay....ate.htm

From 1946-2005 228 glaciers world wide have been monitored.  Of those, the vast majority are shrinking (77% in 2002 and 94% in 2003).

Indeed, if you look at the link, it actually names the glaciers that are increasing in size. Shockingly, none of them are in Alaska.

So, our current troll is both lazy and ignorant.  Which was my entire point in asking the question.

The source is right here:

JamulBlog

Seriously?  Those links are 5 years old.  And if you read them, they say that the one year (2008) increase is an anomaly.

Wow, you're lazy.

At least it's accurate.

Date: 2013/06/07 17:08:54, Link
Author: Thrinaxodon
Quote (OgreMkV @ June 07 2013,16:58)
Quote (blipey @ June 07 2013,16:37)
Quote (Thrinaxodon @ June 07 2013,16:24)
 
Quote (OgreMkV @ June 07 2013,16:17)
Yes, the whole point was that the goof ball can't actually name a glacier that's growing.  Alaska or Norway... Largest state in the US... maybe a little more specificity.

I've already done the research.

For example here: http://www.skepticalscience.com/himalay....ate.htm

From 1946-2005 228 glaciers world wide have been monitored.  Of those, the vast majority are shrinking (77% in 2002 and 94% in 2003).

Indeed, if you look at the link, it actually names the glaciers that are increasing in size. Shockingly, none of them are in Alaska.

So, our current troll is both lazy and ignorant.  Which was my entire point in asking the question.

The source is right here:

JamulBlog

Seriously?  Those links are 5 years old.  And if you read them, they say that the one year (2008) increase is an anomaly.

Wow, you're lazy.

And the original source is Anthony Watts... a person who took money from the Heartland Institute, then lied about and has publicly declared "I'm prepared to accept whatever result they produce, even if it proves my premise wrong."

Nd then, when Mueller's work cause Mueller to accept AGW, Watts

Quote
backed off his position, saying the study is of no value because its parts have not been peer reviewed, "When the science and peer review is finished, the results are likely to look different." Watts said that much of the BEST data should be thrown out, "...there is no adjustment procedure in place to fix this, [...] BEST tries to solve it, and I applaud them for the attempt. But without knowing the history of the station, even their methodology doesn't deal with it".
 From WIkipedia... original source links at the Wikipedia site here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki.......logger)

So, Watts is a liar.  I wouldn't accept a report of rain from him unless I checked it myself.

But if you'd prefer to accept his word over every actual climate researcher, I can't stop you.  But I can laugh at you, long and loud.

Watts is a climate researcher. It is true. Doubt it if you want, but at least check it, moron.

Date: 2013/06/07 18:08:09, Link
Author: Thrinaxodon
Yes I can read. I checked with the latest news.

Date: 2013/06/15 14:54:54, Link
Author: Thrinaxodon
[Graffiti moved to Bathroom Wall. - Lou FCD]

The Velikovskian; your latest in Velikovskian research.

Date: 2013/06/20 12:48:45, Link
Author: Thrinaxodon
=================
6,000 ANTHROPOLOGISTS NOW DEAD.
=================
Thrinaxodon and others came with guns to kill the wily anthropologists
that were brainwashing people around the world. The anthropologists
came up with their guns, and shot AsfHlu Gofnin; the most powerful
person on OUR SIDE.
Eventually, it ended up with Thrinaxodon burning their supposed
"specimens", and shoving the Devonian finds up their asses.

They died with the burnings; and then Thrinaxdon's findings were taken
to a medical lab, where they were shown to be a 100% humanoid.
================

EVIDENCE THAT HUMANS LIVED IN THE DEVONIAN:

https://groups.google.com/group....7af24f#

https://groups.google.com/group....fb0b82#

====================================

http://thrinaxodon.wordpress.com/....ess.com

===================================

THE BASTARDS AT THE SMITHSONIAN, AND THE LEAKEY FOUNDATION ARE ERODING
WITH FEAR.

===========================
THESE ASSHOLES ARE GOING TO DIE:
THOMAS AQUINAS;
ALDOUS HUXLEY;
BOB CASANVOVA;
SkyEyes;
DAVID IAIN GRIEG;
MARK ISAAK;
JOHN HARSHAM;
RICHARD NORMAN;
DR. DOOLITTLE;
CHARLES DARWIN;
MARK HORTON;
ERIK SIMPSON;
HYPATIAB7;
PAUL J. GANS;
JILLERY;
WIKI TRIK;
THRINAXODON;
PETER NYIKOS;
RON OKIMOTO;
JOHN S. WILKINS
===========================

THRINAXODON WAS SCOURING ANOTHER DEVONIAN FOSSIL BED, AND FOUND A
HUMAN SKULL, AND A HUMAN FEMUR. HE ANALYSED THE FINDS, AND SAW THAT
THEY WERE NOT NORMAL ROCKS. THESE WERE FOSSILIZED BONES. THEY EVEN HAD
TOOTH MARKS ON THEM. SO, THRINAXODON BROUGHT THEM TO THE LEAKEY
FOUNDATION, THEY UTTERLY DISMISSED IT, AND SAID, "We want to keep
people thinking that humans evolved 2 Ma." THRINAXODON BROUGHT HIS
SWORD, AND SAID, "SCIENCE CORRECTS ITSELF." RICHARD LEAKEY SAID, "That
is a myth, for people to believe in science." THRINAXODON PLANS TO
BRING DOOM TO SCIENCE, ITSELF.

============================

THRINAXODON IS NOW ON TWITTER.

Date: 2013/06/23 13:55:52, Link
Author: Thrinaxodon
[Graffiti moved to Bathroom Wall. - Lou FCD]

Quote (Quack @ June 18 2013,04:37)
New Subduction Zone Found. (Science Daily.)

What about the mid-Atlantic ridge, I thought the Atlantic would continue widening?

The Atlantic is shortening. According to reports, the Atlantic shortens about 4 inches every year. Within 20 years, it will be 80 inches smaller.


DO THE MATH.

Date: 2013/06/25 18:51:09, Link
Author: Thrinaxodon
Quote (dhogaza @ June 20 2013,18:37)
"Watts is a climate researcher. It is true. Doubt it if you want, but at least check it, moron."

Watts is a college dropout.  In other words, his highest academic accomplishment is a high school diploma.

His only claim to relevance is the fact that he used to read weather reports on TV.  He is not and never has been a meteorologist, much less a "climate researcher".

Among other things, he has demonstrated time and time again that he doesn't understand junior high school algebra much less any higher maths such as high school trigonometry.

He also doesn't understand chemistry or physics at even the most lay of layman levels.

This is your galileo ...

[...]


<moron.>


Fuck you.

Watts is a climate researcher. He correctly pointed out that, since glaciers are growing, it contradicts AGW.

Date: 2013/06/25 18:57:13, Link
Author: Thrinaxodon
Quote (fnxtr @ June 25 2013,09:57)
Quote (Quack @ June 25 2013,02:02)
Quote (fnxtr @ June 23 2013,15:11)
Looks like the oceanic plate ridge is still spreading but instead of carrying continental plates apart, said oceanic plate is starting to subduct at its margins.


I did a google: here

Science ftw again!

So yeah, looks like MAR is still spreading. Subduction in the Caribbean, according to wiki.

Proof that the Atlantic is shortening.

:)

Date: 2013/06/25 19:54:14, Link
Author: Thrinaxodon
===================
>ALERT! ALERT!
===================
>
5 ANTHROPOLOGISTS TODAY WERE CAUGHT SELLING POT TO UNWARY VICTIMS CALLED 'STUDENTS'. THEY TOLD THE STUDENTS IT WILL HELP THEM PASS THEIR EXAM. BUT IN REALITY; IT WASHES AWAY CRITICAL THINKING.
>
AND ONCE THEY GET BRAINWASHED, THEY WILL TURN INTO DOG BARKING EVOLUTIONISTS.
>
===================================

EVIDENCE THAT HUMANS LIVED IN THE DEVONIAN:

https://groups.google.com/group....7af24f#

https://groups.google.com/group....fb0b82#

====================================

http://thrinaxodon.wordpress.com/....ess.com

===================================

THE BASTARDS AT THE SMITHSONIAN, AND THE LEAKEY FOUNDATION ARE ERODING
WITH FEAR.
===================================

When Thrinaxodon heard they were in prison, he went bananas.
He told the Agents that they believed in Darwinism, and were
indoctrinating the students.

He was interviewed by Paula Zahna of had this to say:

"I..I...I...Can't believe it. This completely disproved Darwinian
orthodoxy."

===================================


These were some of the bastards arrested:


John Adair
Giulio Angioni
Talal Asad
Timothy Asch

Nigel Barley
Fredrik Barth
Vasily Bartold
Keith H. Basso
Daisy Bates
Ruth Behar
Ruth Benedict
Lee Berger
Theodore C. Bestor
Lewis Binford
Wilhelm Bleek
Anton Blok
Franz Boas
Dmitri Bondarenko
Pere Bosch-Gimpera
Pierre Bourdieu
Brent Berlin
Paul Broca
Sir Peter Buck

Mauro Campagnoli
Edmund Carpenter
Napoleon Chagnon
Alberto Mario Cirese
Pierre Clastres
Carleton S. Coon
Frank Hamilton Cushing

Regna Darnell
Raymond Dart
Ella Cara Deloria
Raymond J. DeMallie
Ernesto de Martino
Stanley Diamond
Mary Douglas
Eugene Dubois
Ann Dunham
Sam Dunn
Émile Durkheim

E. E. Evans-Pritchard
Arturo Escobar

Raymond Firth
Raymond D. Fogelson
Meyer Fortes
Diane Fossey
Michel Foucault
James Frazer
James Ferguson

Geri-Ann Galanti
Clifford Geertz
Alfred Gell
Ernest Gellner
Max Gluckman
Maurice Godelier
Jane Goodall
David Graeber
Hilma Granqvist
J. Patrick Gray
Marcel Griaule
Jacob Grimm
Wilhelm Grimm

Michael Harkin
Michael Harner
John P. Harrington
Marvin Harris
Jacquetta Hawkes
Edgar Lee Hewett
Arthur Maurice Hocart
Earnest Hooton
Robin W.G. Horton draft
Ian Hodder
E. Adamson Hoebel
Aleš Hrdli?ka
Patrick Hunout
Zora Neale Hurston
Dell Hymes

Miyako Inoue (linguistic anthropologist)

John M. Janzen
William Jones (philologist)

Sergei Kan
Jomo Kenyatta
David Kertzer
Anatoly Khazanov
Richard G. Klein
Dorinne K. Kondo
Andrey Korotayev
Conrad Kottak
Grover Krantz
Charles H. Kraft
Alfred L. Kroeber
Theodora Kroeber
Lars Krutak
Adam Kuper

William Labov
George Lakoff
Harold E. Lambert
Edmund Leach
Murray Leaf
Louis Leakey
Mary Leakey
Richard Leakey
Richard Borshay Lee
Charles Miller Leslie
Claude Lévi-Strauss
Robert Lowie
Nancy Lurie

Alan Macfarlane
Saba Mahmood
Bronis?aw Malinowski
George Marcus
John Alden Mason
Marcel Mauss
Phillip McArthur
Margaret Mead
Mervyn Meggitt
Josef Mengele
Nicholas Miklouho-Maclay — Asia-Pacific (Maclay Coast, Papua New-
Guinea; Australia]
Emily Martin
Sidney Mintz
Ashley Montagu
James Mooney
John H. Moore
Lewis H. Morgan
George Murdock

Laura Nader
Raoul Naroll
Erland Nordenskiöld
Jeremy Narby

Gananath Obeyesekere
Marvin Opler
Morris Opler
Sherry Ortner
Keith F. Otterbein

Bruce Parry (television show host)
Elsie Clews Parsons
Bronislav Pilsudski
Hortense Powdermaker
A.H.J. Prins
Harald E.L. Prins

James Quesada

Paul Rabinow
Wilhelm Radloff
Roy Rappaport
Hans Ras
Alfred Reginald Radcliffe-Brown
Gerardo Reichel-Dolmatoff
Kathy Reichs
Audrey Richards
W. H. R. Rivers
Paul Rivet
Eric Ross
Gayle Rubin
Robert A. Rubinstein

Marshall Sahlins
Roger Sandall
Edward Sapir
Nancy Scheper-Hughes
Wilhelm Schmidt
Tobias Schneebaum
Thayer Scudder
Elman Service
Afanasy Shchapov
Cathy Small
Jacques Soustelle
Melford Spiro
James Spradley
Julian Steward
Pradip Kumar Singh
Herbert Spencer
Marilyn Strathern
William Sturtevant
Niara Sudarkasa

Michael Taussig
Edward Burnett Tylor
Colin Turnbull
Terence Turner
Victor Turner
Bruce Trigger

Verrier Elwin
Karl Verner
L. P. Vidyarthi

Camilla Wedgwood
Hank Wesselman
Douglas R. White
Leslie White
Tim White
Benjamin Whorf
Unni Wikan
Clark Wissler
Eric Wolf
Sol Worth
===================================

THRINAXODON'S NOW ON TWITTER.

Date: 2013/06/28 12:29:51, Link
Author: Thrinaxodon
Quote (GaryGaulin @ June 28 2013,10:29)
Quote (GaryGaulin @ June 27 2013,23:22)
Quote (Merc @ June 27 2013,20:16)
The sad thing is that I've done far more to test her hypothesis than she has--inadvertently, with a completely different goal.

Would someone like to ask her why they didn't cite our papers, given their relevance?

As the devil's advocate I have to say that that Biologic Institute only exists to test the hypothesis:

Certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.

If you found evidence that the above hypothesis is true then they would certainly be interested.

And for the guests in the forum who are wondering what the above post is all about, it's from trying to reply to another thread. Either the forum software or my computer was admittedly rigged (virus?) to prevent/censor my participation in all other discussions in this forum. Anything I post elsewhere in this forum ends up in this thread, where I'm then plastered with insults until it's buried in their rubbish.

Do what I do...And troll in other threads. Get your computer fixed. Or, download a proxy. Of course, it will always go back to, a) BW, b) our threads. But, it still works.

Date: 2013/06/28 12:33:21, Link
Author: Thrinaxodon
[Graffiti moved to Bathroom Wall. - Lou FCD]

Quote (fnxtr @ June 26 2013,15:48)
Quote (Thrinaxodon @ June 25 2013,16:57)
Quote (fnxtr @ June 25 2013,09:57)
 
Quote (Quack @ June 25 2013,02:02)
 
Quote (fnxtr @ June 23 2013,15:11)
Looks like the oceanic plate ridge is still spreading but instead of carrying continental plates apart, said oceanic plate is starting to subduct at its margins.


I did a google: here

Science ftw again!

So yeah, looks like MAR is still spreading. Subduction in the Caribbean, according to wiki.

Proof that the Atlantic is shortening.

:)

You probably mean "narrowing". Shortening to most minds means in the north-south direction. And... maybe.

Proof of my theory. The theory states that, "Eventually all the worlds will lock back up. Leading to the process of evolution to start all over." In fact; birds were once large, and existed since the Cambrian. But, at Pangaea, there was a loss of air, and birds devolved to small size.

Date: 2013/06/28 14:18:45, Link
Author: Thrinaxodon
Quote (GaryGaulin @ June 28 2013,12:55)
Quote (Thrinaxodon @ June 28 2013,12:29)
 
Quote (GaryGaulin @ June 28 2013,10:29)
 
Quote (GaryGaulin @ June 27 2013,23:22)
   
Quote (Merc @ June 27 2013,20:16)
The sad thing is that I've done far more to test her hypothesis than she has--inadvertently, with a completely different goal.

Would someone like to ask her why they didn't cite our papers, given their relevance?

As the devil's advocate I have to say that that Biologic Institute only exists to test the hypothesis:

Certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.

If you found evidence that the above hypothesis is true then they would certainly be interested.

And for the guests in the forum who are wondering what the above post is all about, it's from trying to reply to another thread. Either the forum software or my computer was admittedly rigged (virus?) to prevent/censor my participation in all other discussions in this forum. Anything I post elsewhere in this forum ends up in this thread, where I'm then plastered with insults until it's buried in their rubbish.

Do what I do...And troll in other threads. Get your computer fixed. Or, download a proxy. Of course, it will always go back to, a) BW, b) our threads. But, it still works.

Are you saying that my computer system was remotely altered? If true then how was this accomplished?

Did you download anything? If you did, there *might* have been spyware there.

Date: 2013/07/06 10:17:35, Link
Author: Thrinaxodon
Quote (Quack @ June 27 2013,15:05)
Don't know how much of a news item this may be but it was recently announced here that thorium is being 'burned' in Halden, home of the HBWR. IIRC, it said that thorium with 20% plutonium added is used in a conventional reactor. The experiment will run for several years but results already looks better than predicted.

CREATING THORIUM IN LABORATORIES POLLUTES THE ENVIRONMENT.

Date: 2013/07/06 10:19:53, Link
Author: Thrinaxodon
Quote (Arctodus23 @ June 30 2013,10:47)
Quote (Soapy Sam @ June 30 2013,04:32)
Quote (Arctodus23 @ June 30 2013,05:54)
   
Quote (Thrinaxodon @ June 25 2013,19:54)
===================
>ALERT! ALERT![...]

That`s a lot of crap, again. Stop this nonsense, and troll somewhere else.

Nah, he's allowed to troll his own thread, surely?

Almost Mabus-like at times.

If you see his posts @ UseNet, that`ll be sure to knock you. He`s comparable to Ed Conrad, though Thrinaxodon and Conrad have said they're not each other.

F*CK YOU APIDIUM23.

Date: 2013/07/12 03:09:35, Link
Author: Thrinaxodon
Quote (stevestory @ July 11 2013,10:37)
I don't really get the point of thrinaxodon. No idea what's going on there.

IT'S CALLED THE TRUTH. HUMANS HAVE ORIGINS IN THE DEVONIAN. ADMIT, SCIENCE HAS BEEN WRONG BEFORE...

Date: 2013/08/07 05:41:02, Link
Author: Thrinaxodon
==============================
>THE TRUTH COMES MARCHING IN...
==============================
>
THE SMITHSONIAN PLEADES AS THRINAXODON REVEALS MAN IS AS OLD AS COAL:

https://groups.google.com/forum....igqX9Ts
>
HE APPEARED ON LOPEZ TONIGHT, AND THE O'REILLY SHOW TO ANNOUNCE HIS
DISCOVERY.
>
PLEASE LET THIS NEWS GET TO DAVID IAIN GREIG, THE KING OF THE TYRRANICAL
EVOLUTIONISTS.
>
==================================
>
BUT WAIT; THERE'S MORE:

> https://groups.google.com/forum...._mmvhu0
>
Thrinaxodon also GOES TO COURT:

https://groups.google.com/forum...._8cZ4IM
>
==================================
>
MAN AS OLD AS FROGS
>
http://thrinaxodon.wordpress.com/faq....faq
>
THRINAXON NOW ON FACEBOOK.

Date: 2013/08/07 05:46:46, Link
Author: Thrinaxodon
Quote (Jim_Wynne @ Aug. 06 2013,07:25)
Quote
I’m not sure how it manages some of the things that it’s now doing, but I can tell that my hunch about periodic signaling (more like a real brain) leading to complex behaviors was correct. Being able to do anything it wants seems to have added the concept of “I want” to its cognitive awareness, even though the simple circuit hardly looks like it’s capable of that. Have to add the dimension of time (that’s in all of the models including ones at PSC) to what you see for a circuit. What was just added is the dichotomy between what it has to do, and what it wants to do that’s more (confidence raising) fun, which over running time also becomes expressed in the resulting intelligent entity.
My emphasis.

Herein lies the seat of Gary's delusions.  He's written a program such that his little bug does only what he's told it to do, yet he says he's not sure how it does it.  He thinks his bug is really doing what *it* wants to do.  

I think this concept is sufficiently deep that Gary can never be brought to understand that it's wrong, and trivially wrong.  Of course, there's some variety of Morton's Demon guarding the door to his cognitive functions, but I really think this is a case of a guy who's not smart enough to know what he's doing who's sure that he is smart enough.  A dash of Dunning-Kruger for good measure.

I know how to program. And I'm coding one that disproves YOU, EVOLUTIONISTS.

Date: 2013/08/07 05:50:36, Link
Author: Thrinaxodon
Quote (Lou FCD @ July 23 2013,20:13)
Quote (Procynosuchus @ July 07 2013,11:45)
THE SMITHSONIAN HAS BEEN OFFICIALLY SHUT DOWN;

Interesting. I was just there last week, and it seemed fine to me.

It's true. The destruction is happening real soon.

Date: 2014/01/09 22:29:43, Link
Author: Thrinaxodon
Quote (Woodbine @ Aug. 07 2013,06:26)

Hey, dick!

MAN AS OLD AS FROGS!
>
OGREMKV RECENTLY SHOT IN THE FOOT AFTER CAUGHT RAIDING THRINAXODON'S HOUSE FOR THE FOSSILS!
>
Thrinaxodon caught Ogre, then pulled out his glock and said, "get the Hell away from them you bitch!" Thrinaxodon then called the cops, only for Mkv to run, a subsequent gun battle happened.
>
Then he burned the fossils, only for God to come out strike him with lightening. He was arrested for arson, and robbery. Take that, evolutionists dumbasses.

Date: 2014/01/09 22:37:05, Link
Author: Thrinaxodon
Quote (jeffox @ Jan. 08 2014,13:12)
Quote
Back in the Ben Stein movie days I let the NCSE know that they needed to change tactics, not be polar opposite to the other political extreme, but nothing changed. I do not want to see them lose all their credibility, but they're only helping make it so that they are no better than the worse in this forum. It's like the two enable each other. Where the NCSE long ago fixed their Expelled Exposed (making it more convincing as well) then went from there, what goes on in this forum would not now be accepted behavior. It would have then been easy for me to find help maybe from one of the many local colleges, where they end up in the science news for novel cell models, instead of their having to worry about their careers by getting involved in something good like that.


Why not get a job and then actually go to one of those colleges and LEARN SOMETHING?  Then, maybe you'll realize how wrong you are about the politicization (and polarization) of the NCSE, and how thier scientific 'snobbery' is necessary to screen out the nonsense of the cranks and crackpots that you support.  Until then, please stop blaming us for your own misfortune - it's been based on YOUR OWN DECISIONS AND ACTIONS, not ours.

Of course, continuing your usual idiot ravings in here will still result in scoffing and outright laughter on our part.  We've already told you (many times) how to solve your problems.  Not listening isn't our fault.  

Whatta hoot!

Hey, dick!

================

   BREAKING NEWS!

================


AFTER 42 YEARS OF A CONSTANT STRUGGLE BETWEEN REALITY AND MYTH; FACT V.
FICTION, GREED V. TRUTH, THE SMITHSONIAN FINALLY DROPPED IT`S ASININE
RELIGION. AFTER HEARING THAT MAN IS OLDER THAN COAL, AND THE SMITHSONIAN
IS NOTHING BUT A SCAM TO SILENCE THE TRUTH.


SMITHSONIAN SPOKESMAN RICHARD DAWKINS HAD THIS TO SAY, WHILE FILING FOR
BANKRUPTCY:

Dammit. I never thought this will happen. Burn the books everybody.


THRINAXODON HAS RECENTLY FILED A LAWSUIT AGAINST THE SMITHSONIAN FOR
YEARS OF SUPPRESSION OF VALID RESEARCH.


RICHARD LEAKEY IS BURSTING IN TEARS AS ALL HIS "SPECIMENS" ARE TURNING
INTO RUBBLE. HE SAID, "This brings me great money!!!"


Donate to Thrinaxodon via email at biol    gmail com
===================================
BASTARDS THAT WENT BANKRUPT:


    Anthropological Association of Ireland (AAI)
    Anthropology Southern Africa (ASnA)
    Association of Social Anthropologists UK & Commonwealth (ASA)
    European Association of Social Anthropologists (EASA)
    International Association for Southeast European Anthropology (InASEA)
    International Society for Ethnology and Folklore / Société
Internationale d´Ethnologie et de Folklore (SIEF)
    International Union of Anthropological and Ethnological Sciences
(IUAES)
    Latin American Association / Asociación Latinoamericana de
Antropología (ALA)
    Pan African Anthropology Association (PAAA)
    Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research

Members: National associations

    ArgentinaArgentina (Colegio de Graduados en Antropología de la
República Argentina - CGA)
    Australia Australia (Australian Anthopological Society - AAS)
    BrazilBrazil (Associaçõ Brasileira de Antropologia - ABA)
    CanadaCanada (Canadian Anthropology Society / Société canadienne
anthropologie - CASCA)
    Czech RepublicCzech Republic (Czech Association for Social
Anthropology - CASA)
    ChileChile (Colegio de Antropólogos de Chile – CAC)
    FinlandFinland (Finnish Anthropological Society - SAS)
    FranceFrance (Association Française d’Ethnologie et d’Anthropologie
- AFEA)
    France France (Association Française des Anthropologues - AFA)
    France France (Association pour la Recherche en Anthropologie
Sociale - APRAS)
    GermanyGermany (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Völkerkunde - DGV)
    Hong KongHong Kong (Hong Kong Anthropological Society - HKAS)
    India India (Indian Anthropological Association - IAA)
    IndiaIndia (Indian Anthropological Society, Calcutta)
    IsraelIsrael (Israeli Anthropological Association - IAA)
    ItalyItaly (Istituto Italiano di Antropologia - ISItA)
    Japan Japan (Japanese Society of Cultural Anthropology - JASCA)
    LatviaLatvia (Latvijas Antropologu Biedriba - LAB)
    Mexico Mexico (Colegio de Etnólogos y Antropólogos Sociales - CEAS)
    New ZealandNew Zealand (Association of Social Anthropologists of
New Zealand/Aoteroa - ASA-NZ)
    NorwayNorway (Norsk Antropologisk Forening - NAF)
    phillipinesPhilippines (Anthropological Association of the
Philippines / Ugnayang Pang-Aghamtao, Inc - UGAT)
    Poland Poland (Polskie Towarszystwo Ludoznawcze / Polish
Ethnological Society - PTL)
    Portugal Portugal (Associaçõ Portuguesa de Antropologia - APA)
    Russia Russia (Russian Association of Anthropologists and
Ethnologists - RAEE)
    CataloniaSpain (Catalania) (Institut Catalá d'Antropologia - ICA)
    SpainSpain (Asociación de Antropología de Castilla y León - AAC-LMK)
    SwedenSweden (Anthropological Association of Sweden - SANT)
    TaiwanTaiwan (Taiwan Society for Anthropology and Ethnology - TSAE)
    TunisiaTunisia (Tunisian Association of Anthropology /
L’Association Tunisienne d’Anthropologie - TAA)
    UKUK (Royal Anthropological Institute - RAI)
    USUSA (American Anthropological Association – AAA)
===========================================
EVIDENCE THAT HUMANS LIVED IN THE DEVONIAN:

https://groups.google.com/group....7af24f#

https://groups.google.com/group....fb0b82#

====================================

http://thrinaxodon.wordpress.com/....ess.com

===================================

THRINAXODON ONLY HAD THIS TO SAY:

"I..I...I...Can't believe it. This completely disproved Darwinian
orthodoxy."

===================================

THE BASTARDS AT THE SMITHSONIAN, AND THE LEAKEY FOUNDATION ARE ERODING
WITH FEAR.

===================================

THRINAXODON IS NOW ON TWITTER.

Date: 2014/01/10 07:06:08, Link
Author: Thrinaxodon
Quote (KevinB @ Jan. 10 2014,06:54)
I really don't believe that Thrinaxodon is on twitter.

He simply wouldn't fit into 140 characters.

You really want to know:

https://twitter.com/Biolord....olord92

Date: 2014/01/10 07:07:57, Link
Author: Thrinaxodon
THRINAXODON HAS JUST FOUND 3,000 HUMAN REMAINS IN THE DEVONIAN STRATA
IN GREENLAND.



*************************************
MORE AFTER THIS IMPORTANT MESSAGE:
ATHEISTS WILL BURN IN HELL!!!
*************************************



HE APPEARED ON
LOPEZ TONIGHT TO ANNOUNCE THE DISCOVERY.

THRINAXODON ONLY HAD THIS TO SAY:

"I..I...I...Can't believe it. This completely disproved Darwinian
orthodoxy."

================================

EVIDENCE THAT HUMANS LIVED IN THE DEVONIAN:

https://groups.google.com/group....7af24f#

https://groups.google.com/group....fb0b82#

====================================

http://thrinaxodon.wordpress.com/....ess.com

===================================

THRINAXODON ONLY HAD THIS TO SAY:

"I..I...I...Can't believe it. This completely disproved Darwinian
orthodoxy."

===================================

THE BASTARDS AT THE SMITHSONIAN, AND THE LEAKEY FOUNDATION ARE ERODING
WITH FEAR.

===========================
THESE ASSHOLES ARE GOING TO DIE:
THOMAS AQUINAS;
ALDOUS HUXLEY;
BOB CASANVOVA;
SkyEyes;
DAVID IAIN GRIEG;
MARK ISAAK;
JOHN HARSHAM;
RICHARD NORMAN;
DR. DOOLITTLE;
CHARLES DARWIN;
MARK HORTON;
ERIK SIMPSON;
HYPATIAB7;
PAUL J. GANS;
JILLERY;
WIKI TRIK;
THRINAXODON;
PETER NYIKOS;
RON OKIMOTO;
JOHN S. WILKINS
===========================

THRINAXODON WAS SCOURING ANOTHER DEVONIAN FOSSIL BED, AND FOUND A
HUMAN SKULL, AND A HUMAN FEMUR. HE ANALYSED THE FINDS, AND SAW THAT
THEY WERE NOT NORMAL ROCKS. THESE WERE FOSSILIZED BONES. THEY EVEN HAD
TOOTH MARKS ON THEM. SO, THRINAXODON BROUGHT THEM TO THE LEAKEY
FOUNDATION, THEY UTTERLY DISMISSED IT, AND SAID, "We want to keep
people thinking that humans evolved 2 Ma." THRINAXODON BROUGHT HIS
SWORD, AND SAID, "SCIENCE CORRECTS ITSELF." RICHARD LEAKEY SAID, "That
is a myth, for people to believe in science." THRINAXODON PLANS TO
BRING DOOM TO SCIENCE, ITSELF.

============================

THRINAXODON IS NOW ON TWITTER.

Date: 2014/01/10 20:05:14, Link
Author: Thrinaxodon
>
http://creationwiki.org/....iki.org
>
DAVID IAIN GREIG'S HATE GROUP http://talkorigins.org/....ins.org NOW ON FIRE.
>
MAN AS OLD AS FROGS
>
http://thrinaxodon.wordpress.com/faq....faq
>
THRINAXODON IS NOW ON FACEBOOK

Date: 2014/01/10 20:08:56, Link
Author: Thrinaxodon
===============
>BREAKING NEWS!
===============
APROXIMATELLY 300 PEOPLE HAVE BEEN SCAMMED BY THE SMITHSONIAN INTO
THINKING THERE'S NO God. THE Smithsonian BASTARDS have been encroaching
on our land, taking money FROM INNOCENT PEOPLE.

>
They've scammed people into donating for 'research' on human evolution.
In REALITY, IT'S JUST FOR THE ELITISTS TO GET THEIR HANDS ON MORE MONEY.
Please people, stop "donating" to the Shitsonian. It's just A GOD DAMNED
SCAM.
>
========================
>
MAN AS OLD AS FROGS
>
TO FIND OUT HOW; VISIT:
>
http://thrinaxodon.wordpress.com/faq....faq
>

--
Thrinaxodon, The Ultimate Defender of USENET

Date: 2014/01/10 21:29:14, Link
Author: Thrinaxodon
Quote (jeffox @ Jan. 10 2014,12:28)
Quote
Man you just can't buy good acid like that any more.


Dang, I missed that stuff . . . . Still the people that had some of it sure enjoyed it!  However, they came down after a few days, unlike the Thrimaxicallit here.  There's some serious delusion in this one . . . .

Or is he a bot?  Anybody else kinda think so?

You claim I`m a bot, my track record of trolling goes back to the bowls of t.o., May 16, 2013. Before that I was completely fine, these are the very words of Harshman himself:

Quote
Thrinaxodon is an odd sort who has appeared previously in sci.bio.paleontology and talk.origins. He has two personalities, one a fairly knowledeable and reasonable discussant of paleontology and the other the wacko Ed wannabe you see here. (Or will until he’s banished, which I expect soon.) I can’t explain the reason for this second personality.


Source: http://pandasthumb.org/archive....on.html First page of comments.

Date: 2014/01/11 05:04:13, Link
Author: Thrinaxodon
What Americans Want:

Date: 2014/01/11 05:05:02, Link
Author: Thrinaxodon
What Americans want:

Date: 2014/01/11 08:29:12, Link
Author: Thrinaxodon
Quote (midwifetoad @ Jan. 11 2014,06:53)
Little blue squares?

No, this:

Date: 2014/01/16 07:43:00, Link
Author: Thrinaxodon
Quote (Starbuck @ Jan. 13 2014,16:34)

Hey, fatass!:

===============
>BREAKING NEWS!
===============
>
Thrinaxodon was killed in a car accident just a few weeks ago, while engaging in a battle against the Nyikos Armed Forces. Dawkins, hearing this, went to Thrinaxodon's grave and SPIT ON IT. FULL BLOWN, SPIT. The saliva went through Thrinaxodon's tomb, and he smelled the spit, and jumped up from the grave.
>
Dawkins took out his knife and stabbed Thrinaxodon's arm, Thrinaxodon ripped it out and took out his pistol. Dawkins was quick to run, Thrinaxodon yelling, "GOLLY, THIS POOR BASTARD IS ABOUT TO GET AN ASS WHOOPIN'." Dawkins yelled to a man, with his dagger pulled out, "Give me yo' money, and get the hell out of the car." And the man said, "You're Richard Dawkins, famous Oxford professor." Dawkins said, "SHUT THE FUCK UP, GIVE ME YO' MONEY AND GET OUT OF THE CAR!"
>
Dawkins drove, only for Thrinaxodon to catch up and shoot Dawkin's wheels. Dawkins stabbed Thrinaxodon, and Thrinaxodon shot him in the face. Dawkins, with blood gushing from his face, drove off the mountain cliff, and threw a nuclear bomb at Thrinaxodon. Thrinaxodon dodged and shot Dawkins dead.
>
Dawkins then got up and dared to call Hamas. Thrinaxodon then burned his phone, and threw him by the roadside and shot him 17 times. Millions were cheering as Dawkins head was put on display at the Holy See.
>
==========================
THESE BASTARDS WILL DIE:

RICHARD DAWKINS:

RICHARD LEAKEY:

ED CONRAD:

ALDOUS HUXLEY;
BOB CASANVOVA;
SkyEyes;
DAVID IAIN GRIEG;
MARK ISAAK;
JOHN HARSHAM;
RICHARD NORMAN;
DR. DOOLITTLE;
CHARLES DARWIN;
MARK HORTON;
ERIK SIMPSON;
HYPATIAB7;
PAUL J. GANS;
JILLERY;
WIKI TRIK;
THRINAXODON;
PETER NYIKOS;
RON OKIMOTO;
JOHN S. WILKINS
===========================

THRINAXODON WAS SCOURING ANOTHER DEVONIAN FOSSIL BED, AND FOUND A
HUMAN SKULL, AND A HUMAN FEMUR. HE ANALYSED THE FINDS, AND SAW THAT
THEY WERE NOT NORMAL ROCKS. THESE WERE FOSSILIZED BONES. THEY EVEN HAD
TOOTH MARKS ON THEM. SO, THRINAXODON BROUGHT THEM TO THE LEAKEY
FOUNDATION, THEY UTTERLY DISMISSED IT, AND SAID, "We want to keep
people thinking that humans evolved 2 Ma." THRINAXODON BROUGHT HIS
SWORD, AND SAID, "SCIENCE CORRECTS ITSELF." RICHARD LEAKEY SAID, "That
is a myth, for people to believe in science." THRINAXODON PLANS TO
BRING DOOM TO SCIENCE, ITSELF.

============================

THRINAXODON IS NOW ON TWITTER.

Date: 2014/01/28 22:00:48, Link
Author: Thrinaxodon
================
>
SMITHSONIAN OFFICALLY DEAD:
https://groups.google.com/forum....I10-rDg
>
================
>
THRINAXODON MADE MILLIONS AFTER DESTROYING THE SMITHSONIAN IN A RAID
CONDUCTED BY THE FBI! THRINAXODON CHEERED WITH JOY AS THE SHITSHONIAN
ASSHOLES WEPPED WITH TEARS AS THRINAXODON'S POCKETS WERE FILLING WITH CASH!
>
Please Dawkins, hear this, "YOUR ASS IS MINE! FUCK YOU! I GOT ALL YOUR
FUCKING, GOD DAMNED DIRTY CASH! YOU DESERVE THIS YOU FUCKER!"
>
============================
>
THRINAXODON WAS AWARDED WITH US$350,000,000! GOD THANK YOU!
>
MILLIONS CHEERED WITH JOY AROUND THE WORLD AS THRINAXODON TORE DOWN
THE SMITHSONIAN WALL (reference to the Berlin Wall).
>
============================
>
THE NEW SMITHSONIAN:
http://cdn.ebaumsworld.com/mediaFi....376.jpg
============================
>
EVIDENCE THAT HUMANS LIVED IN THE DEVONIAN:

https://groups.google.com/group......7af24f#

https://groups.google.com/group......fb0b82#
>
===================================
THRINAXODON NOW ON TWITTER.

Date: 2014/01/28 22:08:56, Link
Author: Thrinaxodon
If anyone thinks I`m just a Poe, here's an article from nature that proves my science:

https://groups.google.com/forum....Rpx68k8

Date: 2014/02/26 12:41:09, Link
Author: Thrinaxodon
=================
> BREAKING NEWS!!!
=================
>
THRINAXODON FOUND 300 FOSSILS FROM DEVONIAN STRATA FROM GREENLAND LAST TUESDAY, ONE WAS A COMPLETE HUMAN PELVIS!
>
THRINAXODON ALSO FOUND 6 PRIMITIVE STONE TOOLS FROM THE SITE, AS WELL AS CHARCOAL!
>
PETER NYIKOS WAS FORCED TO ACCEPT THAT HUMANS HAVE ORIGINS IN THE DEVONIAN AND HUMAN EVOLUTION IS A SCAM.
>
THE SMITHSONIAN IS GOING NUTS OVER THIS FIND, I WILL HAVE TO PATENT IT BEFORE ANYONE ELSE!
>
SEE YA FUCKERS!
============================
EVIDENCE THAT HUMANS LIVED IN THE DEVONIAN:

https://groups.google.com/group....7af24f#

https://groups.google.com/group....fb0b82#

====================================

http://thrinaxodon.wordpress.com/....ess.com

===================================

THRINAXODON ONLY HAD THIS TO SAY:

"I..I...I...Can't believe it. This completely disproved Darwinian
orthodoxy."

===================================

THE BASTARDS AT THE SMITHSONIAN, AND THE LEAKEY FOUNDATION ARE ERODING
WITH FEAR.

===========================
THESE ASSHOLES ARE GOING TO DIE:
THOMAS AQUINAS;
ALDOUS HUXLEY;
BOB CASANVOVA;
SkyEyes;
DAVID IAIN GRIEG;
MARK ISAAK;
JOHN HARSHAM;
RICHARD NORMAN;
DR. DOOLITTLE;
CHARLES DARWIN;
MARK HORTON;
ERIK SIMPSON;
HYPATIAB7;
PAUL J. GANS;
JILLERY;
WIKI TRIK;
THRINAXODON;
PETER NYIKOS;
RON OKIMOTO;
JOHN S. WILKINS
===========================

THRINAXODON WAS SCOURING ANOTHER DEVONIAN FOSSIL BED, AND FOUND A
HUMAN SKULL, AND A HUMAN FEMUR. HE ANALYSED THE FINDS, AND SAW THAT
THEY WERE NOT NORMAL ROCKS. THESE WERE FOSSILIZED BONES. THEY EVEN HAD
TOOTH MARKS ON THEM. SO, THRINAXODON BROUGHT THEM TO THE LEAKEY
FOUNDATION, THEY UTTERLY DISMISSED IT, AND SAID, "We want to keep
people thinking that humans evolved 2 Ma." THRINAXODON BROUGHT HIS
SWORD, AND SAID, "SCIENCE CORRECTS ITSELF." RICHARD LEAKEY SAID, "That
is a myth, for people to believe in science." THRINAXODON PLANS TO
BRING DOOM TO SCIENCE, ITSELF.

============================

THRINAXODON IS NOW ON TWITTER

 

 

 

=====