form_srcid: Bing
form_cmd: view_author
Your IP address is 38.107.191.96
View Author detected.
view author posts:
Retrieve source record and display it.
form_author:
form_srcid: Bing
q: SELECT AUTHOR, MEMBER_NAME, IP_ADDR, POST_DATE, TOPIC_ID, t1.FORUM_ID, POST, POST_ID, FORUM_VIEW_THREADS from ib_forum_posts AS t1 LEFT JOIN (ib_member_profiles AS t2, ib_forum_info AS t3) ON (t1.forum_id = t3.forum_id AND t1.author = t2.member_id) WHERE MEMBER_NAME like 'Bing%' and forum_view_threads LIKE '*' ORDER BY POST_DATE ASC
DB_err:
DB_result: Resource id #4
| Date: 2006/05/21 05:00:21, Link 65.95.177.165 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
AFDave's hopelessly stuck in that "And God hath given Dominion over all living things to Man" meme. |
| Date: 2006/05/21 06:21:59, Link 65.95.177.165 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
Chick tracts are written in English, so the answer is presumably 'yes'. |
| Date: 2006/05/21 07:26:26, Link 65.95.177.165 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
I like Apes, Lies and Mrs. Henn too! |
| Date: 2006/05/22 04:22:06, Link 65.95.177.165 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
He couldn't have found a wing-nut even if you loaned him the mirror. |
| Date: 2006/05/24 06:44:14, Link 65.95.177.165 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
There's the admission folks, in his own words. Not a single word of this was about science. There is nothing you can prove to him, nothing that will change his mind. He's here ... because on the social and government scene it is critical to correctly define human beings as what they truthfully are: Creations of the Creator God, made in the image of God, and placed in a position of dominion over all of nature. 'nuff said. Ban him now. |
| Date: 2006/05/24 08:35:59, Link 65.95.177.165 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
So this place is providing selection pressure for AFDave. His argument evolves. We're effectively a half-used bottle of antibiotic against his infection of kid's minds. Not enough to kill it, only enough to develop a stronger resistance. |
| Date: 2006/05/26 02:05:44, Link 65.95.177.165 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
I fear a great many more will complete their home-schooling and go on to academic careers at Patrick Henry College and then into internships with senators and congressmen. |
| Date: 2006/06/06 00:39:40, Link 65.95.163.129 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
Only if G*d does the poll and publishes the results through one of his prophets or on AiG. The folks here are reprobate atheist evolutionists, and as such are not to be listened to as has been amply demonstrated over the past several weeks. |
| Date: 2006/06/17 02:35:13, Link 65.95.163.129 | ||||
| Author: Bing | ||||
Some things are burned in my memory. If it's not failing me, that phrase was first used on The Jeffersons. |
| Date: 2006/06/17 05:36:22, Link 65.95.135.208 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
Not just different looking but really different. As in they cannot breed with each other and produce fertile offspring. |
| Date: 2006/06/20 16:26:50, Link 65.95.178.12 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
DaveTard wrote on the NEA and gay marriage thread
No, everyone knows it's a place to indoctrinate children with the socio-religious cultural mores of a minority of fundy wingnuts. Why oh why can't we atheist moonbat church-burning ebola boys ever get anything correct? |
| Date: 2006/06/21 12:07:28, Link 65.95.178.12 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
How far apart are the continents today? If they began as one super-continent, when did they stop moving apart? Is it 500 years ago? Right around the time that Columbus came over? Wikipedia says the width of the Atlantic is between about 2800 and 4800 kilometers, so let's say the Atlantic has an average width of 3800 km. For North America to drift away from the coast of Africa and form this 3800 km ocean in 4000 years, it would be moving at a rate of almost 1 km every year. That's 1000 meters every year, or about 2 and 3/4 meters every day. That's almost 9 feet each and every day for 4000 years. Do you really believe that the Americas hurtled away from Africa by 9 feet every day for 4000 years and then stopped? What caused it to stop? If this kind of movement of the earth's crust was a normal event, why isn't still going on at this incredible rate? Is it possible for this to happen again? Why weren't there catastropic earthquakes and tsunami every day that the earth was undergoing such a radical transformation? Or did it all happen underwater while the Earth was covered by the flood? The flood hid this radical transformation of the Earth and acted as a shock absorber? That's why there weren't earthquakes. Is that your theory? I've read some whoppers in my days, but this super-continent one of yours, it's the winner. |
| Date: 2006/06/21 14:21:58, Link 65.95.178.12 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
Already done! |
| Date: 2006/07/03 02:01:54, Link 65.95.138.249 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
ummm, Dave? You did notice that was a drawing, a cartoon, right? It doesn't have the same evidentiary weight as a photograph. And another thing, it was made up specifically to fit with the evidence of the Bible. So again, you start with the book, gin up evidence to fit round peg - square hole stylee, and expect us all to go along with this? |
| Date: 2006/07/05 09:25:19, Link 65.95.138.249 | ||||
| Author: Bing | ||||
Then how did it pass from your hypothesized animal carriers and back to humans? You do know that STD's (sexually transmitted disease) are not airborne, or caught from toilet seats or doorknobs, right? Someone has to do the humpy-humpy with the infected individual. Or are you suggesting that Noah's family were into sex with farm animals? |
| Date: 2006/07/18 15:00:08, Link 65.95.128.22 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
We Canadians are a very even minded people. For every  we produce, we have to also offer  just to be fair and balanced. It's in our constitution, really. |
| Date: 2006/07/19 12:15:29, Link 65.95.128.22 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
Waterloo Lutheran became Wilfred Laurier University in 1973. It's not the computer science/engineering powerhouse, that's down the street at the University of Waterloo, but it ranked 10th in Canada for undergrad institutions in 2005 according to a Maclean's magazine survey. Her English degree BA gave her as much science background as Dembski's 2 PhD's. Which is just about none. |
| Date: 2006/07/19 12:25:32, Link 65.95.128.22 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
Yeah, but he's probably got an Elmer Gantry stylee faith healer working on it too. Don't you all know that there's a rising chorus of medical professionals who disagree with the methodological naturalism rife within evidence-based medical community and that we must be careful to teach the controversy? |
| Date: 2006/07/23 06:08:41, Link 65.95.128.22 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
I think you've got this completely bass-ackwards Dave. When one starts with the conclusion that one wants, and then reads the 'evidence' to fit the conclusion while discarding all evidence against the conclusion this is not an example of an open-mind. |
| Date: 2006/07/30 05:10:11, Link 65.95.133.89 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
Close but not quite. His legal training prepared him for a career in criticizing biologists and biology. |
| Date: 2006/08/05 05:37:33, Link 65.95.135.196 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
Oh no, you're not one of those Campagnolo Cultists, are you? 7 TdeF wins in a row was good enough for Lance on Shimano, at the DA/Campy Record level I believe that any performance differences are due to the legs and not the components. |
| Date: 2006/08/23 12:13:21, Link 65.95.137.236 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
I'm assuming by RCC you mean Roman Catholic Church? Given a few of the fundies I have met, I'd be willing to bet that Dave would categorically state that Roman Catholics are not True Christians™ as defined by his church. Rather, they are blasphemers, idolators, Pope-and-Mary worshippers who deny the supremacy of scripture and instead substitute heretical sacraments. Rational or not, given the typical fundy view of RCC they are discounted by their worldview, just like the atheist science conspiracy (ASC). |
| Date: 2006/08/28 10:22:09, Link 65.95.171.227 | ||||
| Author: Bing | ||||
Here AFD, I'll save you the trouble. A quick google of the phrase "how long it takes for a photon to get from the center of the sun to its surface?" lifted directly from the previous post and the first hit is for A162, Lecture 7 from Ohio State University. And the answer they give is as follows:
So there's an answer, 30,000 years. Or 5 total lifetimes of the universe using AFDave's Miraculous BibleMath™. |
| Date: 2006/08/28 11:18:24, Link 65.95.171.227 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
Why will it take a while, has AiG not put up it's photons in the sun page yet? Not a big topic for creationist tracts? |
| Date: 2006/08/29 09:57:22, Link 65.95.171.227 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
That is almost too easy. He mentioned once the name of his Pastor as "Herbster". A quick peek at his Lying to kid's about Jesus page and one sees a Carl Herbster listed as an Advisory Board Member. Then google pastor carl herbster and the first linkie is to a page for Tri-City Ministries, Independence MO. Just a quick question Davie. A number of the google hits allege some financial hanky-panky going on between the blessed pastor and someone in the local banking industry. Has the Herbster forgot that story in the bible about Jesus and his relationship with the money lenders? Or does Jesus say it's OK in today's age if it means the pastor can live in a nice neighborhood? |
| Date: 2006/08/29 12:31:51, Link 65.95.182.216 | ||||||||
| Author: Bing | ||||||||
What an excellent idea Dave, I might just do that. From the pitch.com article about Pastor Carl Herbster "Blessed are the Money Makers":
What exactly do you mean about "your type of publication" though? Are you casting aspersions about me? The neat thing about publications you might not like is that they are extensively fact-checked and vetted by lawyers before publication. Publishers don't want libel suits creeping up, so if the evidence isn't there, it's not published. Nasty thing about that evidence, eh Davie? It doesn't care which church someone goes to, or what worldview they subscribe to. It just is. |
| Date: 2006/08/29 13:06:29, Link 65.95.182.216 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
I respectfully disagree. I think each shows the extent to which Dave is willing to go irrespective of evidence contrary to his deeply held beliefs. Both are a measure of his character. And Davie, we've all made the "Lying for Jesus" comments, now that we know you're Herbster's pilot, do you have a t-shirt that says, "Flying for Jesus"? |
| Date: 2006/09/05 09:08:41, Link 65.95.182.216 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
Yep, I distinctly remember him spouting off about 'scribes' that followed Adam, Eve and family around writing everything down on clay tablets or stone tablets or some such nonsense. When asked about these scribes, tablets and even the tiniest speck of evidence whatsoever supporting his assertion he did what he always does. Ran away and changed the subject when he came back. |
| Date: 2006/09/05 12:21:58, Link 65.95.182.216 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
*bzzzzzzz* I'll take DaveTard rewrites Genesis for 100 Alex. What is "The Jews were wrong, wrong on tradition, wrong about Genesis, wrong about Jesus, just plain wrong". |
| Date: 2006/09/08 08:33:23, Link 65.95.182.216 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
And youse rites even gooder! |
| Date: 2006/09/09 07:49:11, Link 65.95.182.216 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
He doesn't want to be a published scientist, he said so himself. The only evidence he gives any credence to is from AiG or ICR. Forget about Nature and Science, they're hotbeds of radical atheists for which the academic mantra of "publish or perish" becomes "publish then perish in a lake of eternal fire". You'd be better off watching C-SPAN and reading the reports from the courts. The fundies didn't take over the GOP from the ground up just because they believed the initials stand for "God's Own Party". They believed that if they controlled the majority of elected positions from dogcatcher right on up to POTUS and the courts too then they could implement the America is a Christian Nation agenda without interference from the Damned. If the Fundies see their power and influence waning I'd expect a last desperate gasp from them before they're consigned to the dustbin of political influence. |
| Date: 2006/09/13 10:00:42, Link 65.95.139.233 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
Davie, just because these people did the work at some time to earn a PhD it doesn't mean they're automatically correct in all things going forward. Take that moonie cultist Wells for example. Would you believe your family doctor if he abandoned all pretense of working within the practice of the larger medical community? Would you take your kids to a quack and shrug it off because he has a diploma on the wall that says "MD"? There are "doctors" like that Dave, they believe that they alone have the answer, but instead of using accepted techniques like CT and MRI and other diagnostic tests they hook patients up to a bogus galvanic skin response meter and diagnose everything from cancer to the heartbreak of psoriasis. And then they sell the patient some quack remedy that cures nothing. And that is what it's like for your precious few PhD's committed to truth (which I take to mean your version of Biblical Truth). They're quacks, charlatans, frauds and liars. Their big splash on the world scene really amounts to nothing at all. The scientific community knows who the cranks are, and weighs their ideas appropriately. It's the wingnuts in the bleachers like you who think the frauds are accomplishing anything. We can accept that, given your past history of taking AiG references as gospel, while at the same time discarding Nature and Science references as drivel. But really Dave, you make a bigger splash every morning, if you know what I mean. |
| Date: 2006/09/18 08:25:07, Link 65.95.163.239 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
Very nice picture Dave, but let's pick a nit here, shall we? Your cartoon allows 1 day for continental drift. Now various sources give a figure of roughly 3500 miles for the average width of the Atlantic Ocean. Can we do a little basic arithmetic? 3500 miles / 24 hours = 145.8333333 miles/hour. Dave, this is more than 2X the legal speed limit on your nation's highways. Why don't we break this down a little further? 145.8333333333 / 60 minutes = 2.430555555 miles/minute. Reducing this even further we get a value of 213.88889 feet per second! That's 2/3 the length of a football field every second! How much energy does your car require to travel 70 mph? How much energy does it take for your car to travel 145 mph? How much energy would it take for a continent to travel 145 mph through water? Think back to your fluid dynamics classes from first year engineering Dave, come up with a number and get back to us, OK? What would that energy do to the water surrounding it Dave? Do you think the earth would even have cooled down yet, 4300 (alleged) years later? |
| Date: 2006/09/18 15:10:22, Link 65.95.163.239 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
Dave, you said in an earlier post that you believed that there was only 1 super-continent before the flood. And that it broke up during the flood to become the continents we see today. So again, how does 1 continent break up and then all the pieces go whizzing around underwater at 145 mph? How much energy is required to overcome the drag of the water? Here's a little hint I found for you. D = ½ * p * v² * A * C where D is the drag in Newtons, p is the density of the medium (floodwaters), v is velocity, A is the surface area and C is the drag coefficient. You can figure out the velocity Dave, something like 780,000,000 m/s? What's that squared Davie-doodles? Something like 608,400,000,000,000,000? And the surface area? Well, how long is the pacific coastline? Billions of meters? And how deep? How many billions of square meters of surface area? Just how friggin' big does that drag number come out to Dave? How much energy would be required to overcome that number? Enough to boil the planet? |
| Date: 2006/09/27 12:33:05, Link 65.95.136.161 | ||||||
| Author: Bing | ||||||
But it appears his booting didn't stick. See comment #27 22 minutes later.
I predict that this comment will be deleted in its entirety very soon. |
| Date: 2006/09/27 12:50:48, Link 65.95.136.161 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
Maybe they're waiting for it to be miraculously added to the ban list, as some kind of trial by ordeal. If the name goes on the list by some supernatural means, then G*d really wanted him to be banned? |
| Date: 2006/09/27 14:48:48, Link 65.95.136.161 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
It could be, just for argument's sake. But I recall something from Dembski about banning being the logos of John's gospel in the idiom of booting theory. So even if he invokes powerful space aliens or time travellers from our future it's all just "nudge-nudge wink-wink say-no-more it's G*d". The sacrament of booting is more akin to an exorcism. |
| Date: 2006/09/28 13:34:54, Link 65.95.136.161 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
I agree with this. On another board I frequent the software automatically adds a small phrase at the bottom of an edited post identifying who made the edit and when it was done. Steve edited one of my earlier posts to make it less gross and I thought I was descending further into dementia because I was sure of the words I had typed, yet what appeared on the screen was different. Is this an easy feature to turn on in Ikonboard Wes? |
| Date: 2006/10/01 07:48:32, Link 65.95.136.161 |
| Author: Bing |
| deleted because I didn't read far enough down the thread. |
| Date: 2006/10/01 13:11:19, Link 65.95.136.161 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
So it's not about:
|
| Date: 2006/10/07 02:19:40, Link 65.95.133.192 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
Well, there you go. You have both and undergrad and graduate degrees and professional experience in the relevant field. Obviously you have no justfication for claiming any knowledge in the area. OTOH DaveScot has sergeant's stripes from the USMC. Because he's an autodidact (he's had a Scientific American subscription for more than 30 years) polymath (he told us) with an IQ above 150 (again, self-identified) based on extrapolation from his SAT scores then his stripes trump your academic hoods and actual experience any day. In his ID world theology degrees confer expertise in biology, USMC rank tops IEEE membership and all that is really necessary is a fawning devotion to his Most Worshipful Master Dembski. |
| Date: 2006/10/09 09:26:26, Link 65.95.133.192 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
|
| Date: 2006/10/16 12:57:27, Link 65.95.133.192 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
He didn't have to, Noah and his sons were shoveling mountains of E. coli over the side. Therefore E. coli must be one of the original "created kinds" taken on the Ark as passengers of the passengers. |
| Date: 2006/10/20 15:43:02, Link 65.95.133.192 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
See, this is the part that I don't get. If Eve was made from Adam's rib (side?) then isn't she effectively a clone of Adam, with G*d using Adam's genetic material taken from muscle or bone to whip her up in His supernatural petrie dish? Obviously He would have had to do some manipulation to eliminate that pesky 'Y' and double up on the 'X' to make things work for gender but wouldn't the DNA taken from mature somatic cells be pretty uniform? No messy meiosis scrambling things up? |
| Date: 2006/10/21 02:05:37, Link 65.95.133.192 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
I was going to say that Dave is the only example of polyploidy here, but that would be insulting to people with trisomy 21 |
| Date: 2006/11/15 16:59:23, Link 65.95.133.111 |
| Author: Bing |
|
Who called Dave? This could be fun. Oooh, my turn to guess! I'm guessing that "Dr." Dino, Kent Hovind himself, called Dave. I'm willing to go further and predict that "Dr." Dino offered Dave his own "Ph.D" in Creationist Science from Dino Adventure Land University for only $9999 (in small denomination, unsequential unmarked bills only, mustn't go over $10K and alert the authorities). In addition "Dr." Dino offered unrestricted performance rights of Kent's schtick while he's away on federal vacation subject to a small royalty. Said royalty payable in cartons of cigarettes on visiting day. |
| Date: 2006/11/18 20:28:03, Link 65.95.133.111 | ||||||
| Author: Bing | ||||||
So what you're saying is that good ol' Ken has never read Matthew 21:12-13?
Den of thieves, eh? Must be, running a $14M a year business that masquerades as a church. |
| Date: 2006/11/19 14:41:44, Link 65.95.161.246 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
On the Larry Moran thread we find this gem:
But ID is all about the science, nothing about religion, no siree! ID is not in any way the repackaged creationism taken from bible thumpers past, even if some activist judge says so. So there's absolutely no reason at all to mention someone's religiousity or lack thereof. Move along folks, nothing to see here. |
| Date: 2006/12/01 19:42:04, Link 65.95.129.55 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
You mean there's another Backwater Christian Clown College even lower on the totem pole than the one he's at now? |
| Date: 2006/12/02 13:18:53, Link 65.95.129.55 | ||||
| Author: Bing | ||||
There's the problem Dave. It's not important what scientists really believe, it's what explanation they accept for a natural occurrence that's best explained by the evidence presented today. Maybe tomorrow another scientist will present evidence that turns things completely upside-down, that's always a possibility. But the practice of science marches on. On the other hand you have your magic book, literal, inerrant, unchanging since it was dictated by G*d Almighty. You believe, evidence not required. This entire thread is a monument to your Kurt Wise moment.
That you have so little imagination is not our problem. |
| Date: 2006/12/02 14:44:27, Link 65.95.129.55 | ||||||
| Author: Bing | ||||||
Where did I ever say that creationists were dumb? Find me the explicit quote. But why don't you go ahead and read what Wise wrote about his decision.
Did you get that Dave? He rejected all the evidence that would ever counter the WoG. He chose to use the bible-filter to eliminate contrary evidence.
|
| Date: 2006/12/10 07:34:30, Link 65.95.129.55 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
Well, we have ample evidence in this thread of the soft spots they all have in their heads. I would guess that they also have soft spots in their trousers that no amount of Viagra could overcome. Why shouldn't they also have soft spots in their hearts (which, BTW, is so complex it is impossible to have arisen by chance so it must be designed! Praise be to G*d) |
| Date: 2006/12/16 15:55:46, Link 65.95.129.55 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
I was eating vindaloo and dupiaza last night and drinking many Double Diamonds. There was a very bad smell this morning and I thought I was going to die. I think I just presented more evidence than Davie has in both threads! |
| Date: 2006/12/21 17:45:54, Link 65.95.137.215 |
| Author: Bing |
| I'm currently living in a small town outside of London, ON, Canada and alum of UWO. Go Stangs! |
| Date: 2006/12/26 09:22:47, Link 65.95.137.215 |
| Author: Bing |
|
Has anyone else notice that the young Master Maggy has only posted once on this thread to announce his arrival, and that the rest of the posts are by the usual suspects? Given his websites are chock full of the typical creationist boilerplate I must ask why we're repeating this exercise? That he's an award winner from AiG only secures his bona fides. There's more than enough evidence out there to destroy the literalist's Creation Myth Confirmed by Science hypothesis. How many times must we re-invent the wheel? We already have our one intractable fundagelical wingnut, do we really need another? And will AFDave get jealous when he sees he's been replaced with a younger model? |
| Date: 2006/12/27 11:07:22, Link 65.95.137.215 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
1)evidence please? And not from the bibble either. Current evidence from tribal populations living in primitive pre-literate conditions suggests that living into one's 40s is extraordinary. 2)Who cares, it still means that women had to have lots of kids? 3)Again, evidence please. Use your head Dave. Do some math. Babies mean a 9 month gestation, and then after that there's some ovulation suppression from nursing. Assume that each baby takes about a year from the ol' humpa-humpa until it's out and suckling at the teat. Even allowing some twins in that 56, are you really expecting us to believe that women gave birth year-in and year-out for a period of 30 or 40 years? Assuming further that maternal age at first birth is around 15 or so, you're saying that women had serial pregnancies well into their 50s? What about menopause Dave? Did women not go through menopause until much later either, because of the miraculous effects of their pre-flood perfection? I have some friends who come from large families. With 11 brothers and sisters, the mothers look positively burned up. Did the men take many wives to have those 50 children, like the fundy mormons do? I also want to know how this explosive population growth was sustained. If you plant in the spring, and then harvest in the fall, how could eight people have planted enough to sustain their exponentially growing families? |
| Date: 2006/12/27 20:52:59, Link 65.95.137.215 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
Maybe we've only got a Ham prodigy or possibly a Hovind Savant. Q: How do you know when you've found a Hovind Savant? A: He's in jail for tax fraud while he's still in his 20s. |
| Date: 2006/12/31 11:21:07, Link 65.95.137.215 | ||||
| Author: Bing | ||||
So if we did, it'd be some kind of record? What do you say folks? Shall we abandon DavieDiddle to his AiG fueled dementia and carry on in the other threads? He's said repeatedly that he's real deal, the intractable YEC. Let's make this his Kurt Wise moment;
Let's help him stand with Kurt. But let's leave him alone to do it. |
| Date: 2006/12/31 12:57:09, Link 65.95.137.215 |
| Author: Bing |
| Just as long as he's not #5000. I'd hate to give him the ability to crow elsewhere that he's had the last word and single-handedly defeated the Evil Atheist Horde™ |
| Date: 2006/12/31 17:04:53, Link 65.95.137.215 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
Davie-diddles, at the point where your thread is shut down there will be more than 11,000 posts! A good portion are yours. The thing is, it was your obligation to offer positive evidence for your hypothesis. What you've done instead is post wingnutty objections to evolution, quotemines, handwaving and plain old sh1t that you or your AiG mentors just made up. This does not constitute positive evidence at all. You've proved absolutely resistant to any measure of learning whatsoever that in some cases even my 9 year old understands. But like everything else you bemoan the lack of "tolerance". 8 months and 11000 posts later and you whine about tolerance? Doesn't this strike you as ridiculous? You had your opportunity, you fumbled it and now it's time to move along. There is no Creation/Evolution controversy, except in the fevered imagination of religious fundamentalists who insist on a literal reading of Genesis. And you are the poster child. |
| Date: 2007/01/02 18:29:56, Link 65.95.137.215 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
Newton died in 1727. Darwin published OOS in 1859. 1859-1727=132. Do you think the fact that he was dead for 132 years might have compromised his ability to do research? Offering Newton as an authority and creationist is just as useful as saying he didn't support man's ability to build machines capable of heavier-than-air flight because he died before Wilber and Orville did their thing 176 years later. |
| Date: 2007/01/06 11:18:21, Link 65.95.137.215 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
Dave you are an unrepentant wingnut! As I already pointed out to your friend the Rev. Pastor Dog'sBollocks, Newton died 132 years before Darwin published OOS. So unless he was possessed of some special powers that allowed him to continue to do research after he was buried in Westminster Abbey and his brain became worm food, your appeal to Newton's authority is a non-starter. By the same notion you could argue that Newton would also be against heavier-than-air-flight, (because he was dead 176 years before the Wright's flew at Kitty Hawk in 1903), the telephone (patented by Bell 149 years after Newton's death). |
| Date: 2007/01/06 19:27:59, Link 65.95.137.215 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
You still don't get it, do you? Newton died 132 years before Darwin published OOS. You on the other hand are alive 148 years after it's publication. There is 280 years of accumulated scientific achievement between Newton's death and today. You have the world's libraries at your fingertips because of the medium we're using now. You've had experts in various fields explain to you why your "evidence" doesn't hold up, but you blithely dismissed it as a difference in viewpoints. You had more than enough opportunity to present evidence for your hypothesis, yet all you managed to offer was misdirection and trumped up claims against evolution taken from sources who proudly proclaim something along the lines of "if observation contradicts the bible, then observation is wrong." You don't get what that means? I have more respect for your friend with the unpronounceable handle. At least he admits his blinders up front. He didn't dissemble, quotemine, or c&p bullsh1te from AiG to help his case. It's not viewpoint discrimination Dave, you're just wrong plain and simple. You have access to knowledge that Newton never had. He was an advanced mind for his time. But things that were unthinkable to all but a genius almost 300 years ago are commonplace today. I could never have invented the Calculus, but I did learn some of it in high school. You have heard the phrase "on the shoulders of giants", eh Davie? Do you think he would have done what you've done these past 8 months, the 'net equivalent of sticking your fingers in your yelling la-la-la, I can't hear you!? That's your tarpit Dave, you discount all the work of those giants because it contradicts your image of your parochial little god. |
| Date: 2007/01/07 11:45:29, Link 65.95.139.101 | ||||||
| Author: Bing | ||||||
Dave, once and for all, you are not Galileo. You do not have a tarpit mind because you hold a minority viewpoint, you have a tarpit because your biblical literalism has disabled you from learning or acknowledging anything that would contradict it. I'm rather surprised you're not a flat earther too. From Wikipedia:
Do you understand yet Dave? Perhaps the most telling difference between you and Galileo is that he fomented the rejection of blind allegiance to authority, both philosophical and religious, in matters of science. This helped lead to the separation of science from both philosophy and religion, a major justification for his description as the "father of science" Read it a couple times if you have to, I know you're going to have trouble with that rejection of blind allegiance to authority, both philosophical and religious, in matters of science. But let that sink in a bit. One more time, just in case you missed it. rejection of blind allegiance to authority, both philosophical and religious, in matters of science. This helped lead to the separation of science from both philosophy and religion In all the time you've been here, you've been about nothing but blind allegiance to authority, especially religious. It's coloured every single post you've written. You tried to cover it up with faux science, but your religious sources, your appeals to authority, your insistence on making the genesis myth fit within the accepted observation of centuries of science is so opposite to Galileo's experience that you couldn't be more wrong about yourself. He provided evidence, you have provided none. You sir, are the anti-Galileo. |
| Date: 2007/01/14 14:02:17, Link 65.95.139.101 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
Try this one You had an extra . after the .htm in the filename and that just won't work. |
| Date: 2007/02/04 12:25:08, Link 65.95.167.211 |
| Author: Bing |
|
Is DaveTard now taking the opportunity of his premature Dell retirement to pursue a career in medicine? With the IQ certified at 150+ from 20 year old SAT scores and his vast science knowledge gleaned from 30 years of reading Scientific American I bet he could skip the MCAT, skip med school, and just go on to ace the national boards and put the letters FACS right after his name. |
| Date: 2007/02/04 14:17:52, Link 65.95.167.211 | ||||
| Author: Bing | ||||
|
| Date: 2007/02/05 14:09:38, Link 65.95.167.211 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
Oh c'mon, this one should be easy to predict. The "Designer" and engineers of the Spaceship Dumbskass didn't have to match the pathetic level of detail that the evil materialist starship constructors had to. So they had a G*d-bothering graphics designer do all the control panels for weapons and propulsion systems. While it looked great, it was entirely non-functional. And when Commodore WAD tried to fire on the fleet from the United Federation of Darwinists it just made a *fizzle-pop* sound. The Commodore and his intrepid crew just barely escaped in a ICpod to begin their 10-20 year trek back to the home planet to regroup before the next attack is launched by their successors. |
| Date: 2007/02/16 13:23:42, Link 65.95.186.166 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
Sung in a falsetto: (with apologies to Neil Young) My my, hey hey The DaveTard is here to stay It's better to burn out than to fade away My my, hey hey ... Hey hey, my my DaveScot Tard can never die There's less to the picture Than meets the eye Hey hey, my my |
| Date: 2007/02/18 07:39:04, Link 65.95.186.166 | ||||
| Author: Bing | ||||
greenskeepers It's better if you watch the video. |
| Date: 2007/02/18 07:51:41, Link 65.95.186.166 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
I've run into quite a few on teh intarwebs that are really Caspar Q. Milquetoaste in life. Must be something about being able to create an online personna, if you want to be a 150++ IQ superhero autodidact with the entirety of your SciAm subscription committed to your memory palace, then that's fine. Especially if you're a cheezy-poof glutton in a stained t-shirt. |
| Date: 2007/02/22 12:10:32, Link 65.95.186.166 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
I read this and then the damnedest thing popped into my head. And now I must inflict it on all of you Tommy TuTone and Jenny (867-5309) |
| Date: 2007/02/24 05:58:49, Link 65.95.180.121 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
They say "tabernac" much more frequently. I would suggest it be used like this: Tabernac!! It's that wingnut fundy AFDave again! |
| Date: 2007/02/24 16:45:48, Link 65.95.180.121 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
That's where you and I differ. I had one coming to my door every Saturday for weeks on end. He seemed like a nice old geezer but polite requests to leave me alone and not knock on my door were ignored. So finally fed up, I invited him in. When I asked him to light the candles in the points of the pentagram that I had painted on the basement floor while I went and got the chicken he took off like a scalded cat. And the next week I saw him cross the street as he walked up the sidewalk. Guess I musta scared him or something? |
| Date: 2007/02/27 19:52:36, Link 65.95.180.121 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
Despite all his Dellmillions, I can guess who it wasn't. |
| Date: 2007/03/13 15:43:30, Link 65.95.165.244 |
| Author: Bing |
|
I was listening to The Current on CBC Radio this morning and I caught this segment. I thought you folks might like to hear it for yourselves. Turkey – Creationism Documentary Scroll down to The Current: Part 2 for a description of the piece and click on the linky to listen to the program in RealPlayer. |
| Date: 2007/04/14 13:40:04, Link 65.95.138.148 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
Wasn't that the drummer's name in Hedwig and the Angry Inch? |
| Date: 2007/04/19 14:50:50, Link 65.95.138.148 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
Hey now, is that fair? I mean the guy's a cough-cough respected faculty member at a third-tier Baptist seminary. There's probably some kind of rule about him going into a liquor store to buy the stuff. If he can't buy, he can't pay? I wouldn't be too sure if he didn't have to sign something to that effect either, along with his Statement of Faith and acknowledgement of Biblical Inerrancy to take the job. He probably can't f*ck his wife standing up either, because that might lead to dancing. |
| Date: 2007/04/20 13:34:57, Link 65.95.138.148 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
Yes, they do, well in a kinda-sorta way. I took Psy153(Psychology of Human Sexual Behaviour) at Western with Bill Fisher back in the day. Some of my friends referred to it as F*ckSci. We only got movie night once during the semester and we had to watch a movie about a couple of 70 year-olds getting it on. All the moves seemed the same, only slower. I'm guessing she wanted to go go Liberty, but didn't meet the admission requirements, so she had to settle for Patriot like Kent Hovind.  |
| Date: 2007/04/22 08:10:03, Link 65.95.138.148 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
Flipping sliders in the enlisted's mess does not count. Say again, "Do you want fries with that Petty Officer?" Takes you back, doesn't it? |
| Date: 2007/04/23 18:02:08, Link 65.95.138.210 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
I'm currently partial to a wee dram of Poit Dhubh, 30yo. It's rather outrageously priced, but it's my only vice. I agree on The Balvenie, it's lovely. A friend wanted to clean out his whisky cupboard and held a party he called "The Culling o' the Herd." He had 19 different bottles, all in various stages of consumption. Hired a piper, we all wore our kilts, ate haggis, it was big fun. We killed 12. The guest of honor at the party was the reason he needed to cull the herd. It was a Highland Park 25yo. (A trivial note aside, my wife recently sold one of our whippet puppies to a fellow who's father was a master cooper at Highland Park. Family legend has it that Da' was given a case of HP 50 yo as a retirement gift. Oh what I wouldn't give for a nip of that!) Sláinte mhath! |
| Date: 2007/04/25 17:55:12, Link 65.95.138.210 |
| Author: Bing |
|
Hey, with all this coffee talk, should I mention that I work for Van Houtte? Wes, have you tried any dark roasts? Typically much lower caffeine than the medium and light roasts (but not caffeine-free), with better flavour than a decaf. PM me with an IRL mailing addy and I'll see if I can swing some frac-pac samples for you to try. |
| Date: 2007/05/12 12:27:51, Link 70.54.5.133 | ||||
| Author: Bing | ||||
This strikes me in the same vein as Richard Milhouse's infamous declaration,
|
| Date: 2007/06/27 16:04:04, Link 74.14.65.13 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
Yep, I think he's the one. IIRC AFDave used Brown as a source to explain the breakup of the continents in a day. Only AFDoodles couldn't explain how North and South America racing away from Africa at 145 kilometers per hour would not have boiled all the water off the planet. |
| Date: 2007/07/09 10:27:52, Link 70.54.4.116 |
| Author: Bing |
| I just read that thread and noticed that one of her comments from a Jim Sherwood points out that Behe is a pariah. Now, I don't think it's proper to use the correct term when FtK herself coined the spoonerism "...a pirahna to all scientific thought" on her own blog so I posted a comment correcting him. Any bets on whether she'll allow it through? |
| Date: 2007/07/09 11:49:13, Link 70.54.4.116 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
That you know what a Broadway show tune is, let alone writing alternate lyrics to the tune of a very famous song penned by the Gershwins, (and performed by Fred Astaire) gives DaveTard the biggest opportunity to call you a homo in all-caps bold. |
| Date: 2007/08/21 12:50:17, Link 70.54.4.226 | ||||
| Author: Bing | ||||
Well that and asking participants to email in comments. With all the forum software available they're asking participants to email comments??
So much for the lightly-moderated non-edited version that we all hoped Nelson and the Disco boys might provide. I know that was a stretch but today I'm an optimist. Anyone care to bet on where all the email to that address goes? I'm saying straight to "deleted items" and purged on the close of Outlook. |
| Date: 2007/11/24 11:25:14, Link 70.54.7.247 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
And it would be reasonable for the pope to give such advice if people actually married 12 year old altar boys. |
| Date: 2008/01/05 13:35:06, Link 74.15.78.20 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
Yeah, 3 college degrees and he thinks the evidence supports a 6000 year old earth. Except physics, because that doesn't agree with a 6000 year old earth. But if physics could be overturned somehow so that it supported a 6000 year old earth, then that would be good too. And this is someone who is allegedly an "aspiring scientist"? |
| Date: 2008/01/17 03:19:51, Link 74.15.76.170 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
South Park Wikipedia descripton of episode because the whole episode is getting harder to find on teh intarwebz. |
| Date: 2008/01/18 10:42:31, Link 74.15.76.170 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
And he makes perfect sense in Tardworld.
|
| Date: 2008/01/22 12:50:33, Link 74.15.76.170 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
Cart before the horse missy, if you saved it like a good girl, how would you know he's lousy? Given the abundance of fundy sex advice on teh intarwebz there should be no reason for a good girl to have any ideas about the perversions of intercourse, other than:
|
| Date: 2008/01/31 03:17:22, Link 74.15.77.167 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
But remember, DaveScot extrapolated his IQ from his SAT score. It's not from the Stanford-Binet. And he wrote his SAT not as a 17 yo while still in high school but as a 21 yo after a stint in the USMC. I'm thinking that perhaps some of the training he received in the Corps just might have given him an advantage when it came to taking the test. Edited because I can too! |
| Date: 2008/02/05 12:50:53, Link 70.54.4.189 |
| Author: Bing |
|
C'mon now, there's a perfectly reasonable explanation for that webpage. As all of us in the Evil Atheist Conspiracy® know, HTML is short for HyperText Materialist Language. And when the language was created the <GODDIDIT> tag was deprecated. Without the ability to embed <GODDIDIT> after the <HTML> tag in a webpage it forces them to deny the very existence of G*d. And because the Evil Atheist Conspiracy® controls the intarwebz through the W3C (another of the far reaching tentacles of the EAC®) then Godly Wingnut Pseudoscientists cannot create pages for the web. Or they haven't accomplished shite and can't be bothered, just like their journal. |
| Date: 2008/02/11 13:54:00, Link 74.14.67.159 | ||||
| Author: Bing | ||||
What is she doing? Go back and read Wes' comment about NCSE guidelines for testifying at a school board meeting. Do you see the point about "socio-political stance"? I'll quote it again here for your benefit.
Now let's put our noggins together and think about this FtK. What point is Genie trying to make? Got it yet? I'll give you a hint. The point that Genie is trying to make is that a typical school board would be more readily predisposed to listen to a priest/pastor on any subject including the subject of science standards while at the same time wholly discounting the learned opinions of experts in the sciences. Why did the Dover board dismiss the teachers' concerns? Was it on the basis of the relevant science or culture war? Now let's think about that for a moment. Take your typical school board member and posit the following scenarios. 1: he/she has an abscessed tooth 2: he/she has difficulty reading the newspaper 3: he/she has headaches, dizzyness and shortness of breath 4: he/she has been served with a lawsuit 5: he/she needs to know if he can renovate his house and add a room over the garage. 6: he/she needs help understanding the relevent science for school curriculum. For each question the school board member can choose from the following list. 1: priest or dentist 2: priest or optometrist 3: priest or physician 4: priest or lawyer 5: priest or architect 6: priest or scientist So tell me why a reasonable person would seek the opinion of the relevant professional in scenarios 1-5? Explain to me why that when it comes to question 6 all bets are off and the scientist is discounted? As has been said so many times before you aren't here to argue the science. You've proven many times that you don't understand it. You're here as a culture warrior. |
| Date: 2008/02/11 15:16:48, Link 74.14.67.159 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
FtK wrote:
So FtK annoints herself one of the leading lights of the ID movement? Before Dembski, before Luskin? Behe doesn't even rate a mention, nor do Gonzalez, Wells, Meyer, O'Leary, etc. A Kansas housewife ahead of the philosopher-mathematician who can't hold a job in legitimate academia and a lawyer who can't even figure out copyright. What exactly is ID about? Help us understand too. Can you explain the Theory of ID and the evidence for it? |
| Date: 2008/03/17 10:00:40, Link 76.68.131.35 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
And they referred to those Scotsmen as The Ladies from Hell. |
| Date: 2008/03/28 03:17:44, Link 70.54.7.154 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
I think she's unhappy about being restricted to the Bathroom Wall by Lou. She can't even post on her own thread IIRC. Her continued absence is probably her own version of Gandi's peaceful civil disobedience, although she probably wouldn't give him credit for the idea. He was after all a towel wearing Hindu, and was therefore as close to being an atheist as dammit. |
| Date: 2008/04/09 12:45:12, Link 76.68.131.73 | ||||
| Author: Bing | ||||
I doubt it! I knew a girl early in college who said she picked guys based on the size of their feet. In her (anecdotal) experience large feet were positively correlated with other large anatomical developments. I never did ask her if she had exceeded sample size at least n=10 and if her results approached the .05 level of confidence. Given this evidence however, I doubt very much if the Texas Houseboat Tard has big feet, as he writes and behaves very much like he is afflicted with Penis Minimus. |
| Date: 2008/04/09 18:04:39, Link 76.68.131.73 | ||||
| Author: Bing | ||||
You didn't want to perform a Pee Wee Herman in the theatre where Showgirls was playing and left in a state of partial tumescence? |
| Date: 2008/05/15 15:56:49, Link 66.203.190.145 |
| Author: Bing |
|
I was listening to Q on CBC this afternoon and Jian had the curator of Darwin’s Garden: An Evolutionary Adventure on talking about the exhibit. Any New Yorkers planning on taking it in? Podcast will be available here |
| Date: 2008/06/12 13:07:58, Link 66.203.188.26 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
Well, it could be 3000 or it could be 2.3 Billion. I haven't decided yet but I'm open-minded to either possibility. I suppose it's possible that the post counter in the code could be incorrect due to materialist atheist bias? |
| Date: 2008/06/20 10:18:38, Link 66.203.175.47 | ||||
| Author: Bing | ||||
Why did the Dr² have to start his own press? Has he become too wingnutty even for Regnery? |
| Date: 2008/06/26 18:36:28, Link 66.203.190.8 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
I don't blame you in the least. Disgusting. Have you thought about marrying her off to a nice young man from church? And she can be his help-meet and squeeze out youngins and bake pies for the church picnics and avoid message boards full of atheists-on-a-daily basis. |
| Date: 2008/06/30 16:36:33, Link 66.203.175.151 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
Hey now, the Reverend Ronald Simms is anything but a God denier. |
| Date: 2008/07/22 17:04:00, Link 66.203.191.134 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
[Graffiti moved to Bathroom Wall. -Admin]
I see we're having another "piranha" moment. The parents to whom your children would be entrusted are the descendants, the soupy sludge blob is the ancestor. You say piranha, I say pirhana You say tomato, I say tomahto piranha, piranha, tomato, tomato Let's call the whole thing off! |
| Date: 2008/07/27 07:55:00, Link 66.203.190.84 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
What? "Knock down ginger"? I thought that was the game you played after a few jars down the pub when you found out the red haired fellow at the next table cheered for Manchester City? Anyway, our version was called Nicky-Knicky Nine-Doors |
| Date: 2008/08/08 14:58:01, Link 209.213.227.18 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
Rugby! It must remind him of his Public School days, fond memories of straw boaters, bubble & squeak and buggery. |
| Date: 2008/08/20 14:22:28, Link 209.213.250.28 |
| Author: Bing |
|
A majority of Americans (57%) believe that Divine Intervention can heal loved ones when physicians determine that further treatment would be futile. Trauma Death Views of the Public and Trauma Professionals on Death and Dying From Injuries, Lenworth M. Jacobs, MD, MPH; Karyl Burns, RN, PhD; Barbara Bennett Jacobs, RN, MPH, PhD, CHPN, Arch Surg. 2008;143(8):730-735. And a linky to the article that piqued my interest initially. |
| Date: 2008/08/24 09:53:24, Link 209.213.250.28 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
No, it will not. Budweiser is now a Belgian-by-way-of-Brazil beer. If you want to offer apology gifts please try to make it a real American one. |
| Date: 2008/08/24 20:33:08, Link 209.213.250.28 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
I don't hate Belgo-Brazil. Belgium gives us Stella-Artois, and Brazil has given us the wax, both wonderful on their own and together, sublime! Bud has given us rice sugar in the wort. Are there rice paddies along the Mississippi? Then why is there rice in the beer? |
| Date: 2008/08/25 14:10:16, Link 209.213.227.183 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
Waterloo is among other things a city in southwestern Ontario, Canada. Jeffrey Shallit (he of the "Dembski is a pseudoscientist fraud" deposition from the Dover trial) is faculty at The University of Waterloo. I would presume that Dr. Shallit is even allowed to enter and eat at any of the UW cafeterias. That's gotta sting the Dr.Dr. Sweater. |
| Date: 2008/08/26 13:51:05, Link 209.213.227.183 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
Your *ahem* qualifications don't appear on your CV. Please provide the documentation at your earliest convenience so that the committee may make its determination. Pictures of new t-shirts will suffice. If you're jumping up and down while clapping giddily even better. |
| Date: 2008/08/26 15:15:20, Link 209.213.227.183 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
Everyone?? Evidently we have a [sneering]dogmatic trampolinist[/sneering] in our midst. I'll have you know sir that a rain-soaked trampoline is slippery and quite dangerous. If ERV so chooses she can perform jumping jacks with the *giddy clap* with her hands meeting at the top of the arm motion. She can also attempt to do this on a pogo stick, but removing hands to clap increases the degree of difficulty to 3.5. |
| Date: 2008/09/11 21:10:31, Link 66.203.175.109 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
11thousand or 11million. 6thousand or 3.6billion. Off by a factor of 1000, or off by a factor of 600,000. I think we should be open to the possibility that either is correct. Where exactly does the 11thousand-million number come from? No doubt from some unGodly materialist source like a ship's manifest, and probably written by an atheist. What does Uncle Waltie say about the Exxon Valdez? I bet he has some doozies. |
| Date: 2008/10/11 07:00:20, Link 66.203.191.156 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
First on the right and third on the left? You'll need to increase the training on your off side to balance your technique or you'll develop a wicked curve in your tadger that'll cause you to pee in the urinal beside you. Not a problem in and of itself really, but it does tend to upset any neighbours in the public loo. |
| Date: 2008/10/25 11:11:23, Link 66.203.190.16 |
| Author: Bing |
|
Reading people self-reporting high IQ's extrapolated from entrance exams on a science-based board is a little like reading Penthouse Forum for the stories of the proverbial 10" dick. We all know everybody here has got one. Well everbody except for ERV, although I would hope that she has a big black strap-on she's saving for Dr. Dr. Dembski. It also comes perilously close to borderline DaveTard behavior, but without the pathetic self-aggrandisement, boorishness and general wingnuttery-at-large. Be careful friends! |
| Date: 2008/10/27 19:18:31, Link 66.203.175.240 |
| Author: Bing |
|
Oh geez, I completely forgot about this thread. So back at the beginning of the month we threw a little birthday party for Alexander Keith. He was 213 on October 5th. Got a keg of Keith's, had a few bottles of whisky and all was good. On the nosh side we served Jigg's dinner (corned beef & cabbage), some salmon, Steak and Guinness pie, neeps & tatties, mushie peas. Celtic music and more whisky for afters. Unfortunately some miscreants decided that The Macallan Fine Oak 15 yo ($125/bottle), Lagavulin 16 yo ($115/bottle ) and my Highland Park 30 yo ($399) would make excellent shooters. Sadly all are now but a memory. Here are some pictures. |
| Date: 2008/10/31 04:55:48, Link 216.59.232.250 | ||||||
| Author: Bing | ||||||
I thought the same thing. Olive oil?? Chunky Ragu?? Balsamic vinegar?? Next we'll find out that he doesn't use basmati rice, preferring arborio to make a risotto and that instead of a nice raeta on the side he just sprinkles a little parmesan. Keep this up steve and Madhur Jaffrey will come to your house and slap you about the head with hot naan fresh from the tandoor. Or maybe Mario Batali will come and beat you with pasta rags. Better yet, both will show up to slap you about the head for bastardizing each of their respective cuisines. |
| Date: 2008/10/31 13:25:41, Link 216.59.232.250 | ||||||
| Author: Bing | ||||||
Mario, dead drunk under your table? If what Anthony Bourdain (himself no slouch in the "legendary appetites" department) has written about Mario is even halfway true then he has nothing to fear from you.
But you keep making those Italian curries. Unfortunately they are to cooking what afdave is to science education :) |
| Date: 2008/11/01 13:32:35, Link 66.203.175.230 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
And this is the knife!  |
| Date: 2008/11/15 13:02:08, Link 209.213.250.59 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
what, you're not making your special Spaghetti Vindaloo? I made this autumn soup last night. Everyone had 2 bowls, some went back for a third. Made it kind of hard to eat the steaks as the main. Apple and butternut squash soup Serves 4 to 6 2 tablespoons (25 mL) butter 1 cup (250 mL) chopped onion 3 cups (750 mL) cubed peeled butternut squash 2 cups (500 mL) diced, peeled apple 4 cups (1 L) canned chicken broth 1 cup (250 mL) apple juice 3/4 teaspoon (3 mL) salt 1/2 teaspoon (2 mL) ground coriander 1/2 teaspoon (2 mL) ground ginger 1/2 teaspoon (2 mL) nutmeg 1/2 teaspoon (2 mL) freshly ground pepper Chopped fresh parsley, paprika as garnish Melt butter in a heavy bottom pot (dutch oven) over medium heat. Add onion and saute until softened, about five minutes. Add squash and apple; saute for two minutes. Stir in next seven ingredients (broth through pepper). Bring to a boil. Reduce heat. Simmer, uncovered, stirring occasionally, until squash and apple are tender, about 25 to 30 minutes. Puree soup in batches in a blender, filling blender no more than half full for each batch. Return soup to pan and heat to serving temperature. Serve sprinkled with parsley and paprika. If you want to crunch it up a bit you can make your own 'crackers' Take a baguette, slice it on a shallow diagonal about 1/2" thick, brush with olive oil and slide it in a 400 oven until they're golden brown. Make it all ahead of time and you can reheat the soup when you need it. |
| Date: 2008/11/16 08:13:52, Link 209.213.255.75 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
I can't believe I missed this straight line, I must be getting old.
2 words steve, edible condoms |
| Date: 2008/11/18 05:22:53, Link 209.213.227.37 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
It's just that, an urban legend. The Canadian Food Inspection agency would have locked their doors by now if Tim had been doing that. I suspect there are a few things that contributed to this myth; the flavour (boiled ass strained through a filter made of will-not encrusted arsehole hairs) coupled with the tendency for people to line up around the block to purchase and consume the swill. Reasonable people wouldn't willingly do that, so it's gotta be the addition of an adictive agent so goes the thinking. In reality it's their coffee and the roast. The last price I saw when I was in the coffee biz was under $2.75/lb finished. Really low grade Robusta coupled with a light roast that preserves the amount of residual caffeine that makes it into the cup. At the end of the cycle they crank the heat up to burn the surface of the beans to impart some colour to the brew. The 'prototypical' tim's is a double-double - 2 sugars and 2 shots of cream - so the coffee has to have some body to stand up. And where most places use half-n-half or 10% tim's uses 18% cream. A coffee has to be really dark to take this or it doesn't look like coffee. If anything it's the butterfat in the 18% that is the addictive agent, fat carries flavour in foods. Remember kiddies, coffee roasting and residual caffeine content is opposite to what most people think; lighter roast = more caffeine but less flavour, darker roast = less caffeine and a much stronger flavour (b/c the increased heat burns more of it off). The next time you need a high test pick-me-up, order a light roast, save the dark roasts for late afternoon or after dinner when you want taste but need to be able to sleep. |
| Date: 2009/02/08 13:12:16, Link 66.203.188.208 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
That is what my scouser Nana referred to as "Toad-in-a-hole". My kids still love it. |
| Date: 2009/02/12 12:05:45, Link 66.203.188.183 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
I'm sure everybody remembers when The Reverend Brother Doctor Doctor Dembski took his wife and autistic son to the Faith Healer and even he was ignored? |
| Date: 2009/02/13 08:41:30, Link 209.213.255.17 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
Just keep that thing in your mouth unless you intend to share. |
| Date: 2009/02/23 11:39:32, Link 209.213.227.29 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
|
| Date: 2009/03/04 19:31:30, Link 209.213.254.116 | ||||
| Author: Bing | ||||
Close, but not quite. The Dr.Dr. went to faith healer Todd Bentley. The Dembski spawn is autistic.
Full article at the Baptist Press |
| Date: 2009/03/26 19:54:20, Link 209.213.227.119 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
Are they allowed to eat in the Baylor cafeteria? |
| Date: 2009/04/24 07:08:07, Link 66.203.190.36 |
| Author: Bing |
|
I know some of the others around here are old enuf to remember this, even if you aren't. Happy Birthday |
| Date: 2009/04/26 09:29:52, Link 209.213.254.134 | ||
| Author: Bing | ||
It was freshman year and I was bangin' a girl who reminded me of Claire Grogan. Which is much better than freshman year for Louis when he was banging someone that reminded him of Boy George. |
=====
