Skip navigation.
Home
The Critic's Resource on AntiEvolution

NCSE Evolution and Climate Education Update for 2014/01/03

(by NCSE Deputy Director Glenn Branch)

Dear friends of NCSE,

Interesting data about American attitudes toward evolution and
creationism in a new Pew Research Center report. Sad news of the death
of Ian Barbour. And NCSE's archives reach a milestone.

A NEW PEW POLL ON EVOLUTION

Six in ten Americans accept human evolution, while a third hold that
humans and other living things have existed in their present form
since the beginning of time, according to a new report from the Pew
Research Center. Asked, "Which comes closer to your view?" and
presented with "Humans and other living things have evolved over time"
and "Humans and other living things have existed in their present form
since the beginning of time," 60% of respondents accepted the
evolution option, 33% the creationist option, and 7% said that they
didn't know or refused to answer. In 2009, 61% of respondents accepted
the evolution option, 31% the creationist option, and 8% said that
they didn't know or refused to answer.

Those who agreed that humans have evolved over time were asked whether
they thought "[h]umans and other living things have evolved due to
natural processes such as natural selection" or "[a] supreme being
guided the evolution of living things for the purpose of creating
humans and other life in the form it exists today"; 53% preferred
natural processes, 40% preferred guidance by a supreme being, and 7%
said that they didn't know or refused to answer. Thus 32% of all the
respondents chose evolution through natural processes, 24% chose
guided evolution, and 33% chose creationism. In 2009, 32% chose
evolution through natural processes, 22% chose guided evolution, and
31% chose creationism.

The survey also asked a different group about evolution in such a way
as not to highlight human evolution, with the word "animals"
substituted for "humans." There was little difference: 63% of
respondents accepted the evolution option, 32% the creationist option,
and 5% said that they didn't know or refused to answer. Those who
agreed that animals have evolved over time were asked whether they
thought it was due to natural selection or guidance by a supreme
being: 56% preferred natural processes, 38% preferred guidance by a
supreme being, and 8% said that they didn't know or refused to answer.
Thus 35% of all the respondents chose evolution through natural
processes, 24% chose guided evolution, and 32% chose creationism.

The Pew Research Center's report commented, "These beliefs differ
strongly by religious group. White evangelical Protestants are
particularly likely to believe that humans have existed in their
present form since the beginning of time. Roughly two-thirds (64%)
express this view, as do half of black Protestants (50%). By
comparison, only 15% of white mainline Protestants share this opinion.
There also are sizable differences by party affiliation in beliefs
about evolution, and the gap between Republicans and Democrats has
grown. In 2009, 54% of Republicans and 64% of Democrats said humans
have evolved over time, a difference of 10 percentage points. Today,
43% of Republicans and 67% of Democrats say humans have evolved, a
24-point gap."

Except for the questions about animal evolution, the report was "based
on telephone interviews conducted March 21-April 8, 2013, among a
national sample of 1,983 adults, 18 years of age or older, living in
all 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia (1,017 respondents
were interviewed on a landline telephone, and 966 were interviewed on
a cellphone). Interviews were completed in English and Spanish by
live, professionally trained interviewing staff under the direction of
Princeton Survey Research Associates International. The margin of
error at the 95% level of confidence for the entire sample was +/- 3%.
The questions about animal evolution were asked of a group of 2,023
respondents, and the margin of error for that group is +/- 2.9%.

For the report, visit:
http://www.pewforum.org/2013/12/30/publics-views-on-human-evolution/ 

And for NCSE's collection of polls and surveys, visit:
http://ncse.com/creationism/polls-surveys 

IAN BARBOUR DIES

The distinguished scholar of science and religion Ian Barbour died on
December 24, 2013, at the age of 90, according to Carleton College
(December 27, 2013). Often credited with founding the academic field
of science and religion, Barbour was the author of Religion in an Age
of Science (HarperCollins 1990), Ethics in an Age of Technology
(HarperCollins 1993), When Science Meets Religion (HarperOne 2000),
and Nature, Human Nature, and God (Fortress Press 2009) among other
books.

In When Science Meets Religion, after reviewing the contentious
history of efforts to undermine the teaching of evolution in the
United States, Barbour wrote, "I believe that creation science is a
threat to both religious and scientific freedom," adding, with respect
to Phillip Johnson and Michael Behe, "though these authors are not
biblical literalists they err in assuming that evolutionary theory and
theism are incompatible. They, too, perpetuate the false dilemma of
having to choose between science and religion." Barbour expanded on
his disagreement with "intelligent design" in a 2000 talk (published
in Zygon in 2001) critical of his fellow scholar of science and
religion Huston Smith's sympathy for the position, writing:
"Philosophical proponents of intelligent design, such as William
Dembski ... and Stephen Meyer ..., write in the tradition of natural
theology, in which science is used as evidence of the existence of a
designer. My own approach is not natural theology but a theology of
nature, in which one asks how nature understood by science is related
to the divine as understood from the religious experience of a
historical community." Describing "intelligent design" at least in
Behe's and Smith's versions as assuming "intermittent divine
intervention," he warned, "The God of the gaps has steadily retreated
in the history of modern science." In the same talk, he noted that
"[s]cientists have to assume methodological naturalism," that
"intelligent design" proponents "do not offer testable hypothesis for
scientific research," and that "virtually the entire scientific
community agrees on descent with modification from earlier ancestors."

Barbour was born in Beijing, China, on October 5, 1923. He studied
physics, receiving his BA from Swarthmore College, his MA from Duke
University in 1943, and his PhD from the University of Chicago in
1950. He then earned a BD from Yale Divinity School in 1956. After a
few years teaching physics at Kalamazoo College, he went to Carleton
College, where he spent the rest of his career in the physics and
religion departments, retiring in 1986. Among his honors was his
Gifford Lectureship in 1989-1991 and the Templeton Prize for Progress
in Religion in 1999.

For the obituary notice at Carleton College, visit:
http://apps.carleton.edu/farewells/?story_id=1081774 

For Barbour's paper in Zygon (PDF, subscription required), visit:
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/0591-2385.00351/pdf 

A MILESTONE FOR NCSE'S ARCHIVES

NCSE's archives now contain three thousand books! The lucky 3000th
book in NCSE's collection is Philosophy of Pseudoscience:
Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem, edited by Massimo Pigliucci and
Maarten Boudry (University of Chicago Press, 2013). As it happens, the
book contains contributions from Barbara Forrest, a member of NCSE's
board of directors; Michael Ruse, a member of NCSE's Advisory Council;
and various scholars who have worked with NCSE or published in Reports
of the NCSE, including Stefaan Blancke, Michael Shermer, Donald
Prothero, and John S. Wilkins.

The books in NCSE's archives are catalogued on-line at LibraryThing.
LibraryThing offers a variety of automatically compiled statistics,
according to which NCSE's books weigh about two tons (1877 kilograms)
and contain over nine hundred thousand pages in total, and would, if
stacked, would reach 325.8 feet (99.3 meters), slightly higher than
the Elizabeth Tower of the Palace of Westminster, which houses the
bell Big Ben. If you'd like to contribute to the stack, and perhaps
add the 3001st book to NCSE's collection, visit NCSE's wish list at
Amazon.com.

For NCSE's catalogue and statistics at LibraryThing, visit:
http://www.librarything.com/catalog/NCSE 
http://www.librarything.com/profile/ncse/stats/physical 

For information about Philosophy of Pseudoscience, visit:
http://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/P/bo15996988.html 

And for NCSE's wish list at Amazon.com, visit:
http://www.amazon.com/gp/registry/wishlist/39U1UMFQ22WED/ 

WHAT'S NEW FROM THE SCIENCE LEAGUE OF AMERICA

Have you been visiting NCSE's blog, The Science League of America,
recently? If not, then you've missed:

* Steve Newton continuing his series on creationism and the Grand Canyon:
http://ncse.com/blog/2013/12/creationist-grand-canyon-claim-4-grand-canyon-rocks-were-0015274 

* Glenn Branch investigating rumors of giant human remains:
http://ncse.com/blog/2013/12/goliath-peloponnese-0015268 

And much more besides!

For The Science League of America, visit:
http://ncse.com/blog 

Thanks for reading. And don't forget to visit NCSE's website --
http://ncse.com -- where you can always find the latest news on 
evolution and climate education and threats to them.

--
With best wishes for the new year,

--
Sincerely,

Glenn Branch
Deputy Director
National Center for Science Education, Inc.
420 40th Street, Suite 2
Oakland, CA 94609-2509
510-601-7203 x305
fax: 510-601-7204
800-290-6006
branch@ncse.com 
http://ncse.com 

Check out NCSE's new blog, Science League of America:
http://ncse.com/blog 

Read Reports of the NCSE on-line:
http://reports.ncse.com 

Subscribe to NCSE's free weekly e-newsletter:
http://groups.google.com/group/ncse-news 

NCSE is on Facebook, YouTube, and Twitter:
http://www.facebook.com/evolution.ncse 
http://www.youtube.com/NatCen4ScienceEd 
http://twitter.com/ncse 

NCSE's work is supported by its members. Join today!
http://ncse.com/join