The Critic's Resource on AntiEvolution
|
Dossiers | Home | Incidents | Literature | Projects | Public BB | Topics |
Donate | NCSE | PT | TD | TOA | Public BB Archive | PvM's Blog | |
Who's onlineThere are currently 0 users and 0 guests online.
NavigationUser loginFeatured BookDonateRandom ArticlesStore |
news aggregatorAugust 2006 Post of the Month: The Constancy of Constants, Part 2Added September 18, 2006:
Categories: Pro-Science News
August 2006 Co-Post of the Month: An Atheist's Defense of ReligionAdded September 18, 2006:
Categories: Pro-Science News
MacroevolutionUpdated September 16, 2006: In evolutionary biology today macroevolution is used to refer to any evolutionary change at or above the level of species. It means the splitting of a species into two or the change of a species over time into another. This FAQ has been expanded, updated, illustrated, and rewritten.
Categories: Pro-Science News
Hendren v. Campbell: Decision Against a Creationist TextbookAdded August 20, 2006: A 1977 decision of an Indiana superior court ruling against a textbook produced by the Creation Research Society. In some respects this case resembles a young-earth creationist version of the 2005 Kitzmiller case. Introductory material, links, as well as the full text of the judge's memorandum opinion are provided.
Categories: Pro-Science News
Young-Earth Creationist Helium Diffusion "Dates": Fallacies Based on Bad Assumptions and Questionable DataUpdated July 25, 2006: Young-Earth creationists consider the helium diffusion studies of D. Russell Humphreys and others to be one of their greatest achievements in arguing for a 6,000 year old Earth. A geologist shows that these studies are extensively flawed and include: serious miscalculations in their data, sampling the wrong rock type, failing to eliminate possible contamination, using equations that are based on invalid assumptions and relying on questionable data. Appendices C and D have been added in response to Dr. Humphreys' most recent statements in his January 2006 "Trueorigins" essay.
Categories: Pro-Science News
June 2006 Post of the Month: How Species OriginateAdded July 25, 2006:
Categories: Pro-Science News
May 2006 Post of the Month: The Evolution of OrgansAdded July 3, 2006:
Categories: Pro-Science News
April 2006 Post of the Month: The Precambrian Song!Added May 11, 2006:
Categories: Pro-Science News
February 2006 Post of the Month: Identifying FossilsAdded March 18, 2006:
Categories: Pro-Science News
January 2006 Post of the Month: Large Numbers and Deep TimeAdded February 17, 2006:
Categories: Pro-Science News
January 2006 Co-Post of the Month: Trying to Keep Up With the JonesesAdded February 17, 2006:
Categories: Pro-Science News
Evidence for the Big BangThis article covers the evidence which leads cosmologists to believe the Big Bang happened, deals with common objections to the theory, and discusses alternative models and questions that still remain to be answered.
Categories: Pro-Science News
December 2005 Post of the Month: Unanswered QuestionsAdded January 24, 2006:
Categories: Pro-Science News
How Old is the Earth: A Response to "Scientific" CreationismAdded January 10, 2006: A classic and often-referenced 1984 paper by G. Brent Dalrymple. The paper contains short but accurate expositions of radiometric dating methods and discussions of creationist criticisms and attempts to date the Earth as young. It includes material difficult to find elsewhere, such as the discussion of mixing isochrons and the effect of neutron-capture reactions. Dr. Dalrymple is a member of the National Academy of Sciences, a winner of the National Medal of Science, a former president of the American Geophysical Union, and the author of The Age of the Earth
Categories: Pro-Science News
Science & Human Origins: Interview with Dr. Ann GaugerListen Now. On this episode of ID the Future, Casey Luskin interviews Dr. Ann Gauger, co-author of Science & Human Origins and senior research scientist at the Biologic Institute. In recent years, human origins has become an especially hot...
Categories: Anti-Science News
Science & Human Origins: Interview with Casey LuskinListen Now. On this episode of ID the Future, the CSC's Rob Crowther speaks with Casey Luskin, co-author of the new book Science & Human Origins. There are frequent and spurious claims made in the media that the genetic...
Categories: Anti-Science News
Non-Religious Skeptics of Darwinian EvolutionClick here to listen. On this episode of ID the Future, hear Casey Luskin's interview with Issues, Etc., in which he responds to false claims that intelligent design theory is based on religious belief. Casey discusses how many Darwin...
Categories: Anti-Science News
How We Know Intelligent Design is ScienceClick here to listen. On this episode of ID the Future, Casey Luskin addresses the question: Is intelligent design science? While the precise definition of "science" has long been debated, most would agree that there are certain qualities that...
Categories: Anti-Science News
Dr. Ann Gauger: Biology Still Surprises UsListen Now. On this episode of ID the Future, Andrew McDiarmid talks with biologist Ann Gauger about the ability of biology to continually surprise us--even when we think the science is settled. Dr. Gauger discusses some scientific "facts" that...
Categories: Anti-Science News
Dr. Jonathan Wells: How Much of the Human Genome is Functional?Listen Now. On this episode of ID the Future, Casey Luskin interviews Dr. Jonathan Wells about a recent article that claims that the human genome is full of useless, non-functional DNA. Dr. Wells explains the concept of "junk DNA,"...
Categories: Anti-Science News
|
RSS SyndicationAntievolutionists Say the Darndest ThingsAntievolutionists often express outrage over alleged incivility from those who oppose their efforts to evade the establishment clause of the First Amendment. But they have no difficulty in dishing out the abuse themselves. Here is a sample from the Invidious Comparisons thread that documents egregious behavior on the part of the religious antievolution advocates. Dembski, as the director of the center, also commented on the report in a one-paragraph e-mail message following its release. "The report marks the triumph of intelligent design as a legitimate form of academic inquiry. This is a great day for academic freedom," Dembski began. He concluded by observing that "Dogmatic opponents of design who demanded the Center be shut down have met their Waterloo. Baylor University is to be commended for remaining strong in the face of intolerant assaults on freedom of thought and expression." Pro-Science Sites
|