Joined: Sep. 2006
|Quote (someotherguy @ June 10 2007,22:30)|
|Quote (stevestory @ June 10 2007,23:26)|
|It's easy to keep within the right levels, though. When Uncommonly Dense starts to make sense, that's how you know you drank too much.|
If Denyse's latest "contribution" is any standard, I'll be found lying dead in a pool of my own vomit before that happens.
Remember that she's 50% water, so I guess the rest is scotch? Well. I just think it's so stunning that these guys can make predictions like this, considering that they (incessantly) assert that one cannot predict climate change because the weatherman is usually wrong about the weather three days out. But hey, let's be cool about this:
They say 2025, party over, oops, outtatime...
So tonight I say we party like it's 1999:
|“Darwinists will no doubt object to this characterization of their theory. For them Darwinism continues to be a fruitful theory—one whose imminent demise I am greatly exaggerating.” William Dembski, Intelligent Design, (Downers Grove, Illinois, 1999), p. 113 |
I was drinking when I wrote this, so sue me if it goes astray.
Which came first: the shimmy, or the hip?
AtBC Poet Laureate
"I happen to think that this prerequisite criterion of empirical evidence is itself not empirical." - Clive
"Damn you. This means a trip to the library. Again." -- fnxtr