RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (2) < [1] 2 >   
  Topic: Jonathan Wells reiterates his goal< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
Jason Spaceman



Posts: 163
Joined: Nov. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 06 2006,15:06   

Quote
By SEKAI NIPPO

TOKYO -- The Intelligent Design (ID) theory that advocates the involvement of an intelligent designer in the origin and evolution of the universe and life is gaining popularity in the United States. This is an indication that an increasing number of people, including scientists, have become aware of the shaky ground on which Darwin’s evolutionary theory stands.

There have been quite a few books critiquing Darwin’s evolution theory. But it was “Icons of Evolution – Science or Myth?” —authored by American biologist Jonathan Wells and published in 2000—that perhaps has had the greatest impact on the debate.  In it, Wells reveals the widespread distortions in biology textbooks explaining evolution.. . .

. . .“My goal,” says Wells, “is to bring about the collapse of Darwin’s evolution theory by 2009, the 150th anniversary of publication of Charles Darwin’s “The Origin of Species” in 1859.


Read it here.

   
Russell



Posts: 1082
Joined: April 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 06 2006,16:24   

Puzzled by the seemingly anachronistic tone of the article ("The Intelligent Design (ID) theory ...is gaining popularity in the United States."), I looked into the credibility of this source. Sure enough:
Quote
World Peace Herald is published by News World Communications, Inc., and carries on its tradition of excellence in journalism.
... a Moonie propaganda rag.

("American biologist, Jonathan Wells". [guffaw])

--------------
Must... not... scratch... mosquito bite.

  
Arden Chatfield



Posts: 6657
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 06 2006,18:00   

Quote (Jason Spaceman @ Nov. 06 2006,21:06)
 
Quote
By SEKAI NIPPO

TOKYO -- The Intelligent Design (ID) theory that advocates the involvement of an intelligent designer in the origin and evolution of the universe and life is gaining popularity in the United States. This is an indication that an increasing number of people, including scientists, have become aware of the shaky ground on which Darwin’s evolutionary theory stands.

There have been quite a few books critiquing Darwin’s evolution theory. But it was “Icons of Evolution – Science or Myth?” —authored by American biologist Jonathan Wells and published in 2000—that perhaps has had the greatest impact on the debate.  In it, Wells reveals the widespread distortions in biology textbooks explaining evolution.. . .

. . .“My goal,” says Wells, “is to bring about the collapse of Darwin’s evolution theory by 2009, the 150th anniversary of publication of Charles Darwin’s “The Origin of Species” in 1859.


Read it here.

After the Discovery Institute put their foot in their mouth(s) with their Wedge Document timetable for the 'defeat of materialism', you'd think these dimwits would have learned to quit saying over-specific things like 'Darwinism will be defeated by 2009'.

Oh well, if he's stupid enough to be a Moonie, we shouldn't be surprised that he's stupid enough to think he'll make Darwinism 'collapse' in 3 years.

--------------
"Rich is just mad because he thought all titties had fur on them until last week when a shorn transvestite ruined his childhood dreams by jumping out of a spider man cake and man boobing him in the face lips." - Erasmus

  
mcc



Posts: 110
Joined: July 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 10 2006,01:25   

There is absolutely no doubt in my mind that when 2009 comes, Jonathan wells will suddenly declare that Darwinism has collapsed, and declare victory for himself and defeat for Darwinism.

  
Kristine



Posts: 3061
Joined: Sep. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 10 2006,16:42   

Well, the World Peace Herald sure didn't include my comments on that article. (Just as well, since the scoring system doesn't offer any choice less than 1.)

We should trumpet the "Dead by 2009" far and wide, as well as Dembski's "Evolution dead in 10 years" (well, 9 1/2 now) and "Nobel Prizes for ID in 15 years" gaffes. These dorks count on the American people to forget, in order to play upon ever-present resentments and a perpetual sense of underdoggedness (a term I just made up). I say, keep these "promises" in the public eye, so that eventually people will squint at it: "Hey, isn't evolution supposed to be dead by now? What happened?"

--------------
Which came first: the shimmy, or the hip?

AtBC Poet Laureate

"I happen to think that this prerequisite criterion of empirical evidence is itself not empirical." - Clive

"Damn you. This means a trip to the library. Again." -- fnxtr

  
"Rev Dr" Lenny Flank



Posts: 2560
Joined: Feb. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 10 2006,19:17   

Quote (Jason Spaceman @ Nov. 06 2006,15:06)
. . .“My goal,” says Wells, “is to bring about the collapse of Darwin’s evolution theory by 2009

Waterloo !!!! Waterloo !!!!! Waterloo !!!!!!

(yawn)  I wish I had a dollar for every time some fundie nutcake breathlessly declared the imminent collapse of "darwinism".

--------------
Editor, Red and Black Publishers
www.RedandBlackPublishers.com

  
plasmasnake23



Posts: 42
Joined: June 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 10 2006,19:55   

If psychics have taught us anything it's that brining up old predictions will just cause backwards fitting and insane rationalizations by those who made them. I'm sure Wells will either claim it did collapse or that it would have if not for A and B and C happening...

  
mcc



Posts: 110
Joined: July 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 11 2006,21:56   

Quote (Kristine @ Nov. 10 2006,16:42)
Well, the World Peace Herald sure didn't include my comments on that article. (Just as well, since the scoring system doesn't offer any choice less than 1.)

We should trumpet the "Dead by 2009" far and wide, as well as Dembski's "Evolution dead in 10 years" (well, 9 1/2 now) and "Nobel Prizes for ID in 15 years" gaffes. These dorks count on the American people to forget, in order to play upon ever-present resentments and a perpetual sense of underdoggedness (a term I just made up). I say, keep these "promises" in the public eye, so that eventually people will squint at it: "Hey, isn't evolution supposed to be dead by now? What happened?"

http://home.entouch.net/dmd/moreandmore.htm

  
Arden Chatfield



Posts: 6657
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 12 2006,11:48   

Quote (mcc @ Nov. 11 2006,21:56)
 
Quote (Kristine @ Nov. 10 2006,16:42)
Well, the World Peace Herald sure didn't include my comments on that article. (Just as well, since the scoring system doesn't offer any choice less than 1.)

We should trumpet the "Dead by 2009" far and wide, as well as Dembski's "Evolution dead in 10 years" (well, 9 1/2 now) and "Nobel Prizes for ID in 15 years" gaffes. These dorks count on the American people to forget, in order to play upon ever-present resentments and a perpetual sense of underdoggedness (a term I just made up). I say, keep these "promises" in the public eye, so that eventually people will squint at it: "Hey, isn't evolution supposed to be dead by now? What happened?"

http://home.entouch.net/dmd/moreandmore.htm

A splendid collection, but for some reason I especially like this one:

 
Quote
1998

“Darwin gave us a creation story, one in which God was absent and undirected natural processes did all the work. That creation story has held sway for more than a hundred years. It is now on the way out. When it goes, so will all the edifices that have been built on its foundation.” William A. Dembski, “Introduction to Mere Creation,” in William A. Dembski, ed.,  Mere Creation, (Downer’s Grove, Ill.: Intervarsity Press, 1998), pp 13-30, p. 29


Ooooh, but these ain't bad, either:


Quote
1998
Of Evolution:

"In appearance it is as impregnable as the Soviet Union seemed a few years ago. But the ship has sprung a metaphysical leak, and that leak widens as more and more people understand it and draw attention to the conflict between empirical science and materialist philosophy. The more perceptive of the ship's officers know that the ship is doomed if the leak cannot be plugged. The struggle to save the ship will go on for a while, and meanwhile there will even be academic wine-and-cheese parties on the deck. In the end the ship's great firepower and ponderous armor will only help drag it to the bottom." Phillip Johnson, "How to Sink a Battleship," in William A. Dembski, ed.,  Mere Creation, (Downer’s Grove, Ill.: Intervarsity Press, 1998), pp 446-453, p. 453

“I believe that at some time well before 2059, the bicentennial year of Darwin’s ‘Origin of Species,’ perhaps as early as 2009 or 2019, there will be another celebration that will mark the demise of the Darwinist ideology that was so triumphant in 1959.’” Phillip Johnson, “How to Sink a Battleship,’ in Mere Creation, ed. By William A. Dembski, (Downers Grove, Ill.: InterVarsity Press, 1998), p. 446-453, p. 448


(my boldfacing)

I especially like "academic wine-and-cheese parties on the deck". WD's unsubtle pandering to his core audience of uneducated Jesus freaks who distrust all academics as effete atheist liberals. No wonder he works with Ann Coulter.

And you can almost hear his between-the-lines yelp:

"academic wine-and-cheese parties that no one invited ME to, goddammit! !"

--------------
"Rich is just mad because he thought all titties had fur on them until last week when a shorn transvestite ruined his childhood dreams by jumping out of a spider man cake and man boobing him in the face lips." - Erasmus

  
Richardthughes



Posts: 11177
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 13 2006,15:01   

We've been attacked by the intelligent, educated segment of the culture" Rev. Ray Mummert

AND they have a battleship, and wine and cheese. FRENCH cheese, as well.

*shakes fist*

Do you know what can stop a battleship, boys?
PRAYER!

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
Kristine



Posts: 3061
Joined: Sep. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 28 2006,17:48   

Quote
The struggle to save the ship will go on for a while, and meanwhile there will even be academic wine-and-cheese parties on the deck. In the end the ship's great firepower and ponderous armor will only help drag it to the bottom. (Dembski)


In this witty allusion to the Titanic, Dembski seems to forget all the low class, expendable, "unwashed masses" (his pet phrase) who were locked in the lower cabins and went down with the ship.

Intelligent design will be triumphant when all the poor/working class people of the world are told, "Say two prayers and don't call me in the morning." If I thought Dembski would give an honest answer I would ask him, Do you care at all about people like me? And if he said no, I would ask him why.

He likes to count himself as one of the "unwashed masses," but I doubt that he grew up around people without health insurance or who had missing limbs and such, as I did. I am the first person in my family to get a college degree. I don't think he cocktail-waitressed his way through college and had to put up with the sexual harassment that goes with the job.

No one likes to talk about class in America and no one is talking about how this is a class war. Wine-and-cheese parties on the ship's deck, indeed! I'm doing okay for myself now, but I'm willing to bet they're awash in cash at the good old DI.

--------------
Which came first: the shimmy, or the hip?

AtBC Poet Laureate

"I happen to think that this prerequisite criterion of empirical evidence is itself not empirical." - Clive

"Damn you. This means a trip to the library. Again." -- fnxtr

  
steve_h



Posts: 544
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 28 2006,21:14   

Quote (Kristine @ Nov. 29 2006,00:48)
     
Quote
The struggle to save the ship will go on for a while, and meanwhile there will even be academic wine-and-cheese parties on the deck. In the end the ship's great firepower and ponderous armor will only help drag it to the bottom. (Dembski)


In this witty allusion to the Titanic, Dembski seems to forget all the low class, expendable, "unwashed masses" (his pet phrase) who were locked in the lower cabins and went down with the ship.

Wasn't that Phillip E. Johnson using the battleship Titanic metaphor, Lou(*)? (How to sink a battleship)

* or whoever.

  
carlsonjok



Posts: 3326
Joined: May 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 28 2006,21:42   

Quote (Kristine @ Nov. 28 2006,17:48)
 
Quote
The struggle to save the ship will go on for a while, and meanwhile there will even be academic wine-and-cheese parties on the deck. In the end the ship's great firepower and ponderous armor will only help drag it to the bottom. (Dembski)

In this witty allusion to the Titanic, Dembski seems to forget all the low class, expendable, "unwashed masses" (his pet phrase) who were locked in the lower cabins and went down with the ship.

Well, the Titanic was not a warship and thus did not possess great firepower or heavy armor to drag her to the bottom.  A Bismarck metaphor would probably be more appropriate inasmuch as it was a warship and it also allows the allusion to Darwinists as Nazis.  Just saying.

--------------
It's natural to be curious about our world, but the scientific method is just one theory about how to best understand it.  We live in a democracy, which means we should treat every theory equally. - Steven Colbert, I Am America (and So Can You!)

  
Kristine



Posts: 3061
Joined: Sep. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 28 2006,22:57   

Quote
Wasn't that Phillip E. Johnson using the battleship Titanic metaphor

Quote
A Bismarck metaphor would probably be more appropriate


Ah, my apologies to both Dembski and the Titanic.

I still wonder what comes after this supposed "death" of evolutionary theory, though.

We know what they're against. What are they for? Water and bread crusts in a dinghy?

--------------
Which came first: the shimmy, or the hip?

AtBC Poet Laureate

"I happen to think that this prerequisite criterion of empirical evidence is itself not empirical." - Clive

"Damn you. This means a trip to the library. Again." -- fnxtr

  
skeptic



Posts: 1163
Joined: May 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 28 2006,23:41   

They're not "for" anything.  There's no way to test for the designer so they have to be content to disprove ToE as evidence of design.  The thing that really confuses me given the fact that some of these people are actually intelligent individuals is that even if they bring down ToE which must be done using scientific methods they're still no closer to proving the existence of a designer which cannot be done using scientific methods (or at all).  You'd think they would at least be able to see that even if the did disagree with ToE.  That, to me, is what stinks so much of "agenda".

  
Alan Fox



Posts: 1552
Joined: Aug. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 29 2006,02:10   

Ah, Rich, you, as always can be relied on to make the salient point.
Quote
AND they have a battleship, and wine and cheese. FRENCH cheese, as well.


Do you actually get real French cheese in the US?

  
k.e



Posts: 1948
Joined: Mar. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 29 2006,07:36   

Quote
Do you actually get real French cheese in the US?


Le Freedom Framage :>

--------------
The conservative has but little to fear from the man whose reason is the servant of his passions, but let him beware of him in whom reason has become the greatest and most terrible of the passions.These are the wreckers of outworn empires and civilisations, doubters, disintegrators, deicides.Haldane

   
Lou FCD



Posts: 5452
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 29 2006,10:49   

Quote (steve_h @ Nov. 28 2006,21:14)
Wasn't that Phillip E. Johnson using the battleship Titanic metaphor, Lou(*)? (How to sink a battleship)

* or whoever.

Um... Steve.  Are you quietly asking if Kristine is one of my sockpuppets?

That's too funny, and you're paranoid.  My two girls don't post here, although they're big fans.

Janie once wondered why that is, btw.  After all, SHE didn't break any rules, I did.

Kinda hard to argue with her point...

Anyways, Kristine is quite real.  Well, at least as real as anyone else on the web.  I've certainly never had cause to doubt that she is who she says she is.  Her very lovely blog, Amused Muse, can be found here.

My girls send their love, though.

--------------
“Why do creationists have such a hard time with commas?

Linky“. ~ Steve Story, Legend

   
Richardthughes



Posts: 11177
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 29 2006,11:09   

uh-huh.
THEY HAVE BIG PLANS.



(repost)

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
steve_h



Posts: 544
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 29 2006,19:43   

Quote
Um... Steve.  Are you quietly asking if Kristine is one of my sockpuppets?

That's too funny, and you're paranoid.  My two girls don't post here, although they're big fans.
Well someones's sock puppet.  She talks about sex and orgasms a lot which could be Kristine's "Korporal Kate", and she apparently has "designs" on Dembski which could be an attempt to entrap an ID big wig.  There was a certain amount of publishing-in-a-minor-journal so that I could claim credit for the exposé  if I somehow turned out to be right - or just let it go unnoticed if not - on my part. I didn't really think I was right about that, but nonetheless slightly worried about the possibility of complaints about cover blowing etc.

  
Lou FCD



Posts: 5452
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 29 2006,20:14   

Well, you got me thinking, so I did some digging and googling, and if Kristine is not who she says she is, she's done a #### of a lot bigger and more convincing job than I EVER did with Janie.  She's got several blogs, her own top level domain name, shows up pretty solidly in several community activity type sites around her home town, etc. and each one links to another piece of her online persona, and eventually you wind up at Amused Muse....

She's also a regular commenter at PZ's place, and has been for quite a while (like over a year).

I'm willing to bet the farm that Ms. Kristine is exactly who she says she is.

All her pertinent information can be found if you look for it, rather easily enough.  I hesitate to collect it all here in one place for privacy reasons, and out of respect for someone who has come to be a good friend of the girls.

Just so y'know.

--------------
“Why do creationists have such a hard time with commas?

Linky“. ~ Steve Story, Legend

   
skeptic



Posts: 1163
Joined: May 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 29 2006,20:18   

Sounds like a perfectly orchestrated cover to me, maybe she's KGB.  If so look out for the polonium!

  
Lou FCD



Posts: 5452
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 29 2006,20:33   

Oh, and PZ's met her in the flesh.

That pretty well settles that.

--------------
“Why do creationists have such a hard time with commas?

Linky“. ~ Steve Story, Legend

   
Kristine



Posts: 3061
Joined: Sep. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 29 2006,23:45   

Quote
Are you quietly asking if Kristine is one of my sockpuppets?


WHAT?!

I go to class (College of St. Catherine, Intro to Library Science, 701) and my existence is questioned? No way. I introduced everyone in class to Ms. Dewey tonight! (I'm their weird techno geek girl.)

I appeared in this film

And this one. (It's pronounced Butte, not butt, BTW. Someone actually called it butt.)

August Berkshire of MN Atheists has seen me, too.

I used to write book reviews.

And Rev. Barking Nonsequitor has met me! Ask him! I'm supposed to sing in his upcoming skit.

####, dudes! Are you kidding? Want me to come over there and friggin' dance for you? (Oh, yeah--that's what you probably wanted me to say. Okay, I'm naive. A certain lurker is probably laughing his ass off right now too. Well, if he's good he'll get a belly gram too, someday. If he wants one. I'll never make Playboy!;)

And I don't talk about orgasms that much! I'm a doer.

And I think Dembski's a cutie-pie. But I already live with a cutie-pie. Are you a cutie-pie, Steve_h? What do you look like? Are you real? Hey! I demand proof! :p

--------------
Which came first: the shimmy, or the hip?

AtBC Poet Laureate

"I happen to think that this prerequisite criterion of empirical evidence is itself not empirical." - Clive

"Damn you. This means a trip to the library. Again." -- fnxtr

  
Kristine



Posts: 3061
Joined: Sep. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 30 2006,00:34   

Quote
an attempt to entrap an ID big wig


And that's a laugh, BTW. Dembski is married and from what I've heard of Mrs. Cutie-Pie, the minute she steps into a room that I'm in no one is going to look at me anymore. I haven't seen her, but Wes says she's pretty.

Always a milkshake, never a martini, story of my life. :D

But I bet Rev. Dr. Lenny Frank believes I'm real. Don't you, Rev. Dr.? And Lou, of course.

--------------
Which came first: the shimmy, or the hip?

AtBC Poet Laureate

"I happen to think that this prerequisite criterion of empirical evidence is itself not empirical." - Clive

"Damn you. This means a trip to the library. Again." -- fnxtr

  
skeptic



Posts: 1163
Joined: May 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 30 2006,07:56   

me thnks she doth protest too much  :D

  
Kristine



Posts: 3061
Joined: Sep. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 30 2006,09:24   

Quote
me thnks she doth protest too much


Okay, fine. Thus sarcasm doth make sock puppets of us all.

Hello, everybody! I'm really WAD. Now you know. Boy, I sure pulled the wool over your eyes. :p

But WAD is the sock-puppet of...Corporal Kate! Figure that out.

It's sock-puppets all the way down. We were discussing (in another thread) the nesting hierarchy, weren't we?  :)

--------------
Which came first: the shimmy, or the hip?

AtBC Poet Laureate

"I happen to think that this prerequisite criterion of empirical evidence is itself not empirical." - Clive

"Damn you. This means a trip to the library. Again." -- fnxtr

  
Lou FCD



Posts: 5452
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 30 2006,09:31   

Kristine, don't let Skeptic bother you.  He's proven himself to be an idiot on several other threads.

Your "Sockpuppets All The Way Down" hypothesis certainly deserves consideration, though.  Write a grant proposal.

:)

--------------
“Why do creationists have such a hard time with commas?

Linky“. ~ Steve Story, Legend

   
Chris Hyland



Posts: 705
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 30 2006,09:34   

Quote
I introduced everyone in class to Ms. Dewey tonight! (I'm their weird techno geek girl.)
I saw that, finally the internet is living up to the expectations i got from watching science fiction films starring Arnie in the early ninties.

  
Lou FCD



Posts: 5452
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 30 2006,09:44   

Ask Ms. Dewey about herself, it's rather funny.

(Ok, you know I HAD to ask...)

Ask her to remove her clothes...

I'm pissing myself laughing.

--------------
“Why do creationists have such a hard time with commas?

Linky“. ~ Steve Story, Legend

   
Lou FCD



Posts: 5452
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 30 2006,09:51   

HAH!  I just asked her what she knew about "intelligent design", to which she replied

"You seem downright flummoxed".  Too funny.

Then I asked about the missionary position...

"I tried that with three friends once.... Let's just say my memoirs will fetch a million..."


She's more fun than a barrel of Intelligently Designed monkeys.

--------------
“Why do creationists have such a hard time with commas?

Linky“. ~ Steve Story, Legend

   
Lou FCD



Posts: 5452
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 30 2006,10:00   

OK, just one more.

I asked, "What is the orbital distance of Saturn?"

Ms. Dewey replied, "In business, my philosophy is simple - Leave a little something on the table.  Of course, if he's cute enough, I'm the little something."

I'm not sure what that has to do with Saturn, but it was funny.

:D

--------------
“Why do creationists have such a hard time with commas?

Linky“. ~ Steve Story, Legend

   
Kristine



Posts: 3061
Joined: Sep. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 30 2006,10:04   

Ms. Dewey caused a laughing-jag in class, but everyone (except for one guy) pronounced her "annoying." Said guy said: "Some of us like to be ordered around by hot babes with batons." There's always one.

Ms. Dewey is my sock puppet from now on.

Quote
don't let Skeptic bother you.


Oh, I'm not upset, I like a good scrap, and I enjoy bad literary allusions to boot.

Quote
Write a grant proposal.


I need help! My running total is three testable hypotheses (glob. org. day, "athelicious" pork, and sock gods).

--------------
Which came first: the shimmy, or the hip?

AtBC Poet Laureate

"I happen to think that this prerequisite criterion of empirical evidence is itself not empirical." - Clive

"Damn you. This means a trip to the library. Again." -- fnxtr

  
Arden Chatfield



Posts: 6657
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 30 2006,10:21   

Quote (Kristine @ Nov. 30 2006,09:24)
Quote
me thnks she doth protest too much


Okay, fine. Thus sarcasm doth make sock puppets of us all.

Brilliant. Post of the week for that line alone.

"I'm Kristine, and so's my wife!"

--------------
"Rich is just mad because he thought all titties had fur on them until last week when a shorn transvestite ruined his childhood dreams by jumping out of a spider man cake and man boobing him in the face lips." - Erasmus

  
Kristine



Posts: 3061
Joined: Sep. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 30 2006,11:20   

Quote
"I'm Kristine, and so's my wife!"


Throw quantum physic to the dogs, I'll none of it.

I'm Spartacus!

Lou, did you see what your Ms. Dewey said about me?

--------------
Which came first: the shimmy, or the hip?

AtBC Poet Laureate

"I happen to think that this prerequisite criterion of empirical evidence is itself not empirical." - Clive

"Damn you. This means a trip to the library. Again." -- fnxtr

  
Lou FCD



Posts: 5452
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 30 2006,11:31   

Quote (Kristine @ Nov. 30 2006,11:20)
Lou, did you see what your Ms. Dewey said about me?

Oh, you should have heard what she said when I asked her where she was coded...

"I think somebody needs to get a hobby.  Like... something interesting..."

and when I asked again...

"Ladies and gentlemen, in this corner weighing 157 pounds, the world's loneliest man!"

and again...

"Ones and zeros, ones and zeros... All the useless coding, underwear on your head, and you still couldn't create the woman of your dreams.  Poor you."


I like her.

--------------
“Why do creationists have such a hard time with commas?

Linky“. ~ Steve Story, Legend

   
Kristine



Posts: 3061
Joined: Sep. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 30 2006,11:37   

Oh, Ms. Dewey! Keep your paws off my honey-bunny!

--------------
Which came first: the shimmy, or the hip?

AtBC Poet Laureate

"I happen to think that this prerequisite criterion of empirical evidence is itself not empirical." - Clive

"Damn you. This means a trip to the library. Again." -- fnxtr

  
Lou FCD



Posts: 5452
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 30 2006,11:44   

I have to go now.  I just made a rather graphic offer to Ms. Dewey, to which she replied,

"Hey.  If you can get inside your computer, you can do whatever you want to me."

See ya'.

--------------
“Why do creationists have such a hard time with commas?

Linky“. ~ Steve Story, Legend

   
Kristine



Posts: 3061
Joined: Sep. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 30 2006,12:01   

Quote
I'm not sure what that has to do with Saturn, but it was funny.


That could be a reference to Sun Ra.

:O  Now she's sharpening a big ole knife. "Let's get down to business." She doesn't like me, Lou, and I don't like her!

--------------
Which came first: the shimmy, or the hip?

AtBC Poet Laureate

"I happen to think that this prerequisite criterion of empirical evidence is itself not empirical." - Clive

"Damn you. This means a trip to the library. Again." -- fnxtr

  
steve_h



Posts: 544
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 30 2006,15:29   

Quote (Lou FCD @ Nov. 30 2006,03:33)
Oh, and PZ's met her in the flesh.

That pretty well settles that.

I guess it does. Sorry, Lou and Kristine.

  
Lou FCD



Posts: 5452
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 30 2006,16:10   

No apology necessary to me, steve.  I suppose I've gotten everyone jumping at shadows, so it's really my fault.

If anyone owes an apology here, it's me, and I humbly offer it.

Kristine, I'll speak to Ms. Dewey and see if I can sort out the problem.  Perhaps if you offered to teach her to belly dance, the two of you could bond.

--------------
“Why do creationists have such a hard time with commas?

Linky“. ~ Steve Story, Legend

   
Kristine



Posts: 3061
Joined: Sep. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 30 2006,16:21   

Quote
I guess it does. Sorry, Lou and Kristine.


*Haploid naked dance*

But how come people don’t believe me until they check my boyfriend’s blog or PZ’s?

HUH? Shouldn’t evidence be gender-neutral?
 ;)

--------------
Which came first: the shimmy, or the hip?

AtBC Poet Laureate

"I happen to think that this prerequisite criterion of empirical evidence is itself not empirical." - Clive

"Damn you. This means a trip to the library. Again." -- fnxtr

  
Lou FCD



Posts: 5452
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 30 2006,16:25   

Maybe you're just too good to be true?

--------------
“Why do creationists have such a hard time with commas?

Linky“. ~ Steve Story, Legend

   
Kristine



Posts: 3061
Joined: Sep. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 30 2006,16:44   

Quote
Maybe you're just too good to be true?


Oooooh, smooth talk!

Anyway, no apologies needed—though of course, if you want to grovel, Amused Muse is accomodating. *Wiggles fingers to indicate “more compliments”* Assume the position.

But I must leave you gents for a while…my take-home final, my final paper, and my presentation are all due this Saturday…gotta work. And thank you for the link to the article on Wells, whoever that was, and whatever thread that was (augh, mindfart). I’m referencing the article in my paper.

Ta ta! :D

--------------
Which came first: the shimmy, or the hip?

AtBC Poet Laureate

"I happen to think that this prerequisite criterion of empirical evidence is itself not empirical." - Clive

"Damn you. This means a trip to the library. Again." -- fnxtr

  
"Rev Dr" Lenny Flank



Posts: 2560
Joined: Feb. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 30 2006,18:12   

Quote (Kristine @ Nov. 30 2006,00:34)
But I bet Rev. Dr. Lenny Frank believes I'm real. Don't you, Rev. Dr.?

I can't say, since *I* am not real.

:)

--------------
Editor, Red and Black Publishers
www.RedandBlackPublishers.com

  
k.e



Posts: 1948
Joined: Mar. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 02 2006,22:49   

I gave Ms Dewey 'Ted Haggart' and she pulled out  'The Kama Sutra' opened a page and then turned the book upside down, downside up, twisted her head etc.

.....too funny

--------------
The conservative has but little to fear from the man whose reason is the servant of his passions, but let him beware of him in whom reason has become the greatest and most terrible of the passions.These are the wreckers of outworn empires and civilisations, doubters, disintegrators, deicides.Haldane

   
  45 replies since Nov. 06 2006,15:06 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (2) < [1] 2 >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]