Joined: Jan. 2006
|Quote (Mr_Christopher @ June 21 2006,12:49)|
|Quote (GCT @ June 21 2006,12:35)|
|He'll probably just complain now that your tone is derogatory or something.|
No doubt. †It's astonishing though that none of these cry babies has ever asked Dembski or Behe to show them a paper(s) that they submitted to a science journal that was rejected.
Not one of these peer review whiners has ever asked to read a paper that was rejected. †Not one of these persecuted fools has ever asked Dembski or Behe for testable scientific evidence that supports IDC.
During the Kitzmiller trial there was all this discussion about all the IDC related lab work and testing going on by all these biologists all over the place. †Have any of the IDiots noticed not a peep has come from a single scientist supporting IDC since Kitzmiller?
And although the persecuted cry babies go on and on about this peer review conspiracy there is nothing stopping Dembski or Behe from publishing their rejected scientific works on their own blog. Nothing except they have never written any evidence based papers on ID, they have never submitted any papers supporting IDC to a legitimate science journal, nor have they ever conducted any ID related experiements. †Big surprise!
Ooo! Ooo! I know the answer!!
"ID is not a mechanistic theory, and itís not IDís task to match your pathetic level of detail in telling mechanistic stories."
Dembski is as good as his word. †
"Rich is just mad because he thought all titties had fur on them until last week when a shorn transvestite ruined his childhood dreams by jumping out of a spider man cake and man boobing him in the face lips." - Erasmus