RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

    
  Topic: Faux D*mnski posts, Unleash your inner tard.< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
Richardthughes



Posts: 10756
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: July 05 2006,18:13   

I just got this email from a friend:

Quote

Evilutionists eat babies and are responsible for  North Korea being doody-heads.


He is a well respected biologist / polytard who’s written tons of papers and stuff but who wants to remain anonymous so the Darwinian thought police don’t torture his grandma.

--WmAD.

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
deadman_932



Posts: 3094
Joined: May 2006

(Permalink) Posted: July 05 2006,19:40   

I'd like to take this opportunity to retract my statements about Kevin Padian being a Ku Klux Klan member that  eats asian babies. I was misled by my informant who didn't actually see Kevin eating a Korean baby, but a plump Hoagie instead. Nevertheless, I am firmly convinced that Padian might eat a baby sometime in the future.-- WmAD

--------------
AtBC Award for Thoroughness in the Face of Creationism

  
GCT



Posts: 1001
Joined: Aug. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: July 06 2006,07:20   

I've just learned that the ACLU did meet with the Dover plaintiffs before the trial.  I'll bet that they were making secret plans to fleece the Dover schools system out of millions of dollars through jury nullification. - DaveTard

  
stevestory



Posts: 10127
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: July 06 2006,08:01   

Bill, after receiving several emails, I'm correcting your post a little. -dt

Quote
I'd like to take this opportunity to retract my statements about Kevin Padian being a Ku Klux Klan member that  eats asian babies. I was misled by a rumored informant who didn't actually see Kevin eating a Korean baby, but a plump Hoagie instead. Nevertheless, I am firmly convinced that Padian might eat a baby sometime in the future.-- WmAD

   
Faid



Posts: 1143
Joined: Mar. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: July 06 2006,16:20   

In spite of evilutionist lies, here's some indisputable evidence that our ideas are gaining ground everywhere:

http://www.designmuseum.org/

http://www.wpdfd.com/

http://www.designaddict.com/

http://www.oswd.org/

http://www.designiskinky.net/index_main.html

And that's just the first page of the results my searchbot came up with.

--------------
A look into DAVE HAWKINS' sense of honesty:

"The truth is that ALL mutations REDUCE information"

"...mutations can add information to a genome.  And remember, I have never said that this is not possible."

  
Richardthughes



Posts: 10756
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: July 18 2006,05:04   

I just got this email from a friend:

Quote
From DaveScot@[Snip]

WHHHHHHHY? WHHHHHHHY? For the love of god, WHYYYYY? Does everything we've had, everything we've been through count for nothing? I've moderated for you these past years - and you treat this place like a hotel - then all of a sudden, ANOTHER WOMAN? I thought we were going to settle down, start something. But no. Well, you've not heard the last of me, oh no..


I think he's Outta here -- WmAD

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
stevestory



Posts: 10127
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: July 18 2006,05:40   

July 18, 2006
Is This an ID Paper?
Quote
The Origin of Species
Introduction
by Charles Darwin

When on board H.M.S. Beagle, as naturalist, I was much struck with certain facts in the distribution of the inhabitants of South America, and in the geological relations of the present to the past inhabitants of that continent. These facts seemed to me to throw some light on the origin of species -- that mystery of mysteries, as it has been called by one of our greatest philosophers. On my return home, it occurred to me, in 1837, that something might perhaps be made out on this question by patiently accumulating and reflecting on all sorts of facts which could possibly have any bearing on it. After five years' work I allowed myself to speculate on the subject, and drew up some short notes; these I enlarged in 1844 into a sketch of the conclusions, which then seemed to me probable: from that period to the present day I have steadily pursued the same object. I hope that I may be excused for entering on these personal details, as I give them to show that I have not been hasty in coming to a decision.
...

Filed under: Intelligent Design — William Dembski @ 8:52 am
Comments (0)

   
GCT



Posts: 1001
Joined: Aug. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: July 25 2006,02:01   

July 25, 2006
More Logical Fallacies

Appeal to fact is a powerful technique if one has an indefensible position. For example, here is a way that one can argue against ID:

Quote
ID is incorrect.
Here are the facts.
Therefore, ID is incorrect.


Around 2003, Shallit and Elsberry put together a paper attempting to refute ID’s claims. They did not succeed in their attempt, but in the process they left behind a legacy in the art of using facts.

Facts should not be used in an argument against ID, because it is a logical fallacy called "appeal to fact" and therefore ID is correct and their arguments are wrong.

Filed under: Intelligent Design - scordova @ 8:00 am

  
Chris Hyland



Posts: 705
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: July 25 2006,11:59   

Quote
In spite of evilutionist lies, here's some indisputable evidence that our ideas are gaining ground everywhere:

Update: University department based on design principles

  
GCT



Posts: 1001
Joined: Aug. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 10 2006,03:27   

After tossing back a few too many last night, I vomited on my floor at home.  The next morning I came out and noticed the most interesting orange color.

It's the gratuitousness of such interesting color in my vomit that leads me to rebel against materialism.


  
stevestory



Posts: 10127
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 10 2006,05:31   

earlier, I made a faux Dembski post where he pretends Origin of Species is an ID paper. Lo and behold:

http://www.uncommondescent.com/index.php/archives/1401

   
Chris Hyland



Posts: 705
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 10 2006,08:30   

But wait - Darwin was an evil atheist who only came up with evolution to destroy God, but in the origin of species Darwin says he believes in a creator, even though he only came up with evolution as part of an atheist conspiracy...

Comment by SomeDeadGuy — August 10, 2006 @ 6:20 pm

  
steve_h



Posts: 533
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 11 2006,15:26   

This just in from a respected colleage:        
Quote
Repent ye sinner lest thee be consigned to the burny burny fires of H*ll. Don't forget, Jesus died for your sins.  Hi Doctor Dembski, remember me? I'm one of the many distinguished scientist who peer-reviewed your book(s) and was subsequently hunted down like a dog by the materialistic forces of oppression, and who doesn't think you look like a OL's girlfriend in your masthead.

Filed  under: Intelligent Design — William Dembski @ 5:126 am Comments (0)

  
Arden Chatfield



Posts: 6657
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 11 2006,17:44   

Quote (steve_h @ Aug. 11 2006,20:26)
This just in from a respected colleage:            
Quote
Repent ye sinner lest thee be consigned to the burny burny fires of H*ll. Don't forget, Jesus died for your sins.  Hi Doctor Dembski, remember me? I'm one of the many distinguished scientist who peer-reviewed your book(s) and was subsequently hunted down like a dog by the materialistic forces of oppression, and who doesn't think you look like a OL's girlfriend in your masthead.

Filed  under: Intelligent Design — William Dembski @ 5:126 am Comments (0)

I can also tell you that the man who sent me this email is in fact a very famous and respected biologist at a major university with degrees and published articles and everything, and yet he has had to keep his anti-evolution views a secret for fear that the atheist Darwinist enforcers at his university will persecute him if his Christian faith becomes known. Sadly, he has pleaded with me not to reveal his identity, so I cannot tell you his name, but he has also assured me that there are thousands of other distinguished biologists just like himself who realize that materialistic evolution cannot be true.

--------------
"Rich is just mad because he thought all titties had fur on them until last week when a shorn transvestite ruined his childhood dreams by jumping out of a spider man cake and man boobing him in the face lips." - Erasmus

  
blipey



Posts: 2061
Joined: June 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 11 2006,17:51   

Quote (GCT @ July 25 2006,07:01)
July 25, 2006
More Logical Fallacies

Appeal to fact is a powerful technique if one has an indefensible position. For example, here is a way that one can argue against ID:

Quote
ID is incorrect.
Here are the facts.
Therefore, ID is incorrect.


Around 2003, Shallit and Elsberry put together a paper attempting to refute ID’s claims. They did not succeed in their attempt, but in the process they left behind a legacy in the art of using facts.

Facts should not be used in an argument against ID, because it is a logical fallacy called "appeal to fact" and therefore ID is correct and their arguments are wrong.

Filed under: Intelligent Design - scordova @ 8:00 am

This should win an award; it is sublime.  May I suggest the "It Smacketh of Truthiness" award?

--------------
But I get the trick question- there isn't any such thing as one molecule of water. -JoeG

And scientists rarely test theories. -Gary Gaulin

   
GCT



Posts: 1001
Joined: Aug. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 14 2006,05:12   

Quote (blipey @ Aug. 11 2006,22:51)
This should win an award; it is sublime.  May I suggest the "It Smacketh of Truthiness" award?

Wow, thanks.  But, I can't take all the credit.  I'd like to thank the tards over at UD for providing me with so much material to work with.  I couldn't have done it without you guys!

  
Lufeld



Posts: 19
Joined: Sep. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 16 2006,01:06   

A few weeks ago I posted a link to a new upcoming ID paper, which managed to break the peer review barrier.
At PT I was accused of not understanding the irony of that paper. Much  to the delight of the gallery that comments there.
But do these people really understand the relevant math ? For those who are not that familiar with modern  physics it should be said that Lie theory is a  part of the math you have to deal with, if you want to understand theoretical physics today. On the other hand ID theorists do understand the math:

An email I received today from a friend:

 
Quote
Dear Bill,

I learned a lot from you and I frankly admit that I think you really deserve
to be called the Isaac Newton of LIE Theory. Thank you so much for
all the insights you gave me.

Famous Professor Tard


I can assure you that he is a well respected mathematician at a major university . But he wants to stay anonymous because of the Darwinian fascists.

Due to their lack of mathematical abilities the ID critics have not yet recognized that LIE Theory is already an essential part (not to say the essential part) of the Theory of IntelLIEgent Design.

Filed under: Intelligent Design — William Dembski @ 00:00 am

  
Richardthughes



Posts: 10756
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 21 2006,11:22   

just got this email from a Security@Google.com

Quote


We've checked into your housetard's claims that Uncommonly Dense has been "cyber-hacked via the interweb's supermation infohighway by Darwnist Evilution zealots, who earn much less than me. I worked for Dell, you know". We find the claim baseless, but highly amusing.

Regards

=== SNIP ===



--WmAD.

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
stevestory



Posts: 10127
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 21 2006,12:03   

LOL

   
Ichthyic



Posts: 3325
Joined: May 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 21 2006,13:33   

housetard?

*snicker*

--------------
"And the sea will grant each man new hope..."

-CC

  
Richardthughes



Posts: 10756
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 04 2006,10:08   

I just got this email from a minion:


 
Quote
To: Grand_wizzard@Uncom[snip]

I pledge allegiance to the secret seal of ID. Your word is law, your law is fact, your facts bring light to the designer's eternal majesty. Your filter is flawless, long may we see CSI.

I will not question, but obey. For as it says is the designers guide:

“Trust in the Lord with all thine heart; and lean not unto thine own understanding." --Proverbs 3:5

"There is a way that seemeth right unto a man, but the end thereof are the ways of death." --Proverbs 16:25

"Casting down imaginations, and every high thing that exalteth itself against the knowledge of God, and bringing into captivity
every thought to the obedience of Christ..." --2 Corinthians 10:5

Humbly yours.

Davescot@[snip]

Ps - I like the idea of pretending to be agnostic. Does that mean atheist?


I welcomed him into the double-secret ID club.  --WMaD.

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
Richardthughes



Posts: 10756
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 03 2006,16:39   

Is this as ID proponent being discriminated against?

http://www.cnn.com/2006....ex.html

WmAD.

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
Kristine



Posts: 3061
Joined: Sep. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 04 2006,05:11   

Are you there, Mr. Dawkins? It's me, Bill.

I know that you personally don't believe in the Father Ship, but I want to thank you for having such wonderful foil for my tin-foil hat, and for your opposition to theism (now, that's the-ism, not theism, the-ism is a new research angle that I am conducting really scientific research about, dealing with the fact that hyphens are strategically placed, such as in phrases like "judeo-christian," in order to link two separate ideas and that therefore, hyphens occur in nature as unexpressed "gaps" between words and suffixes (the and ism) that, when properly filled, demonstrate the existence of an object that is the-ist, that is, though it has a definite article it is not a thing in itself, but awaits the final touches of a Designer, preferably one with a pastry tube) and for intelligent design more generally. In fact, I regularly tell my colleagues that you and your work are one of God's greatest gifts to the intelligent-design movement. So please, keep at it!

WmAD

--------------
Which came first: the shimmy, or the hip?

AtBC Poet Laureate

"I happen to think that this prerequisite criterion of empirical evidence is itself not empirical." - Clive

"Damn you. This means a trip to the library. Again." -- fnxtr

  
Altabin



Posts: 308
Joined: Sep. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 15 2006,17:00   

Quote
I recently crossposted a comment from Panda's Thumb, in which a certain "WillD" said he thought all copies of the Bible should be burned, just as Charles Darwin insisted in the Origin of Species.  Some commenters have expressed some dismay, noting that (1) WillD was an obvious pro-ID troll, (2) his IP address identified him as a faculty member of Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary, and (3) his post, if read slowly, was written in a broad Chicago accent.  That may well be the case, but I do not intend to match this pathetic level of detail.  There is a more interesting question here.  The Panda's Thumb claims to be one of the leading forums for the discussion of evolution.  They also moderate their comments.  What does it say about their vaunted quality control if they let through posts that I could have written? - WmAD


--------------

  
Mr_Christopher



Posts: 1238
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 26 2006,10:53   

Quote (Altabin @ Dec. 15 2006,17:00)
Quote
I recently crossposted a comment from Panda's Thumb, in which a certain "WillD" said he thought all copies of the Bible should be burned, just as Charles Darwin insisted in the Origin of Species.  Some commenters have expressed some dismay, noting that (1) WillD was an obvious pro-ID troll, (2) his IP address identified him as a faculty member of Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary, and (3) his post, if read slowly, was written in a broad Chicago accent.  That may well be the case, but I do not intend to match this pathetic level of detail.  There is a more interesting question here.  The Panda's Thumb claims to be one of the leading forums for the discussion of evolution.  They also moderate their comments.  What does it say about their vaunted quality control if they let through posts that I could have written? - WmAD

Is this true?

--------------
Uncommon Descent is a moral cesspool, a festering intellectual ghetto that intoxicates and degrades its inhabitants - Stephen Matheson

  
Altabin



Posts: 308
Joined: Sep. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 26 2006,11:43   

Quote (Mr_Christopher @ Dec. 26 2006,17:53)
Quote (Altabin @ Dec. 15 2006,17:00)
Quote
I recently crossposted a comment from Panda's Thumb, in which a certain "WillD" said he thought all copies of the Bible should be burned, just as Charles Darwin insisted in the Origin of Species.  Some commenters have expressed some dismay, noting that (1) WillD was an obvious pro-ID troll, (2) his IP address identified him as a faculty member of Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary, and (3) his post, if read slowly, was written in a broad Chicago accent.  That may well be the case, but I do not intend to match this pathetic level of detail.  There is a more interesting question here.  The Panda's Thumb claims to be one of the leading forums for the discussion of evolution.  They also moderate their comments.  What does it say about their vaunted quality control if they let through posts that I could have written? - WmAD

Is this true?

It's a "faux" post - so not true, but with reference to a number of genuine recent Dembski idiocies.

--------------

  
Mr_Christopher



Posts: 1238
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 26 2006,11:46   

Thanks, that was so patently absurd I found it entirely believable :-)

--------------
Uncommon Descent is a moral cesspool, a festering intellectual ghetto that intoxicates and degrades its inhabitants - Stephen Matheson

  
  26 replies since July 05 2006,18:13 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

    


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]