RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

  Topic: Dover at Ten, The Kitzmiller trial's legacy< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
Wesley R. Elsberry

Posts: 4807
Joined: May 2002

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 05 2015,05:29   

This year is the tenth anniversary of the Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District trial. There is a reunion happening this weekend that Diane and I are going to. I've been to reunions up through 2010, and I enjoy them thoroughly.

Because religious antievolution since the Epperson v. Arkansas case has mostly adopted the strategy of deception, I see the time since Dover as confirming that as the approach. After Epperson, the proponents of creationism could have used a strategy of cultural resistance via Sunday school and church. Instead, they seized on phrasing in the Epperson decision's dissenting opinion that of course science of whatever variety could be taught in public school science classrooms, and decided that they would use a subset of the old arguments they used to promote creationism, and claim that those were science. The history of the antievolution movement since then has been a process of iterative cloaking of intent as the courts prove time and again capable of discerning the sham. ('Sham' is the phrasing used in the Edwards v. Aguillard decision in 1987.)

Given that view of history in mind, it is easy to see that the application of the deceptive strategy is still the primary focus of the antievolution movement. The intent is to get as many of the old, shabby, awful arguments from creationism mentioned in public school science classrooms as if they had never been refuted.

Given that our legal system has recourse for teaching sectarian religious doctrines, but not for teaching bad science*, this looks to be a process that will continue. 'Intelligent design' as a commonly accepted, given the benefit of doubt notion is dead, but the arguments that comprised IDC go on under new names, sowing confusion and mistrust of the scientific endeavor.

*There are some provisions for removing incompetent teachers, but applying them is usually difficult and uncertain of achieving good results.

"You can't teach an old dogma new tricks." - Dorothy Parker


Posts: 3654
Joined: Oct. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 05 2015,08:32   

The US is going through an amazingly anti-science period... considering that much of modern science was developed or supported through US research and scientists.

I remember how a Republican judge was able to actually look at the evidence and come to a valid conclusion. It gives me small hope for the rest of our country.

Ignored by those who can't provide evidence for their claims.

  1 replies since Nov. 05 2015,05:29 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]