RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

  Topic: Darwinist Ideologues Are on the Run< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
Jason Spaceman

Posts: 163
Joined: Nov. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 30 2006,00:14   

Found this commentary at Human Events Online.  Grab a barf bag

by Allan H. Ryskind
Posted Jan 30, 2006

The two scariest words in the English language? Intelligent Design! That phrase tends to produce a nasty rash and night sweats among our elitist class.

Should some impressionable teenager ever hear those words from a public school teacher, we are led to believe, that student may embrace a secular heresy: that some intelligent force or energy, maybe even a god, rather than Darwinian blind chance, has been responsible for the gazillions of magnificently designed life forms that populate our privileged planet.

You don’t have to be a liberal to be spooked. Two of our nation’s most illustrious conservative elitists—Charles Krauthammer and George Will—have become terrified by the doubts about Darwinism. Krauthammer’s argument boils down to this: ID is just a “tarted up version of creationism”—and such a “religious” view has no business entering a classroom dealing with a really holy subject such as Darwin. Even if a student is inexorably led by the science to believe that ID is a possibility, according to Krauthammer’s logic, neither the student nor his teacher should be allowed to blurt out something so inappropriate in a biology class.

Missing Truth

Will has nothing but scorn for the lower human life forms who think ID should be mentioned, even if just shyly whispered, in a public school setting. When the Kansas State Board of Education decided to allow—but not require—ID discussions in science classes, Will raged that the board “is controlled by the kind of conservatives who make conservatism repulsive to temperate people.” (Are these the words of a “temperate” man?) Those repugnant conservatives had the audacity to proclaim that evolution is not a fact— “But it is,” Will sniffed.

Really? Well, let’s just see if only dimwitted (and repulsive) conservatives think the case for Darwinian theory is weak. Literally hundreds of geneticists, biologists, paleontologists, chemists, mathematicians and other scientists—whose religious views vary from agnostic to evangelical—say the theory is not a fact. Among them: Lev. V. Beloussov and Vladimir L. Voelkov, two prominent Russian biologists from Moscow State University; Dr. Richard Sternberg, an evolutionary biologist at the Smithsonian Institution; and Dr. David Berlinski, a mathematician with post-doctoral training in molecular biology. (Berlinksi’s scholarly article in the February issue of Commentary will prove an unpleasant read for evolutionists.)

The Discovery Institute recently produced a list of over 400 scientists of varying faith and non-faith—including those from such prestigious institutions as Princeton, MIT and Cornell—who signed onto a statement stressing they were “skeptical of claims for the ability of random mutation and natural selection to account for the complexity of life.”


Posts: 696
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 30 2006,00:39   

Why is that "400 scientists" list always wheeled out as "recently"?  

Anyone know what "Commentary" is for?  IS it a real journal of something?

At this stage I just want to say "Bring it on!  HIt us with your best science!  Come on!"

Jason Spaceman

Posts: 163
Joined: Nov. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 30 2006,01:20   

Quote (guthrie @ Jan. 30 2006,06:39)
Anyone know what "Commentary" is for?  IS it a real journal of something?

I think it is a political opinion magazine, judging from its website.


Posts: 2195
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 30 2006,02:09   

They've been publishing David Berlinski's anti-evolutionary screeds since at least 1996.

And the set of natural numbers is also the set that starts at 0 and goes to the largest number. -- Joe G

Please stop putting words into my mouth that don't belong there and thoughts into my mind that don't belong there. -- KF

Henry J

Posts: 5760
Joined: Mar. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 30 2006,05:30   

Re "The Discovery Institute recently produced a list of over 400 scientists of varying faith and non-faith"

Funny they didn't mention the hundreds of thousands that didn't sign their form letter...


  4 replies since Jan. 30 2006,00:14 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]