sparc

Posts: 2075 Joined: April 2007
|
Caroline Crocker presented "Bunk Detecting Principles to Help the Public Assess ‘Scientific’ Claims” during the ASA annual meeting 2012 (Audio and slides are available here and here). Quote | Principle #1 Check if the author claims that something has been proven or declares something to be a fact. |
Quote | Principle #2 Check if the author makes claims to have accomplished something that is beyond what has actually been done. |
Quote | Principle #3 Check if what is said is scientifically accurate. |
Quote | Principle #4 Beware of grandiose claims.
|
Quote | Principle #5 Check if the claims can be tested scientifically, that is, can they be measured. |
Quote | Principle #6 Be careful when an author makes too much of the scientific qualifications of those involved or disparages those who do not agree his/her views. |
Quote | Principle #7 Check that the "satisfied customers," "experts," study participants, and promoters of the idea or product exist and do not stand to gain from their testimony or participation. |
Quote | Principle #8 Finally, be skeptical. Do not be quick to believe people, especially when it involves your health, faith and/or money!
|
I guess she never tried to assess ID-creationism this way.
(Edited to close brackets)
Edited by sparc on Jan. 21 2013,00:03
-------------- "[...] the type of information we find in living systems is beyond the creative means of purely material processes [...] Who or what is such an ultimate source of information? [...] from a theistic perspective, such an information source would presumably have to be God."
- William Dembski -
|