Joined: Dec. 2006
|Quote (oldmanintheskydidntdoit @ Sep. 18 2007,11:21)|
|I have a very simple challenge to creationists. |
I challenge evolutionists to show me ONE god ever documented in the history of science that has created a new, beneficial, selectable morphological addition to an existing body part. . . . (a god that alters physical, outward appearance in a beneficial way. ) For example, the eye was said to have evolved by way of numerous gods, each god adding on to what previous gods (plus selection) had added before.
Please keep in mind that there are gods that duplicate existing structures, gods that reduce existing structures, gods that deform organisms, and gods that cause disease and death. . . . Unfortunately for Creationists, however, gods can add nothing beneficial to the observable phenotype, which is the cornerstone of “goddidit”.
This is my claim. . this is my challenge. . . and this challenge has not yet been answered by anyone.
Knowing this, it is my opinion that the theory “goddidit” is little more than a wacky metaphysical belief, much like astrology or palm reading.
The floor is open!
If Slimey Sal wasn't 100% right now trying to get some more book-learnn' crammed into him ( OUCH!), he would like soooo be all over your astrology challenge! It's a Young Cosmos you know!
And if only Dr. Dr. Dembski could find his pants after ERV pantsed him last night, he would easily show you the Nixplanatory Filter where is says that ID predicted palm-reading would give you all the answers you ever need.
And if DaveScot wasn't using his palm for other things right now, he'd show you how they do it in the Marines.
Come on Tough Guy, do the little dance of ID impotence you do so well. - Louis to Joe G 2/10
Gullibility is not a virtue - Quidam on Dembski's belief in the Bible Code Faith Healers & ID 7/08
UD is an Unnatural Douchemagnet. - richardthughes 7/11