RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

    
  Topic: Blipey's Transgressions, A depository for Ftk evidence< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
blipey



Posts: 2061
Joined: June 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 06 2008,17:19   

To the moderators:

I'm fully expecting this thread to be killed for two reasons:

1.  Ftk has a poor relationship with evidence and therefor starvation will occur.

2.  The Unreasonable Kansans thread is a perfectly good spot for her to cross-post anything she'd like people to see (which I find amusing, since her complaint is that she doesn't want people to see it).

Still, I thought creation of this thread would be a good-faith offering to Ftk.  If it goes well for her, I may be drummed off of all reasonable websites and forums on the interwebs and look like a raving lunatic.  Or, equally good, she may be exposed as the fraud she is and IDC, by association, takes a (very) small hit as well.

So, have at it, Ftk.

Let's see how evil that *BIPLEY  :p  is.








*merely a low blow into oldman's more private areas.

--------------
But I get the trick question- there isn't any such thing as one molecule of water. -JoeG

And scientists rarely test theories. -Gary Gaulin

   
oldmanintheskydidntdoit



Posts: 4999
Joined: July 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 06 2008,17:22   


  
Louis



Posts: 6436
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 06 2008,17:24   

I for one am looking forward to the veritable torrent of information that will undoubtedly be forthcoming.*

Louis

*Possibly.

--------------
Bye.

  
Ftk



Posts: 2239
Joined: Mar. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 06 2008,18:03   

Sounds great, blipe.  Just remember this...I no longer care whether you are on topic, off topic or posting crap. The point is that I want you to *stop* posting altogether.  I *refuse* to let any more of your posts go through.  Period.  Your threats were the *last* straw.  This crap has gone on too long.  

Granted, since you're being monitored here, you'll try to stay on topic though I believe you may still find it hard to post in line with my moderation policy.  Irregardless, I'm only placing your comments here to show what an ass you are for posting constantly at my blog when you've been asked to stay off of it.

REPEAT:  None of your comments will be going through to my blog ever again.  Got that?  So, you can either stop commenting, or I'll just keep harping at you to stop your freaky obsession with me.  If that doesn't work, I'll have to look into another form of allowing comments through.  It's unfortunate that one obsessed clown can fuck things up so badly.

--------------
"Evolution is a creationism and just as illogical [as] the other pantheistic creation myths"  -forastero

  
blipey



Posts: 2061
Joined: June 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 06 2008,18:27   

Ftk,

In all seriousness, do you actually read any of the comments here except your own?

My contention was that you never care whether or not someone is on topic, only about whether or not that person is on your team (or occasionally whether or not you believe them to be hawt).

So, your claim that "you NO LONGER care" is crap.  You never cared--which has always been the point.

I'll continue to post just as I always have.  If you'd like to join the world of reality, you'd realize that if you run an unmoderated blog, everyone is always being monitored.  So, your claims of violation of your moderation policy remain just where they have always been: unsubstantiated claims.

If you could clear up exactly what your moderation policy is, that might be helpful to the outside world.  Today's posts have summed up my take on your policies.  Would you care to point out where I'm wrong?  Specific examples for illustration always appreciated.

Quote
Irregardless, I'm only placing your comments here to show what an ass you are for posting constantly at my blog when you've been asked to stay off of it.


Great.  Let the fun begin.

--------------
But I get the trick question- there isn't any such thing as one molecule of water. -JoeG

And scientists rarely test theories. -Gary Gaulin

   
khan



Posts: 1525
Joined: May 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 06 2008,18:41   

Quote (Ftk @ Oct. 06 2008,19:03)
Sounds great, blipe.  Just remember this...I no longer care whether you are on topic, off topic or posting crap. The point is that I want you to *stop* posting altogether.  I *refuse* to let any more of your posts go through.  Period.  Your threats were the *last* straw.  This crap has gone on too long.  

Granted, since you're being monitored here, you'll try to stay on topic though I believe you may still find it hard to post in line with my moderation policy.  Irregardless, I'm only placing your comments here to show what an ass you are for posting constantly at my blog when you've been asked to stay off of it.

REPEAT:  None of your comments will be going through to my blog ever again.  Got that?  So, you can either stop commenting, or I'll just keep harping at you to stop your freaky obsession with me.  If that doesn't work, I'll have to look into another form of allowing comments through.  It's unfortunate that one obsessed clown can fuck things up so badly.

Do you mean 'regardless' or 'irrespective'?

--------------
"It's as if all those words, in their hurry to escape from the loony, have fallen over each other, forming scrambled heaps of meaninglessness." -damitall

That's so fucking stupid it merits a wing in the museum of stupid. -midwifetoad

Frequency is just the plural of wavelength...
-JoeG

  
Ftk



Posts: 2239
Joined: Mar. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 06 2008,20:44   

So, let me get this straight blipey....a yes or no to each will suffice....

1.  You plan to keep posting at my blog as long RK is up and running.

2.  You're a rotten little turd who couldn't care less if you've been asked *numerous* times to refrain from your public display of obsession with me.

3.  Even if I post your endless irritating comments here, you will continue posting at my place for all eternity.

Does that about sum it up?

--------------
"Evolution is a creationism and just as illogical [as] the other pantheistic creation myths"  -forastero

  
blipey



Posts: 2061
Joined: June 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 06 2008,21:37   

I'll answer your questions, Ftk.  Just as I answered the last set you asked me.  It seems to me that one of us is afraid of answering questions; I can't remember who.

1.  Yes.

2.  No.  For several reasons that I'll explain if you're interested.

3.  Yes.  I won't even ask you to define "irritating"  :p

--------------
But I get the trick question- there isn't any such thing as one molecule of water. -JoeG

And scientists rarely test theories. -Gary Gaulin

   
blipey



Posts: 2061
Joined: June 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 06 2008,21:44   

Quote
Now, Larry.  While it is demonstrably true that you don't NEED experience, don't you think that it might be nice to have some?


Probably not the 6th comment here.

--------------
But I get the trick question- there isn't any such thing as one molecule of water. -JoeG

And scientists rarely test theories. -Gary Gaulin

   
Ftk



Posts: 2239
Joined: Mar. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 06 2008,22:00   

From the last two posts you addressed toward me, you've added the following digs...

"In case you're having trouble sounding out the two and three syllable words..."

"Did you learn English in school or merely attempt an ESL class?"

This is the kind of stuff that is unacceptable at my blog.  You throw these type of digs in 85% of your posts.  It makes people want to throttle you, and I'm afraid that you're so socially inept that you don't even realize that.  Either that, or you're basically the biggest prick that ever lived.  

That crap is par for the course here, and I've learned to adapt.  I've *devolved* my language so as to fit in here with the peanut gallary slumlords.  It's the only way to hold your own around here.  When in Rome...

But, at my blog it is UNACCEPTABLE.  You will not continuously put me down or mess with my other commenters in that manner.

Since you've proved to the world that you're the all time biggest prick that ever lived, as well as completely and utterly obsessed with me, I'll change to a third party screener, you SOB.  

This thread is unfortunately feeding your obsession, which cannot be good for your mental health issues.

--------------
"Evolution is a creationism and just as illogical [as] the other pantheistic creation myths"  -forastero

  
Jkrebs



Posts: 365
Joined: Sep. 2004

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 06 2008,22:20   

Then why oh why do you keep interacting with him?  If you really want to bring this to an end,

1.  Quit posting here about and with him.

2.  Start throwing out every single one of his posts at your blog.

3.  Don't bother coming back over here to read what he has to say or to to see the posts that you block or delete at your blog.

Take responsibility for your own actions and quit trying to change someone else.

Now I will take my own advice and bow out of this situation.

  
blipey



Posts: 2061
Joined: June 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 06 2008,22:22   

So, this location must be Rome?

I'll post it all just in case you get cold feet:

Quote
   LISTEN UP, PEOPLE. I just got finished deleting over a dozen comments of pure CRAP.

   This bickering at each other will stop NOW. Blipey, I want you gone. Do you understand me? You cause problems, and every post your're on turns to disaster.

   Those of you who are taunting Blipey..COOL IT PLEASE!! He has enough problems as it is. If you egg him on, he'll keep posting FOREVER!

   Blipe wrote:

   If it comes down to it, Reasonable Kansans is going to have the authorities all over it, because you won't muzzle an outright troll. Instead of putting the kibosh down on borderline criminal behavior, you moan over people who post things you don't agree with.

   Get over yourself and clean up your blog.

   Are you freaking kidding me? I'd LOVE to muzzle YOU, but you're such a jerk that you have an undetectible IP address.

   Don't you threaten me with bringing in the "authorities", you jerk.
I've asked you REPEATEDLY TO LEAVE. I don't moan because you disagree with my views. I moan because you're a PAIN IN THE ASS, and you start flame wars continually. I don't have problems with other commenters who disagree with me.

   AND! I have a life, for goodness sakes. I can't come in here and "clean up my blog" every hour of the day. I don't check my comments all the time, and I've been with my family most of the day today. I think they would object to me carrying around my laptop 24/7 so that I can do an hourly blog "clean up" for Blipey. Sheesh!

   Blipe, you're the one that kept after me about moderating comments, and I told you that trolls like youreself were THE REASON WHY I MODERATE COMMENTS. I took off moderation because I didn't want people to have to wait so long to see their comments go through.

   BUT, that will change very soon if you don't get your behind off my blog. I will have to resort to moderating again, and I don't want to do that. I don't have the time for it.

   GO AWAY....PLEASE!
   9:42 PM


Look, this has all the topics of the day in it!

The bold part is where you say I threatened you.  Since you erased my follow-up on the thread, I'll ask again.  Um, where did I threaten you?

Then the italic part shows you doing what you say is unacceptable on your blog.  While all of my comments on the blog are more civil than that...except the ones that were disappeared apparently.

The rest is just you ignoring the real troll on the thread.  You have a real talent for ignoring things with words, truly inspiring.

--------------
But I get the trick question- there isn't any such thing as one molecule of water. -JoeG

And scientists rarely test theories. -Gary Gaulin

   
stevestory



Posts: 10127
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 06 2008,22:23   

Because she's not a real person, behaving normally. She's a character someone's playing, and the behaviors of "Ftk" are simply those which will provoke the most attention.

   
stevestory



Posts: 10127
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 06 2008,22:25   

I don't think anything's going to happen on this thread which wouldn't fit at the preexisting Ftk thread.

   
  13 replies since Oct. 06 2008,17:19 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

    


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]