Joined: Dec. 2005
Only an expectation? With all the experience gained from internet creationism I would have thought you knew the site was nothing but BS even before clicking.
|Quote (Reciprocating Bill @ April 27 2010,15:02)|
|Mike Matthews earned a BA in English and an MEd in English education from Bob Jones University. Mike was the content manager for the Creation Museum and now is the editor-in-chief for Answers magazine.|
I bow to his expertise. But I expected a BS.
|Quote (ppb @ April 27 2010,15:28)|
|Quote (Paul Flocken @ April 27 2010,14:58)|
|I stumbled over this and wondered if it is a new claim or something old.|
|A CREATION MODEL.|
Creation biologists have developed a statistical model to compare the physical traits of various creatures to help determine whether they belonged to the same original “created kind.”
in the second blue highlighted section about half way down the page.
Sounds like Baraminology to me.
I don't think it's particularly new.
I know the overall effort is baraminology. I was curious if the claim to some kind of mathematical rigor was new.
"The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie--deliberate, contrived, and dishonest, but the myth, persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic. Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought."-John F. Kennedy